Abstract
We examine the ‘resource curse’ using new data on historic resource stocks and an improved econometric methodology. The paper distinguishes between resource abundance (stocks) and extractive intensity (flows), focusing on relationships between resources and rule of law. Previously unavailable information on past resource stocks is estimated. We find that economically large initial natural resource stocks are associated with subsequent lower levels of rule of law and do not directly affect growth, while raw resource exports do not have a significant effect on rule of law when stocks are included in the analysis but do affect average growth rates. Sample size is maximized through the use of an EMis (expectation maximization with importance sampling) algorithm to replace missing data, minimizing the bias and inefficiency associated with listwise deletion, which commonly eliminates half or more of the available data in this setting.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development. Am Econ Rev 2001: 1369–1401
Aixala J, Fabro G (2007) A model of growth augmented with institutions. Econ Aff 27(3): 71–74
Bar-Hen A (2002) Influence of missing data on compact designs for spacing experiments. J Appl Stat 29(8): 1229–1240
Barro RJ (1999) Determinants of democracy. J Polit Econ, Part 2, S158–S183
Brunnschweiler CN, Bulte E (2008) The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings. J Environ Econ Manage 55(3):248–264
Bulte EH, Damania R, Deacon RT (2005) Resource intensity, institutions, and development. World Dev 33(7): 1029–1044
Conning JH, Robinson JA (2007) Property rights and the political organization of agriculture. J Dev Econ 82(2): 416–447
Cuddington J (1992) Long-run trends in 26 primary commodity prices: a disaggregated look at the Prebisch–Singer hypothesis. J Dev Econ 39: 207–227
DeCanio SJ, Watkins WE (1998) Investment in energy efficiency: do the characteristics of firms matter?. Rev Econ Stat 80: 95–107
Ding N, Field BC (2005) Natural resource abundance and economic growth. Land Econ 81(4): 496–502
Durlauf SN (2001) Econometric analysis and the study of economic growth: a skeptical perspective. In: Backhouse RE, Salanti A (eds) Macroeconomics and the real world: econometric techniques and macroeconomics.. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Easterly W, Levine R (2003) Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development. J Monetary Econ 50: 3–39
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1977) Production yearbook volume 30, 1976. FAO statistics series No. 7, Rome
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1996) Production yearbook volume 49, 1995. FAO statistics series No. 130, Rome
Gylfason T (2001) Natural resources, education, and economic development. Eur Econ Rev 45: 847–859
Gylfason T, Herbertsson TT, Zoega G (1999) A mixed blessing: natural resources and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dyn 3: 204–225
Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Q J Econ 114: 83–116
Hodler R (2006) The curse of natural resources in fractionalized countries. Eur Econ Rev 50: 1367–1386
Honaker J, Joseph A, King G, Scheve K, Singh N (2001) Amelia: a program for missing data (Windows Version). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. http://Gking.Harvard.edu/
Hubbard M (1997) The ‘New Institutional Economics’ in agricultural development: insights and challenges. J Agric Econ 48(2): 239–249
Imai K, Weinstein J (2000) Measuring the economic impact of civil war. Harvard University Center for international development working paper series, No. 51
Isham J, Woolcock M, Pritchett L, Busby G (2005) The varieties of resource experience: natural resource export structures and the political economy of economic growth. World Bank Econ Rev 19(2): 141–174
Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2003) Governance matters III: governance indicators for 1996–2002. World Bank Policy Research Department working paper
King G, Honaker J, Joseph A, Scheve K (2001) Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. Am Polit Sci Rev 95(1): 49–69
Knabb SD (2005) The contribution of institutions, trade, and geography to the development process: how robust is the empirical evidence to variations in the sample?. Empir Econ 30(2): 393–409
Kofman P, Sharpe IG (2003) Using multiple imputation in the analysis of incomplete observations in finance. J Financ Econom 1(2): 216–249
Leite C, Weidmann J (1999) Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. Working paper of the International Monetary Fund, WP/99/85
Mehlum H, Moene C, Torvik R (2006) Institutions and the resource curse. Econ J 116: 1–20
North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F (2004) Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over integration and geography in economic development. J Econ Growth 9(2): 131–165
Rosenberg N, Birdzell LE Jr (1986) How the west grew rich. Basic Books, New York
Ross ML (1999) The political economy of the resource curse. World Polit 51(2): 297–322
Rubin DB (1996) Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 91(434): 473–489
Sachs J, Warner A (1995a) Economic convergence and economic policy. NBER working paper No. 5039. NBER, Cambridge, MA
Sachs J, Warner A (1995b) Natural resource abundance and economic growth. Development discussion paper No. 517a, Harvard Institute for International Development
Sachs J, Warner A (1999) The big push, natural resource booms and growth. J Dev Econ 59: 43–76
Sachs J, Warner A (2001) The curse of natural resources, with Andrew Warner. Eur Econ Rev 45: 827–838
Sala-i-Martin X, Subramanian A (2003) Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria. NBER working paper No. 9804. NBER, Cambridge
Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G, Miller RI (2004) Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Am Econ Rev 94(4): 813–835
Stevens P (2003) Resource impact: curse or blessing? A literature survey. J Energy Lit IX(1): 3–42
Stijns JC (2005) Natural resource abundance and economic growth revisited. Resour Policy 30(2): 107–130
United States Department of the Interior and United States Geological Survey (2003) Mineral commodity summaries 2003. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Watkins MH (1988) A staple theory of economic growth. In: Easterbrook WT, Watkins MH (eds) Approaches to Canadian economic history. Carleton library series #31, Carleton University Press, Ottawa
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this work appeared as part of my doctoral dissertation in economics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Thanks are due to my dissertation committee: Robert T. Deacon, Stephen J. DeCanio and Carol McAusland; as well as Okan Kavuncu, Henning Bohn, Kelly Bedard, Olivier Deschennes, Doug Steigerwald and numerous seminar participants as well as two anonymous referees.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norman, C.S. Rule of Law and the Resource Curse: Abundance Versus Intensity. Environ Resource Econ 43, 183–207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9231-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9231-y