Abstract
This paper offers a new unified theory about the meaning of the imperfective and progressive aspects that builds on earlier of analyses in the literature that treat the imperfective as denoting a universal quantifier (e.g. Bonomi, Linguist Philos, 20(5):469–514, 1997; Cipria and Roberts, Nat Lang Semant 8(4):297–347, 2000). It is shown that the problems associated with such an analysis can be overcome if the domain of the universal quantifier is taken to be a partition of a future extending interval into equimeasured cells. Treating the partition-measure (the length of each partition-cell) as a contextually dependent variable allows for a unified treatment of the habitual and event-in-progress readings of the imperfective. It is argued that the contrast between the imperfective and the progressive has to do with whether the quantifier domain is a regular partition of the reference interval or a superinterval of the reference interval.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abusch D. (1998) Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. In: Rothstein S. (eds) Events and Grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Bach E. (1981) On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. In: Cole P. (eds) Radical Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, pp 63–81
Bennett M., Partee B.H. (1978) Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. Indian University Linguistics Club, Bloomington
Bhatt, R. (1997). Counterfactual morphology in modern Indo-Aryan languages: Semantic and typological issues. Ms., University of Pennsylvania and MIT.
Bohnemeyer J. (2002) The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Lincom Europa, Munich
Boneh N., Doron E. (2009) Modal and temporal aspects of habituality. In: Rappaport-Hovav M., Doron E., Sichel I. (eds) Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure, 1651. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bonomi A. (1995) Aspect and quantification. In: Bertinetto P., Bianchi V., Higginbotham J., Squartini M. (eds) Temporal reference, aspect and actionality Vol. 1. Turin, Rosenberg & Sellier, pp 93–110
Bonomi A. (1997) Aspect, quantification and when-clauses in Italian. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(5): 469–514
Carlson G.N. (1982) Generic terms and generic sentences. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11(2): 145–181
Carlson G. (1989) On the semantic composition of English generic sentences. In: Partee B., Chierchia G., Turner R. (eds) Properties, types and meaning Vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 167–192
Carlson G.N. (1999) Evaluating Generics. Illinois Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(1): 1–11
Carlson, G.N., Pelletier, F.J. (eds) (1995) The generic Book. The University of Chicago press, Chicago
Cipria A., Roberts C. (2000) Spanish Imperfecto and Pretérito: Truth conditions and aktionsart effects in a situation semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8(4): 297–347
Cohen A. (1999) Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(3): 221–253
Comrie B. (1976) Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Condoravdi C. (2002) Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In: Beaver D.I., Martínez L.D.C., Clark B.Z., Kaufmann S. (eds) The construction of meaning. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 59–88
Condoravdi, C., & Deo, A. (2008). Aspect Shifts in Indo-Aryan. In Proceedings of International Congress of Linguists (CIL 18), Seoul.
Dahl Ö. (1975) On generics. In: Keenan E. (eds) Formal Semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 99–111
Dahl Ö. (1985) Tense and aspect systems. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Dahl Ö. (1995) The marking of the episodic/generic distinction in tense-aspect systems. In: Carlson G., Pelletier F.J. (eds) The generic book. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 412–425
De Swart, H. (1991). Adverbs of quantification: A generalized quantifer approach. Ph.D. thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Gröningen.
De Swart H. (1998) Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 347–385
Declerck R. (1991) The origins of genericity. Linguistics 29(1): 79–102
Deo, A. (2006). Tense and aspect in Indo-Aryan Languages: Variation and diachrony. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
Dowty D. (1977) Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 45–77
Dowty D. (1979) Word meaning and Montague grammar. Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Eckardt R. (1999) Normal objects, normal worlds and the meaning of generic sentences. Journal of Semantics 16(3): 237–278
Farkas D., Sugioka Y. (1983) Restrictive if/when clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 6(2): 225–258
Ferreira, M. (2005). Event quantification and plurality. Ph.D.thesis, MIT.
Filip, H., & Carlson, G. (1997). Sui generis genericity. In Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium (Vol. 4), Philadelphia.
Goldsmith J., Woisetschleger E. (1982) The logic of the English Progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1): 79–89
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Heyer G. (1990) Semantics and knowledge representation in the analysis of generic descriptions. Journal of Semantics 7(1): 93–110
Iatridou S. (2000) The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2): 231–270
Ippolito M. (2004) Imperfect modality. In: Guéron J., Lecarme J. (eds) The syntax of time. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 359–387
Kiparsky P. (2005) The Vedic injunctive: Historical and synchronic implications. In: Singh R. (eds) The yearbook of south Asian languages and linguistics. de Gruyter, Berlin
Klein W. (1994) Time in language. Routledge, London
Koontz-Garboden A. (2004) Language contact and Spanish aspectual expression: A formal analysis. Lingua 114: 1291–1330
Krifka M., Pelletier F.J., Carlson G., ter Meulen A., Chierchia G., Link G. (1995) Genericity: An introduction. In: Carilson G.N., Pelletier F.J. (eds) The generic book. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–124
Landman F. (1992) The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 1–32
Lawler, J. M. (1973). Studies in English generics. Ph.D.thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Lenci A., Bertinetto P.M. (2000) Aspect, adverbs, and events: Habituality vs. perfectivity. In: Higginbotham J., Pianesi F., Varzi A. (eds) Speaking of events. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Menendez-Benito P. (2002) Aspect and adverbial quantification in Spanish. In: Hirotani M. (eds) NELS proceedings Vol. 32. GLSA, Amherst, MA, pp 365–382
Portner P. (1998) The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74: 760–787
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rooth M. (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 75–116
Ryding K.C. (2005) A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sag I. (1973) On the state of progress on progressives and statives. In: Bailey C.J.N., Shuy R. (eds) New ways of analyzing variation in English. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 83–95
Smith C. (1991) The parameter of aspect. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Thomason R.H. (1970) Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps. Theoria 36(3): 264–281
Thomason R.H. (1984) Combinations of tense and modality. Handbook of Philosophical Logic 2: 135–165
Tröbs H. (2004) Progressive and habitual aspects in Central Mande. Lingua 114: 125–163
Vlach F. (1981) The Semantics of the Progressive. Syntax and Semantics 14: 271–292
von Fintel K. (1995) A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In: Partee B., Kamp H. (eds) Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning, Proceedings of the workshops in Prague and Bad Teinach (Vol. 1, pp. 153–93). University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deo, A. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: partitions as quantificational domains. Linguist and Philos 32, 475–521 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9068-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9068-z