Abstract
The is article analyses the two main approaches for artists’ selection in the recording industry: the direct model in which large major companies directly choose new artists from the supply market, and the agency model in which small independent labels realise the first choice and, subsequently, large organisations pick their new artists among those pre-selected by independents.
An empirical analysis of chart sales reveals that artists selected through the agency model exhibit a longer presence on the chart due to repeated successes, while they are slower to reach heavy success once they have entered the chart. Conversely, the direct model leads to artists with a faster path to a strong success, but the same artists have a shorter presence on the chart due to the sporadic nature of their success. The profile of artists selected through these two models is also found to be different: big international soloist stars are more frequently selected through the direct model, while national bands are more frequently selected through the agency model.
The insights suggest important implications for management in the cultural industries and especially in the recording industry.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adler, M. (1985) Stardom and talent. American Economic Review, 75, 208–212.
Alexander, P.J. (1997) Product variety and market structure: a new measure and a simple test. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 32(2), 207–214.
Anand, N., & Peterson, R.A. (2000) When market information constitutes fields: sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry. Organization Science, 11, 270–284.
Belinfante, A., & Johnson, L. (1982) Competition, pricing and concentration in the US recording industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, 6(2), 11–24.
Black, M., & Greer, D. (1987) Concentration, and non-price competition in the recording industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 3, 13–37.
Burke, A.E. (1996) The dynamics of product differentiation in the British recording industry. Small Business Economics, 9(6), 463–471.
Burke, A.E. (1997) Small firm start-up by composers in the recording industry. Small Business Economics, 9(6), 463–471.
Burnett, R. ( 1986) The global jukebox, 1986.
Castañer, X., & Campos, L. (2002) The determinants of artistic innovation: bringing in the role of organisation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26, 29–52.
Caves, R. ( 2000) Creative industries: contracts between art and commerce. Harvard University Press.
Chung, K.H., & Cox, R.A.K. (1994) The stochastic model of superstardom: an application of the Yule distribution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(4), 771–775.
Crain, W.M., & Tollison, R.D. (1997) Economics and the architecture of popular music. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90(1), 185–205.
Crain, W.M., & Tollison, R.D. (2002) Consumer choice and the popular music industry: a test of the superstar theory. Empirica, 29(1), 1–9.
Fine, C.H., & Withney, D.E. (1996) Is the make-buy decision process a core competence? MIT Working Paper, Boston MA.
Hamlen, W.A. (1991) Superstardom in popular music: empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4), 729–733.
Heunks, F.J. (1998) Innovation, creativity and success. Small Business Economics, 10, 263–272.
von Hippel, E. (1988) The sources of innovations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Holbrook, M.B., & Schindler R.M. (1989) Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 119–124.
IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industry) ( 2004) The recording industry. World Sales.
Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G.M., & Choi, C.J. (1999) Increasing returns and social contagion in cultural industries. British Journal of Management, 10, s61–s72.
Lacher, K.T., & Mizerski, R. (1994) An exploratory study of the responses and relationships involved in the evaluation of, and in the intention to purchase new rock music. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 366–380.
Lampel, J., Lant, T., & Shamsie J. (2000) Balancing act: learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organization Science, 11, 263–269.
Leadbeater, C. (1999) Living on thin air: the new economy. London, Viking.
Lopes, P. (1992) Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry, 1969 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 57(1), 56–71.
Manuel, P. (1993) Cassette culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.
Mixon, F.G., & Ressler, R.W. (2000) A note on elasticity and price dispersions in the music recording industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 465–470.
Peterson, R.A., & Berger D. (1975) Cycles in symbol production: the case of popular music. American Sociological Review, 40, 158–173.
Rosen, S. (1981) The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 71, 845–858.
Rothenbuhler, E.W., & Dimmick, J.W. (1982) Popular music concentration and diversity in the industry. Journal of Communication, 32, 143–147.
Simmel, G. (1957) Fashion. American Journal of Sociology, 62.
Spinetoli, J.J. ( 1997) Artisti in classifica. Album, Musica & Dischi (In Italian).
Strobl, E.A., & Tucker, C. (2000) The dynamics of chart success in the UK pre-recorded popular music industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, 19, 221–235.
Throsby, D. (1994) The production and the consumption of the arts: a view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1–29.
Wijnberg, N.M. (1995) Selection processes and appropriability in art, science and technology. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24(2), 113–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Jel Codes: L82; O32
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ordanini, A. Selection models in the music industry: How a prior independent experience may affect chart success. J Cult Econ 30, 183–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-006-9013-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-006-9013-8