Abstract
Context
In line with inter- and transdisciplinary approaches promoted in Sustainability Science, Participatory Landscape Sustainability Assessments (PLSA) are developing at a rapid pace. PLSA approaches share with other assessments the aim of standardizing observations, while sharing with participatory processes place-based and context-specific viewpoints from diverse stakeholders.
Objective
This literature review presents different PLSA approaches identified in studies, and argues that the lack of a coherent framework and poor substantive theorization can limit the development of PLSA research.
Methods
The study involved a systematic literature review on a corpus of 425 publications, combining bibliographic mapping on the full corpus and a content analysis of a sub-corpus of 138 full texts.
Results
The review of the literature showed that (i) PLSA studies lie at the intersection of ecology, landscape planning and sociocultural approaches, (ii) PLSA indicators evaluate on average 4.7 categories of sustainability, but most are applied at a local level and provide a snapshot of a situation, (iii) stakeholders tend not to be involved in the choice of indicators (only 28.9% of studies) and even more rarely in assessment design (7.2%). When stakeholders are included, they are usually only asked to populate preidentified indicators (63.9%). (iv) Diverse viewpoints are taken into consideration mainly by using indicators (67.3%) rather than by promoting discussion (39.8%). Three types of PLSA study can be differentiated: the participation-oriented approach, the contributive approach (rooted in positivism) and the collaborative approach (rooted in constructivism).
Conclusion
We advocate that future PLSA studies pay more attention to consistency between their objectives, the methods they employ, and the theoretical grounding they enlist. This might help to avoid confusion about different participatory approaches and to understand their respective contributions to Landscape Sustainability Science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abeywardana N, Schütt B, Wagalawatta T, Bebermeier W (2019) Indigenous agricultural systems in the dry zone of Sri Lanka: management transformation assessment and sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030910
Altaba Tena P, García-Esparza JA (2019) The heritagization of a mediterranean vernacular mountain landscape: concepts. Probl Process Heritage Soc 11(3):189–210
Antrop M (2000) Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agr Ecosyst Environ 77(1–2):17–28
Bachi L, Faria DMCP, Barreiros Horta M, Carvalho-Ribeiro S (2021) Mapping cultural ecosystem services (CESs) and key urban landscape features: a pilot study for land use policy and planning review. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 13(2):420–434
Balfour NJ, Durrant R, Ely A, Sandom CJ (2021) People, nature and large herbivores in a shared landscape: a mixed-method study of the ecological and social outcomes from agriculture and conservation. People Nat 3(2):418–430
Baral N, Heinen JT (2007) Resources use, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park-people relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal. Environ Conserv 34(1):64–72
Barnaud C, van Paassen A (2013) Equity, power games, and legitimacy: dilemmas of participatory natural resource management. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05459-180221
Baumann MD, Zimmerer KS, van Etten J (2020) Participatory seed projects and agroecological landscape knowledge in Central America. Int J Agric Sustain 18(4):300–318
Bayne KM, Höck BK, Spence HR, Crawford KA, Payn TW, Barnard TD (2015) New Zealand school children’s perceptions of local forests and the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators: comparing local and international value systems. NZ J Forest Sci 45(1):1–17
Bélisle AC, Wapachee A, Asselin H (2021) From landscape practices to ecosystem services: landscape valuation in Indigenous contexts. Ecol Econ 179:106858
Blanco J, Ollivier G, Alignier A, Aviron S, Sirami C, Kernéïs É, Durant D, Sabatier R (2022) How ecological research on human-dominated ecosystems incorporates agricultural and forestry practices: a literature analysis. Ambio 51:1143–1157
Boafo YA, Saito O, Takeuchi K (2014) Provisioning ecosystem services in rural savanna landscapes of Northern Ghana: an assessment of supply, utilization, and drivers of change. J Disaster Res 9(4):501–515
Bohnet IC, Roebeling PC, Williams KJ, Holzworth D, van Grieken ME, Pert PL, Kroon FJ, Westcott DA, Brodie J (2011) Landscapes Toolkit: an integrated modelling framework to assist stakeholders in exploring options for sustainable landscape development. Landscape Ecol 26(8):1179–1198
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. and Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Online submission.
Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F, Luederitz C, Lang DJ, Newig J, Reinert F, Abson DJ, von Wehrden H (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15
Bravo-Monroy L (2021) Coffee and potato agroecosystems: social construction of spaces as a concept to analyse nature’s contributions to people. Front Ecol Evol 9:87
Brédif H, Arnould P (2004) Evaluer n’est pas gérer: considérations pour rompre le pouvoir des critères et des indicateurs. Revue Forestière Française 56(5):485–502
Calderon C, Butler A (2019) Politicising the landscape: a theoretical contribution towards the development of participation in landscape planning. Landsc Res 45(2):152–163
Chakraborty A, Joshi PK, Sachdeva K (2018) Capturing forest dependency in the central Himalayan region: variations between Oak (Quercus spp.) and Pine (Pinus spp.) dominated forest landscapes. Ambio 47(4):504–522
Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Ryan ME, Reid RS, Riechers M, Serban A, Bennett NJ, Cvitanovic C, Fernández-Giménez ME, Galvin KA, Goldstein BE, Klenk NL, Tengö M, Brennan R, Cockburn JJ, Hill R, Munera C, Nel JL, Österblom H, Pickering T (2021) Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nat Sustain 4(11):983–996
Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059
Cohen MJ (2017) A systematic review of urban sustainability assessment literature. Sustainability (switzerland) 9(11):2048
Council of Europe. (2000). European Landscape Convention. European Treaty Series No. 176.
Dale VH, Kline KL, Parish ES, Eichler SE (2019) Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 34(6):1199–1218
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373):270–272
Dobbie MF (2013) Public aesthetic preferences to inform sustainable wetland management in Victoria, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 120:178–189
Englund O, Berndes G, Cederberg C (2017) How to analyse ecosystem services in landscapes—a systematic review. Ecol Ind 73:492–504
Fischer, A. (2005). Towards sustainable land use: Public demand for plant diversity in agricultural landscapes of central Germany. In Valuation and Conservation of Biodiversity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Convention on Biological Diversity, 205–220.
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755
Gibbes C, Hopkins AL, Díaz AI, Jimenez-Osornio J (2020) Defining and measuring sustainability: a systematic review of studies in rural Latin America and the Caribbean. Environ Dev Sustain 22(1):447–468
Gullino P, Battisti L, Larcher F (2018) Linking multifunctionality and sustainability for valuing peri-urban farming: a case study in the turin metropolitan area (italy). Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051625
Haddaway NR, Macura B, Whaley P, Pullin AS (2018) ROSES reporting standards for systematic evidence syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environ Evidence. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7
Huang X, Sherk JT (2014) Evaluation and comparison of sustainability performance and visual preference of residential landscape elements. HortTechnology 24(3):318–324
Huang L, Wu J, Yan L (2015) Defining and measuring urban sustainability: a review of indicators. Landscape Ecol 30(7):1175–1193
Husson F, Lê S, Pagès J (2017) Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R, vol 15. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/B21874
Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, Washbourne CL (2016) A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv 22:213–220
Karjala MK, Dewhurst SM (2003) Including aboriginal issues in forest planning: a case study in central interior British Columbia. Can Landsc Urban Plan 64(1–2):1–17
Karner K, Cord AF, Hagemann N, Hernandez-Mora N, Holzkämper A, Jeangros B, Lienhoop N, Nitsch H, Rivas D, Schmid E, Schulp CJE, Strauch M, van der Zanden EH, Volk M, Willaarts B, Zarrineh N, Schönhart M (2019) Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing—insights from five European case studies. J Environ Manage 241:488–500
Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19449–19450
Kivinen S (2015) Many a little makes a mickle: cumulative land cover changes and traditional land use in the Kyrö reindeer herding district, northern Finland. Appl Geogr 63:204–211
König HJ, Podhora A, Zhen L, Helming K, Yan H, Du B, Wübbeke J, Wang C, Klinger J, Chen C, Uthes S (2015) Knowledge brokerage for impact assessment of land use scenarios in inner Mongolia, China: extending and testing the FoPIA approach. Sustainability (switzerland) 7(5):5027–5049
Korpilo S, Jalkanen J, Virtanen T, Lehvävirta S (2018) Where are the hotspots and coldspots of landscape values, visitor use and biodiversity in an urban forest? PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203611
Kühne O (2019) Landscape theories: a brief introduction. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25491-9
Lê S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
Lepart, J. and Marty, P. (2013). Évaluer la durabilité des paysages. In L’évaluation de la durabilité (pp. 113–134). Éditions Quæ.
