Abstract
This paper empirically examines the effect of inclusion in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index (DJSI World) on corporate financial performance. On the basis of panel data for European firms that were included in the Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index over time, our micro-econometric analysis with fixed and random effects models implies positive impacts on return on assets for continental European countries, but insignificant effects for Anglo-Saxon European countries (i.e., the United Kingdom and Ireland). Furthermore, the impacts on alternative indicators of corporate financial performance such as Tobin’s Q are generally insignificant. The weak or neutral effect of inclusion in the DJSI World on corporate financial performance can be explained by several mutually confounding factors. Furthermore, the composition of this sustainability stock index is influenced by factors that need not necessarily be directly connected to corporate environmental or social activities, so that potential positive and negative effects of corporate sustainability performance on financial performance can be weakened. Methodologically, this study again supports the strong relevance of unobserved firm heterogeneity since the application of misspecified pooled regression models leads to obviously biased estimation results.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arellano M, Bond SR (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297
Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2006) Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 27: 1101–1122
Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17: 99–120
Bauer R, Koedijk K, Otten R (2005) International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. J Bank Finance 29: 1751–1767
Becchetti L, Di Giacomo S, Pinnacchio D (2008) Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from a panel of US listed companies. Appl Econ 40: 541–567
Bond SR (2002) Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. Portugese Econ J 1: 141–162
Cañón-de-Francia J, Garcés-Ayerbe C (2009) ISO 14001 environmental certification: a sign valued by the market?. Environ Resour Econ 44: 245–262
Chung KH, Pruitt SW (1994) A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financ Manag 23: 70–74
Curran MM, Moran D (2007) Impact of the FTSE4Good index on firm price: an event study. J Environ Manag 82: 529–537
Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Nlandu M (2001) Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. J Environ Econ Manag 42: 310–335
Derwall J, Guenster N, Bauer R, Koedijk K (2005) The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financ Anal J 61: 51–63
Elsayed K, Paton D (2005) The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: static and dynamic panel data evidence. Struct Change Econ Dyn 16: 395–412
Filbeck G, Gorman RF (2004) The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environ Resour Econ 29: 137–157
Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 Sept 1970
Guenster N, Bauer R, Derwall J, Koedijk K (2011) The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. Eur Financ Manag (forthcoming)
Gupta S, Goldar B (2005) Do stock markets penalize environment-unfriendly behaviour? Evidence from India. Ecol Econ 52: 81–95
Hart SL, Ahuja G (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ 5: 30–37
Heal G (2005) Corporate social responsibility: an economic and financial framework. Geneva Pap 30: 387–409
Hirsch BT, Seaks TG (1993) Functional form in regression models of Tobin’s Q. Rev Econ Stat 75: 381–385
Kempf A, Osthoff P (2007) The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. Eur Financ Manag 13: 908–922
Khanna M, Quimo WR, Bojilova D (1998) Toxics release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. J Environ Econ Manag 36: 243–266
King A, Lenox M (2001) Does it really pay to be green?. J Ind Ecol 5: 105–116
King A, Lenox M (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Manag Sci 48: 289–299
Koellner T, Suh S, Weber O, Moser C, Scholz RW (2007) Environmental impacts of conventional and sustainable investment funds compared using input–output life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 11: 41–60
Konar S, Cohen MA (1997) Information as regulation: the effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. J Environ Econ Manag 32: 109–124
Konar S, Cohen MA (2001) Does the market value environmental performance. Rev Econ Stat 83: 281–289
Lindenberg E, Ross S (1981) Tobin’s Q ratio and industrial organization. J Bus 54: 1–32
McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strateg Manag J 21: 603–609
McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26: 117–127
McWilliams A, Siegel D, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud 43: 1–18
Orlitzky M (2001) Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm performance. J Bus Ethics 33: 167–180
Posnikoff JF (1997) Disinvestment from South Africa: they did well by doing good. Contemp Econ Policy 15: 76–86
Renneboog L, Horst JT, Zhang C (2008) Socially responsible investments: institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. J Bank Finance 32: 1723–1742
Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40: 534–559
Schröder M (2007) Is there a difference? The performance characteristics of SRI equity indices. J Bus Finance Acc 34: 331–348
Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Finance 52: 737–783
Telle K (2006) “It pays to be green”—a premature conclusion?. Environ Resour Econ 35: 195–220
Tirole J (2006) The theory of corporate finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Waddock S, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance—financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18: 303–319
Ziegler A, Schröder M (2010) What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for European companies. Ecol Econ 29: 848–856
Ziegler A, Schröder M, Rennings K (2007) The effect of environmental and social performance on the stock performance of European corporations. Environ Resour Econ 37: 661–680
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegler, A. Is it Beneficial to be Included in a Sustainability Stock Index? A Panel Data Study for European Firms. Environ Resource Econ 52, 301–325 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9529-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9529-z
Keywords
- Sustainability stock index
- Corporate environmental and social activities
- Corporate financial performance
- Panel data
- Unobserved firm heterogeneity