Abstract
Lengthening the late reproductive phase (LRP) of stem elongation in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.), by changing its photoperiod sensitivity independently of the preceding phases, would improve the yield potential through increasing spike weight and the number of fertile florets at anthesis. This paper presents results of a two-year field experiment designed to determine the impact of Ppd-D1and Ppd-B1on (i) the duration of three pre-anthesis developmental phases, and (ii) spike weight and the number of fertile florets at anthesis under two photoperiods during the LRP (natural and an extension of six hours over that). Near isogenic lines of Mercia and single chromosome recombinant lines of Cappelle Desprez were used. Under natural photoperiod, Ppd-D1hastened time to anthesis ca. 500∘C d in both backgrounds by reducing each of the three pre-anthesis phases. Ppd-B1hastened the time to anthesis under natural photoperiod by 178∘C d, mainly by reducing the early reproductive phase. The response to photoperiod of the LRP under extended daylength depended on the Ppdlocus present: Ppd-D1was insensitive while Ppd-B1and the recessive controls were sensitive. For all lines, photoperiod treatments and years, the number of fertile florets was associated with spike dry weight at anthesis (R 2≅ 80%, p< 0.01) which, in turn, was positively related to the intercepted radiation accumulated during the LRP (R 2 45%, p< 0.05). Changing the duration of the LRP through extended photoperiod or through Ppd-D1produced similar results in both backgrounds and years. Thus, altering the duration of the LRP by manipulating photoperiod sensitivity may be an alternative to changing the fertile floret number in wheat. Nevertheless, as no particular allele was responsible for the photoperiod sensitivity only during the LRP, new alleles should be studied to identify the control of photoperiod sensitivity of individual phases to fine-tune the pre-anthesis wheat development.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abbate, P.E., F.H. Andrade & J.P. Culot, 1995. The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat. J Agric Sci 124: 351–360.
Abbate, P.E., F.H. Andrade, J.P. Culot & P.S. Bindraban, 1997. Grain yield in wheat: Effects of radiation during spike growth period. Field Crops Res 54: 245–257.
Baker, J.T., P.J. Pinter, R.J. Reginato & E.T. Kanemasu, 1986. Effects of temperature on leaf appearance in spring and winter wheat cultivars. Agron J 78: 605–613.
Börner, A., A.J. Worland, J. Plaschke, E. Schumann & C.N. Law, 1993. Pleiotropic effects of genes for reduced height (Rht) and day-length insensitivity (Ppd) on yield and its components for wheat grown in middle Europe. Plant Breeding 111: 204–216.
Brooking, I.R. & E.J.M Kirby, 1981. Interrelationship between stem and ear development in winter wheat: The effects of a Norin 10 dwarfing gene, Gai/Rht2. J Agric Sci 97: 373–381.
Calderini, D.F., M.F. Dreccer & G.A. Slafer, 1995. Genetic improvement in wheat yield and associated traits. A re-examination of previous results and latest trends. Plant Breeding 114: 108–112.
Calderini, D.F., D.J. Miralles & V.O. Sadras, 1996. Appearance and growth of individual leaves as affected by semidwarfism in isogenic lines of wheat. Ann Bot 77: 583–589.
Cao, W. & D.N. Moss, 1991a. Vernalization and phyllochron in winter wheat. Agron J 83: 178–179.
Cao, W. & D.N. Moss, 1991b. Phyllochron change in winter wheat with planting date and environmental changes. Agron J 83: 396–401.
Davidson, J.L., K.R. Christian, D.B. Jones & P.M. Bremner, 1985. Response of wheat to vernalization and photoperiod. Aust J Agric Res 36: 347–359.
Demotes-Mainard, S., M.H. Jeuffroy & S. Robin, 1999. Spike dry matter and nitrogen accumulation before anthesis in wheat as affected by nitrogen fertilizer: Relationship to kernels per spike. Field Crops Res 64: 249–259.
Demotes-Mainard, S. & M.H. Jeuffroy, 2001. Partitioning of dry matter and nitrogen to the spike throughout the spike growth period in wheat crops subjected to nitrogen deficiency. Field Crops Res 70: 153–165.
Demotes- Mainard, S. & M.H. Jeuffroy, 2004. Effects of nitrogen and radiation on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation in the spike of winter wheat. Field Crops Res 87: 221–223.
Fischer, R.A., 1975. Yield potential in a dwarf wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Sci 15: 607–613.
Fischer, R.A., 1984. Wheat. In W.H. Smith & J.J. Banta (Eds). Potential productivity of field crops under different environments, Los Baños, IRRI, pp.: 129–154.
Fischer, R.A., 1985. Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J Agric Sci 100: 447–461.