Liao C, Agrawal A, Clark PE, Levin SA, Rubenstein DI (2020) Landscape sustainability science in the drylands: mobility, rangelands and livelihoods. Landscape Ecol 35(11):2433–2447
Loos J, Benra F, Berbés-Blázquez M, Bremer LL, Chan KM, Egoh B, Winkler KJ (2023) An environmental justice perspective on ecosystem services. Ambio 52(3):477–488
Marques MJ, Schwilch G, Lauterburg N, Crittenden S, Tesfai M, Stolte J, Zdruli P, Zucca C, Petursdottir T, Evelpidou N, Karkani A, AsliYilmazgil Y, Panagopoulos T, Yirdaw E, Kanninen M, Rubio JL, Schmiedel U, Doko A (2016) Multifaceted impacts of sustainable land management in drylands: a review. Sustainability (switzerland) 8(2):177.
Medeiros A, Fernandes C, Gonçalves JF, Farinha-Marques P (2021) Research trends on integrative landscape assessment using indicators—a systematic review. Ecol Indic 129:107815
Metallinou MM (2020) Emergence of and learning processes in a civic group resuming prescribed burning in Norway. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12145668
Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106(1):213–228
Moraine M, Grimaldi J, Murgue C, Duru M, Therond O (2016) Co-design and assessment of cropping systems for developing crop-livestock integration at the territory level. Agric Syst 147:87–97
O’Neill J, Holland A, Light A (2008) Environmental Values. Routledge, England
Oudes D, Stremke S (2020) Climate adaptation, urban regeneration and brownfield reclamation: a literature review on landscape quality in large-scale transformation projects. Landsc Res 45(7):905–919.
Palacios-Agundez I, Onaindia M, Potschin M, Tratalos JA, Madariaga I, Haines-Young R (2015) Relevance for decision making of spatially explicit, participatory scenarios for ecosystem services in an area of a high current demand. Environ Sci Policy 54:199–209.
Pistorius T, Carodenuto S, Wathum G (2017) Implementing forest landscape restoration in Ethiopia. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030061
Pullin AS, Stewart GB (2006) Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 20(6):1647–1656
Puskás N, Abunnasr Y, Naalbandian S (2021) Assessing deeper levels of participation in nature-based solutions in urban landscapes—a literature review of real-world cases. Lands Urban Plan 210:104065
Reed MS, Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ (2006) An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecol Econ 59(4):406–418
Roe M (2013) Landscape and participation. the routledge companion to landscape studies. Routledge, England, pp 335–352
Sapkota LM, Jihadah L, Sato M, Greijmans M, Wiset K, Aektasaeng N, Daisai A, Gritten D (2021) Translating global commitments into action for successful forest landscape restoration: lessons from Ing watershed in northern Thailand. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104063
Sébastien L, Lehtonen M, Bauler T (2017) Introduction. Les indicateurs participatifs tiennent-ils leurs promesses? Participations 2:9–38
Selman P (2008) What do we mean by sustainable landscape? Sustain: Sci Prac Policy 4(2):23–28
Shaaban M, Schwartz C, Macpherson J, Piorr A (2021) A conceptual model framework for mapping, analyzing and managing supply–demand mismatches of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Land 10(2):1–19
Sharma D, Holmes I, Vergara-Asenjo G, Miller WN, Cunampio M, Cunampio RB, Cunampio MB, Potvin C (2016) A comparison of influences on the landscape of two social-ecological systems. Land Use Policy 57:499–513
Sheikhnejad Y, Yigitcanlar T (2020) Scientific landscape of sustainable urban and rural areas research: a systematic scientometric analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041293
Speelman EN, García-Barrios LE, Groot JCJ, Tittonell P (2014) Gaming for smallholder participation in the design of more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Agric Syst 126:62–75
