Abstract
The evolution of the classical states, as well as a quantum state under the nonlinear Hamiltonian, detaches the state from the initial state, and the evolved state wanders through various facets in the state space. In the nonlinear Kerr evolution, the number state filtered coherent state (NSFCS) derived from the coherent state (CS) is chosen as an initial state. The departure from coherence is quantified by the Hilbert–Schmidt distance between the CS and the NSFCS in the Kerr medium; it is also calculated between the CS and the photon-added coherent states (PACS) in the Kerr medium. The similarity of states between the initial state and the time-evolved NSFCS is also analyzed through the Hilbert–Schmidt distance. We show the revivals and fractional revivals of the NSFCS, in view of the expectation values of the observables, optical tomogram, and Wigner function. The NSFCS revives at the integral multiples of π. The collapse of the wave packet does not occur at an instant of π/\( \sqrt{2} \) as like the coherent states and photon-added coherent states. These features are revealed in the moments of observables and optical tomogram. Further, the distinct features of the spread of sub-packets are captured by the Wigner function.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. W. Robinett, Phys. Rep., 392, 1 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-8998/2/3/006
A. Miranowicz, R. Tanas, and S. Kielich, Quantum Opt., 2, 253 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-8998/2/3/006
N. Imoto, H. A. Haus, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. A, 32, 2287 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.32.2287
Z. R. Gong, H. Ian, Y.-S. Liu, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 80, 065801 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.065801
A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Rev. Mod. Phys., 93, 025005 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025005
M. Reagor, W. Pfaff, C. Axline, et al., Phys. Rev. B 94, 014506 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.014506
B. Sharmila, K. Saumitran, S. Lakshmibala, and V. Balakrihnan, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 50, 045501 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/aa51a4
I. Yousaf and S. Iqbal, J. Russ. Laser Res., 37, 328 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-016-9579-3
C. Sudheesh, S. Lakshmibala, and V. Balakrishnan, Phys. Lett. A, 329, 14 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.06.085
C. Sudheesh, S. Lakshmibala, and V. Balakrishnan, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 7, S728 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/7/12/040
M. Rohith and C. Sudheesh, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 47, 045504 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/47/4/045504
R. Chakrabarti and V. Yogesh, Physica A, 490, 886 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.015
N. Meher and S. Sivakumar, Quantum Inf. Process., 17, 233 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1995-6
N. Meher and S. Sivakumar, Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 51 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2553-6
J. Merlin, E. Devibala, and A. B. M. Ahmed, Eur. Phys. J. D, 76, 47 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00372-z
G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, Z. Leghtas, et al., Nature, 495, 205 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11902
M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A, 35, 725 (1987); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.725
V. V. Dodonov, O. V. Man’ko, V. I. Man’ko, and A. Wuensche, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 633 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008233385
S. H. Xiang and K. H. Song, Eur. Phys. J. D, 69, 260 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2015-60480-1
M. G. Genoni and M. G. A. Paris, Phys. Rev. A, 82, 052341 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.052341
U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys, 29, 74 (1957); https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.74
K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev., 177, 1882 (1969); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.177.1882
E. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 277 (1963); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277
K. Husimi, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan, 22, 264 (1940); https://doi.org/10.11429/ppmsj1919.22.4_264
E. Wigner, “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,” in: A. S. Wightman (Ed.), The Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1997), Vol. A, p. 4.
E. Wigner, Phys. Rev., 40, 749 (1932); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59033-7_9
A. Ibort, V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, et al., Phys. Scr., 79, 065013 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/79/06/065013
K. Vogel and H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A, 40, 2847 (1989); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.2847
A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Rev. Mod. Phys, 81, 299 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.299
M. R. Bazrafkan and V. I. Man’ko, J. Russ. Laser Res., 24, 80 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022573510147
S. N. Filippov and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Scr., 83, 058101 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/83/05/058101
Y. A. Korennoy and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Rev. A, 83, 053817 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.053817
M. Rohith and C. Sudheesh, Phys. Rev. A, 92, 053828 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053828
R. F. Bishop and A. Vourdas, Phys. Rev. A, 50, 4488 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.4488
C. C. Gerry and P. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press (2004).
M. Stóbinska, G. J. Milburn, and K. Wódkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A, 78, 013810 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.013810
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Merlin, J., Ahmed, A.B.M. Evolution of the Number State Filtered Coherent State in a Kerr Medium. J Russ Laser Res 43, 546–555 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-022-10080-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-022-10080-z