Fischer, R.A., 1993. Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. II. Physiology of grain and yield response. Field Crops Res 33: 57–80.
Fischer, R.A. & Y.M. Stockman, 1980. Kernel number per spike in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.); responses to pre-anthesis shading. Aust J Plant Physiol 7: 169–180.
Foulkes, M.J., R. Sylvester-Bradley, A.J. Worland & J.W. Snape, 2004. Effects of a photoperiod-response gene Ppd-D1 on yield potential and drought resistance in UK winter wheat. Euphytica 135: 63–73.
Gardner, J.S., W.M. Hess & E.J. Trione, 1985. Development of the young wheat spike: A SEM study of Chinese spring wheat. Am J Bot 72: 548–559.
González, F.G., G.A. Slafer & D.J. Miralles, 2002. Vernalization and photoperiod responses during wheat pre-flowering reproductive phases. Field Crops Res 74: 183–195.
González, F.G., G.A. Slafer & D.J. Miralles, 2003a. Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats. Field Crops Res 81: 17–27.
González, F.G., G.A. Slafer & D.J. Miralles, 2003b. Floret development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat. Field Crops Res 81: 29–38.
Griffiths, F.E.W., R.F Lyndon, & M.D. Bennet, 1985. The effects of vernalization on the growth of the wheat shoot apex. Ann Bot 56: 501–511.
Halloran, G.M. & A.L. Pennell, 1982. Duration and rate of development phases in wheat in two environments. Ann Bot 49: 115–121.
Haun, J.R. 1973. Visual qualification of wheat development. Agron J 65: 116–119.
Hay, R.K.M. & R. Delécolle, 1989. The setting of rates of development of wheat plants at crop emergence: Influence of the environment on rates of leaf appearance. Ann Appl Biol 115: 333–341.
Jamieson, P.D., I.R. Brooking & J.R. Porter, 1995. Prediction of leaf appearance in wheat: A question of temperature. Field Crops Res 41: 35–44.
Kirby, E.J.M., 1988. Analysis of leaf, stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet initiation to anthesis. Field Crops Res 18: 127–140.
Kirby, E.J.M., 1995. Factors affecting rate of leaf emergence in barley and wheat. Crop Sci 35: 11–19.
Law, C.N., 1966. The location of genetic factors controlling a number quantitative characters in wheat. Genetics 56: 445–461.
Law, C.N., 1987. The genetic control of day-length response in wheat. In: J.G. Atherton (ed.), Manipulation of flowering, Proc. 45{th} Nottingham Eater School in Agric. Science, London, Butterworths, pp. 225–240.
Law, C.N. & A.J. Worland, 1997. Genetic analysis of some flowering time and adaptive traits in wheat. New Phytol 137: 19–28.
Law, C.N., J. Stuka & A.J. Worland, 1978. A genetic study of daylength response in wheat. Heredity 41: 185–191.
Miralles, D.J. & G.A. Slafer, 1995. Yield, biomass and yield components in dwarf, semidwarf and tall isogenic lines of spring wheat under recommended and late sowings dates. Plant Breeding 114: 392–396.
Miralles, D.J. & R.A. Richards, 2000. Responses of leaf and tiller emergence and primordium initiation in wheat and barley to interchanged photoperiod. Ann Bot 85: 655–663.
Miralles, D.J, R.A. Richards & G.A. Slafer, 2000. Duration of stem elongation period influences the number of fertile florets in wheat and barley. Aust J Plant Physiol 27: 931–940.
Miralles, D.J., S.D. Katz, A. Colloca & G.A. Slafer, 1998. Floret development in near isogenic lines differing in plant height. Field Crops Res 59: 21–30.
Prystupa, P., R. Savin & G. Slafer, 2004. Grain number and its relationship with dry matter, N and P in the spikes at heading in response to N × P fertilization in barley. Field Crops Res (In press).
Savin R. & G.A. Slafer, 1991. Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinean wheat cultivar. J Agric Sci 116: 1–7.
Scarth, R. & C.N. Law, 1983. The location of the photoperiod gene, Ppd2 and an additional genetic factor for ear-emergence time on chromosome 2B of wheat. Heredity 51: 607–619.
Scarth, R. & C.N. Law, 1984. The control of the day-length response in wheat by group 2 chromosomes. Z Pflanzenzüchtg 92: 140–150.
Scarth, R., E.J.M. Kirby & C.N. Law, 1985. Effects of the photoperiod genes Ppd1 and Ppd2 on growth and development of the shoot apex in wheat. Ann Bot 55: 351–359.
Siddique, K.H.M., E.J.M. Kirby & M.W. Perry, 1989. Ear:stem ratio in old and modern wheat varieties, relationship with improvement in number of grains per ear and yield. Field Crops Res 21: 59–78.
