Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Erratum to: Philos Stud DOI 10.1007/s11098-013-0226-3
Dear Reader, due to production systems the following changes could not be made to this article:
In the paragraph immediately preceding the case description (ford-iii), the sentence
Here we explicitly state that Smith’s inference is based only on his belief that Jones owns a Ford, and that this logical inference provides Smith’s only justification for believing that someone in his office owns a Ford (to make things fully precise, we also add a time index).
should be replaced with
Here we explicitly state that Smith’s inference is based only on his belief that Jones owns a Ford (plus the justified background belief that Jones is in his office), and that this logical inference provides Smith’s only justification for believing that someone in his office owns a Ford (to make things fully precise, we also add a time index).Footnote 1
And within the case description (ford-iii), the sentence
From this belief alone, Smith logically infers, at time t, to the justified belief that someone in his office owns a Ford, which provides his only justification for that belief at t.
should be replaced with
From this belief alone (plus the justified background belief that Jones is in his office), Smith logically infers, at time t, to the justified belief that someone in his office owns a Ford, which provides his only justification for that belief at t.Footnote 2
Notes
The added part is highlighted in boldface.
The added part is highlighted in boldface.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0226-3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grundmann, T., Horvath, J. Erratum to: Thought experiments and the problem of deviant realizations. Philos Stud 170, 535–536 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0294-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0294-z