Abstract
The question of whether wh-in situ stays in situ, or undergoes some form of covert wh-movement that parallels overt wh-movement, remains controversial despite decades of research. We present data from Vietnamese which indicate that wh-in situ can be interpreted by either covert movement or unselective binding without movement. Covert movement takes place in matrix questions that lack a question particle, while unselective binding is used when there is a question particle and in embedded questions generally. The Vietnamese data also show that covert movement observes the same constraints—in particular, Subjacency—as overt movement. The correlation between unselective binding and the question particle in matrix questions appears to support recent theoretical views of question particles (e.g., Cheng, 1991), but we argue that this is only apparent. The question particle merely serves a syntactic licensing function, and this function is borne by a question-embedding verb in embedded questions, meaning that it is not inherent to question particles as such. The question particle in Vietnamese actually serves an unrelated semantic function: it indicates realis mood and induces a presupposition. The implication is that question particles are only indirectly related to wh-in situ, if they are related at all.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aoun J., Li Y.H.A. (1993). Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry, 24:199–238
Baker C.L. (1970). Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question Morpheme. Foundations of Language, 6:197–219
Beck, S. (1996). Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics, 4, 1–56.
Bobaljik, J. (1995). Morphosyntax: The verbal inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bruening, B. (2004). There is no relation between Wh-in situ and Wh- indefinites or question particles. Ms University of Delaware.
Cheng, L., & Lai S. (1991). On the typology of Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. R. Anderson, & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Chomsky, N. (1976). Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistics Analysis, 2, 4.
Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh-movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wascow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). New York: Academic Press.
Cole, P., & Hermon, G. (1994). Is there LF movement? Linguistics Inquiry, 2, 239–262.
Cole, P., & Hermon, G. (1998). The typology of Wh-movement: Wh-questions in Malay. Syntax, 1, 221–258.
Comorovski, I. (1996). Interrogative phrases and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Duffield, N. (2004). Aspects of Vietnamese clause structure: Separating tense from assertion. ms., University of Nijmegen/University of Sheffield, accepted for publication in Linguistics (forthcoming).
Groat, E., & O’Neil J. (1996) Spell-Out at the LF interface. In W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thra´isson & C-J. W. Zwart (Eds.), Minimalist ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist Framework. (pp. 113–139). Linguistik Aktuell Amsteldam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hagstrom, P. (1998). Decomposing questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusettts, Amherst.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Milsark, G. L. (1974). Existential sentences in English. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Nishigauchi, T. (1986). Quantification in syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Pesetsky, D. (1987). Wh-in situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E. Reuland, & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 98–129). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, D. (1998). Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis, & D. Pesetsky (Eds.), Is the best good enough?—optimality and competition in syntax (pp. 337–383). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, D. (2000). Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Reinhart, T. (1998). Wh-in situ in the framework of the minimalist program, Natural Language Semantics, 6, 29–56.
Richards N. (2001). Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Tomioka, S. (2004). Pragmatics of LF intervention effects are topic effects. Wh-interrogatives in Japanese and Korean. ms., University of Delaware.
Wanatabe A. (1992). Subjacency and S-structure movement of Wh-in situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1:255–291
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruening, B., Tran, T. Wh-Questions in Vietnamese. J East Asian Linguist 15, 319–341 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-9001-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-9001-1