Team, R. C. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2012
Tekken V, Spangenberg JH, Burkhard B, Escalada M, Stoll-Kleemann S, Truong DT, Settele J (2017) “Things are different now”: Farmer perceptions of cultural ecosystem services of traditional rice landscapes in Vietnam and the Philippines. Ecosyst Serv 25:153–166
Terêncio DPS, Varandas SGP, Fonseca AR, Cortes RMV, Fernandes LF, Pacheco FAL, Monteiro SM, Martinho J, Cabral J, Santos J, Cabecinha E (2021) Integrating ecosystem services into sustainable landscape management: a collaborative approach. Sci Total Environ 794:148538
Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24(8):1037–1052
Urquhart J, Acott T (2014) A Sense of place in cultural ecosystem services: the case of cornish fishing communities. Soc Nat Resour 27(1):3–19
van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2058v1
Vaca RA, Rodiles-Hernández R, Ochoa-Gaona S, Taylor-Aquino NE, Obregón-Viloria R, Díaz-García DA, Navarrete-Gutiérrez DA (2019) Evaluating and supporting conservation action in agricultural landscapes of the Usumacinta River Basin. J Environ Manage 230:392–404
Vallés-Planells M, Galiana F, van Eetvelde V (2014) A classification of landscape services to support local landscape planning. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06251-190144
Vallet A, Locatelli B, Levrel H, Dendoncker N, Barnaud C, Conde YQ (2019) Linking equity, power, and stakeholders’ roles in relation to ecosystem services. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10904-240214
Van Bueren EML, Blom EM (1997) Hierarchical framework for the formulation of sustainable forest management standards. Tropenbos Foundation, Wageningen
Vera-Baceta MA, Thelwall M, Kousha K (2019) Web of science and scopus language coverage. Scientometrics 121(3):1803–1813
Vialatte A, Barnaud C, Blanco J, Ouin A, Choisis JP, Andrieu E, Sheeren D, Ladet S, Deconchat M, Clément F, Esquerré D, Sirami C (2019) A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 34(7):1653–1673
Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landsc Ecol 21(1):1–4
Wu J (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc Ecol 28(6):999–1023
Wu J (2021) Landscape sustainability science (II): core questions and key approaches. Landsc Ecol (issue Ii). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01245-3
Wulff Barreiro F, Brito Gonzalez O (2020) The production of intercultural urban landscapes, a multi-scalar approach: the case of Ballarò Palermo. Urban Design Int 25(3):250–265
Yang G, Yu Z, Zhang J, Søderkvist Kristensen L (2021) From preference to landscape sustainability: a bibliometric review of landscape preference research from 1968 to 2019. Ecosyst Health Sustain 7(1):1948355
Zhou BB, Wu J, Anderies JM (2019) Sustainable landscapes and landscape sustainability: A tale of two concepts. In Landscape and Urban Planning 189:274–284
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the « Laboratoire Mixte International » « Vers un observatoire collaboratif des paysages et de leurs durabilités à Madagascar » (LMI Paysages) for its financial and technical support.
Funding
This study was supported by the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: Study conception and design: CM, JB, SMC. Data collection: CM. Analysis and interpretation of results: CM, JB. Draft manuscript preparation: CM. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Moreau, C., Blanco, J., Randriamalala, J. et al. Participatory landscape sustainability assessment: where do we stand? A systematic literature review. Landsc Ecol 38, 1903–1918 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01695-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01695-x