Abstract
To enhance the relevancy of educational research findings, a research approach known as design research has gained influence. This approach is described as complex, but no satisfying explanation of this complexity has been provided. In this paper we question why design research is complex by nature. Following a longitudinal case conducted by the third author, we argue that design research in educational sciences (EDR) necessitates balancing three different motives and accordingly, three epistemic practices: (1) educational research, (2) educational design, and (3) educational change. An analysis of challenges in the case study shows the difficulty for the EDR researcher to understand and disentangle underlying motives during the research process, but also the difficulty of dealing with different, easily conflicting research positions, resources, quality rules, time frames, audiences, and products. The identification and description of three epistemic practices offers a framework with which difficulties of EDR can be understood and anticipated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akkerman S., Admiraal W., Brekelmans M., Oost H.: Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Qual. Quant. 42, 257–274 (2008)
Almekinders C.J.M., Beukema L., Tromp C.: Research in Action: Theories and Practices for Innovation and Social Change. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen (2009)
Broekkamp B., Van Hout-Wolters B.: The gap between educational research and practice: a literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educ. Res. Eval. 13, 203–220 (2007)
Brown A.: Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J. Learn. Sci. 2, 141–178 (1992)
Cobb P., Confrey J., de Sessa A., Lehrer R., Schauble L.: Design experiments in educational research. Educ. Res. 32, 9–13 (2003)
Cobb P., Zhao Q., Dean Ch.: Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning: a reflection from the field. J. Learn. Sci. 18, 165–199 (2009)
Collins A.: Toward a design science of education. In: Scanlon, E., O’Shea, T. (eds) New Directions in Educational Technology, pp. 15–22. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Collins A., Joseph D., Bielaczyc K.: Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. J. Learn. Sci. 13, 15–42 (2004)
Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S.: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–32. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)
Design-Based Research Collective: Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ. Res. 32, 5–8 (2003)
Engeström Y.: From individual action to collective activity and back: developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In: Luff, P. Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C. (eds) Workplace Studies., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Engeström Y.: Expansive learning at work. Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. J. Educ. Work 14, 133–156 (2001)
Engeström Y.: Putting Vygotsky to work: the change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In: Daniels, H., Cole, M., Wertsch, J.V (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky, pp. 363–382. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Engeström Y., Sannino A.: Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educ. Res. Rev. 5, 1–24 (2010)
Gravemeijer K., van Eerde D.: Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. Elem. Sch. J. 109, 510–524 (2009)
Halloran, J.: The activity space: analyzing intentionality in open cooperative work. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Sussex (2000)
Joseph D.: The practice of design-based research: uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educ. Psychol. 39, 235–242 (2004)
Kezar, A.J.: Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: recent research and conceptualizations. In: Kezar, A.J. (Series ed.) ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, vol. 28(4). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2001)
Kirschner P., Carr C., Van Merriënboer J., Sloep P.: How expert designers design. Perform. Improv. Q. 15(4), 86–104 (2002)
Knorr-Cetina K.D.: The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergammon Press, Oxford (1981)
Knorr-Cetina K.D.: Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Kuhn T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)
Latour B., Woolgar S.: Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publishers, London (1979)
National Research Council: Scientific Research in Education. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2002)
Oost, H.: De kwaliteit van probleemstellingen in dissertaties [The quality of problem statements in dissertations]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands: IVLOS Reeks (1999)
Roth W.M., Lee S.: Science education as/for participation in the community. Sci. Edu. 88, 263–291 (2004)
Roth W.M., Lee Y.L.: “Vygostky’s neglected legacy”: cultural historical activity theory. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 186–232 (2007)
Säljö R.: My brain’s running slow today. The preference for “things ontologies” in research and everyday discourse on human thinking. Stud. Philos. Educ. 21, 389–405 (2002)
Sandoval W.A., Bell P.: Design based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educ. Psychol. 39, 199–201 (2004)
Star S.L.: The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Distrib. Artif. Intell. 2, 37–54 (1989)
Tenkasi R.V., Hay G.W.: Actionable knowledge and scholar-practitioners: a process model of theory-practice linkages. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 17, 177–206 (2004)
van den Vanden Akker J.: Principles and methods of development research. In: Akker, J., Nieveen, N., Branch, R.M., Gustafson, K.L., Plomp, T. (eds) Design Methodology and Developmental Research in Education and Training, pp. 1–14. Kluwer, The Netherlands (1999)
Verschuren P., Hartog R.: Evaluation in design-oriented research. Qual. Quant. 39, 733–762 (2005)
Vygotsky L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)
Vygotsky L.S.: Thought and Language (A. Kozulin, Ed., Trans.). MIT Press, Cambridge (1986) (Original work published 1934)
Wenger E.: Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Learning (1998)
Yamagata-Lynch L.C.: Confronting analytical dilemmas for understanding complex human interactions in design-based research from a cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) framework. J. Learn. Sci. 16, 451–484 (2007)
Zitter, I.: Designing for learning. Studying learning environments in higher professional education from a design perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (2010)
Zitter I., Kinkhorst G., Simons P.R.J., Ten Cate Th.J.: In search of common ground: A task conceptualization to facilitate the design of (e) learning environments with design patterns. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 999–1009 (2009)
Zitter, I., De Bruijn, E., Simons, P. R. J., Ten Cate, Th.J.: The role of professional objects in technology-enhanced learning environments in higher education. Interact. Learn. Environ. (2010). doi:10.1080/10494821003790863
Zitter I., De Bruijn E., Simons P.R.J., Ten Cate Th.J.: Adding a design perspective to study learning environments in higher education: three case studies. High. Educ. 61, 371–386 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akkerman, S.F., Bronkhorst, L.H. & Zitter, I. The complexity of educational design research. Qual Quant 47, 421–439 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9527-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9527-9