Snape, J.W., K. Butterworth, E. Whitechurch & A.J. Worland, 2001. Waiting for the fine times: Genetics of flowering time in wheat. Euphytica 119: 185–190.
Slafer, G.A., 1995. Reproductive development of wheat under different thermal and photoperiodic environments. PhD Thesis. Department of Agriculture, Univ. of Melbourne, Australia, pp. 204.
Slafer, G.A., 2003. Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist's perspective. Ann Appl Biol 142: 117–128.
Slafer, G.A. & F.H. Andrade, 1993. Physiological attributes related to the generation of grain yield in bread wheat cultivars released at different eras. Field Crops Res 31: 351–367.
Slafer, G.A. & H.M. Rawson, 1994. Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors: A re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modellers. Aust J Plant Physiol 21: 393–426.
Slafer, G.A & H.M. Rawson, 1996. Responses to photoperiod change with phenophase and temperature during wheat development. Field Crops Res 46: 1–13.
Slafer, G.A. & H.M. Rawson, 1997. Phyllochron in wheat as affected by photoperiod under two temperature regimes. Aust J Plant Physiol 24, 151–158.
Slafer, G.A., F.H. Andrade & E.H. Satorre, 1990. Genetic-improvement effects on pre-anthesis physiological attributes related to wheat grain yield. Field Crops Res 23: 255–263.
Slafer, G.A., D.F. Calderini & D.J. Miralles, 1996. Yield components and compensation in wheat: opportunities for further increasing yield potential. In: M.P. Reynolds, S. Rajaram & A. McNab (Eds.). Increasing yield potential in wheat: breaking the barriers, CIMMYT, Mexico DF, pp. 101–133.
Slafer, G.A., J.L. Araus & R.A. Richards, 1999. Physiological traits to increase the yield potential of wheat. In E.H. Satorre & G.A. Slafer (eds.), Wheat: Ecology and Physiology of Yield Determination, Food Product Press, New York, pp. 379–415.
Slafer, G.A., L.G. Abeledo, D.J. Miralles, F.G. González & E.M. Whitechurch, 2001. Photoperiod sensitivity during stem elongation as an avenue to raise potential yield in wheat. Euphytica 119: 191–197.
Stapper, M. & R.A. Fischer, 1990. Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales. I. Phasic development, canopy growth and spike production. Aust J Agric Res 41: 997–1019.
Stelmakh, A.F., 1998. Genetic systems regulating flowering response in wheat. Euphytica 100: 359–369.
Stockman, Y.M., R.A. Fischer & E.G. Brittain, 1983. Assimilate supply and floret development within the spike of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust J Plant Physiol 10: 585–594.
Thorne, G.N. & D.W. Wood, 1987. Effects of radiation and temperature on tiller survival, grain number and grain yield in winter wheat. Ann Bot 59: 413–426.
Waddington, S.R., P.M. Cartwright & P.C. Wall, 1983. A quantitative scale of spike initial and pistil development in barley and wheat. Ann Bot 51: 119–130.
Welsh, J.R., D.L. Pirasteh & R.D. Richards, 1973. Genetic control of photoperiod response in wheat. Proc. 4{th} International Wheat Genetic Symposuim, Missouri, pp. 879–884.
Whitechurch, E.M. & G.A. Slafer, 2001. Response to photoperiod before and after jointing in wheat substitution lines. Euphytica 118: 47–51.
Whitechurch, E.M. & G.A. Slafer, 2002. Contrasting Ppd alleles in wheat: Effects on sensitivity to photoperiod in different phases. Field Crops Res 73: 95–105.
Worland, A.J., 1996. The influence of flowering time genes on environmental adaptability in European wheats. Euphytica 89: 49–57.
Worland, A.J., S. Petrovic & C.N. Law, 1988. Genetic analysis of chromosome 2D of wheat. II. The importance of this chromosome to Yugoslavian varieties. Plant Breeding 100: 247–259.
Worland, A.J., A. Börner, V. Kozun, W.M. Li, S. Petrovic & E.J. Sayres, 1998. The influence of photoperiod genes on the adaptability of European winter wheats. Euphytica 100: 385–394.
Youssefian, S., E.J.M. Kirby & M.D. Gale, 1992. Pleiotropic effects of the G.A. insensitive Rht dwarfing gene in wheat. 2. Effects on leaf, stem, ear and floret growth. Field Crops Res 28: 191–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González, F.G., Slafer, G.A. & Miralles, D.J. Pre-anthesis development and number of fertile florets in wheat as affected by photoperiod sensitivity genes Ppd-D1and Ppd-B1 . Euphytica 146, 253–269 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-9021-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-9021-3