Abstract
This paper describes a procedure to use a model interactively to investigate future land use by studying a wide range of scenarios defining climate, technological and socio-economic changes. A full model run of several hours has been replaced by a metamodel version which takes a few seconds, and provides the user with an immediate visual output and with the ability to examine easily which factors have the greatest effect. The Regional Impact Simulator combines a model of agricultural land use choices linked with models of urban growth, flooding risk, water quality and consequences for wildlife to estimate plausible futures of agricultural land on a timescale of 20–50 years. The model examines the East Anglian and North West regions of the United Kingdom at a grid resolution of 5 × 5 km, and for each scenario estimates the most likely cropping and its profitability at each location, and classifies land use as arable, intensive or extensive grassland or abandoned. From a modelling viewpoint the metamodel approach enables iteration. It is thus possible to determine how product prices change so that production meets demand. The results of the study show that in East Anglia cropping remains quite stable over a wide range of scenarios, though grassland is eliminated in scenarios with the 2050s High climate scenario – almost certainly due to the low yield in the drier conditions. In the North West there is a very much greater range of outcomes, though all scenarios suggest a reduction in grassland with the greatest in the 2050s High climate scenario combined with the “Regional Stewardship” (environmental) socio-economic scenario. The effects of the predicted changes in land use on plant species showed suitability for species to vary greatly, particularly between the socio-economic scenarios, due to detrimental effects from increases in nitrogen fertilisation. A complete simulation with the Regional Impact Simulator takes around 15 seconds (computer-dependent), which users who responded felt was adequate or better than adequate. The main areas for future improvement, such as the speed of the system, user interaction and the accuracy and detail of the modelling, are considered.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ABC (2005) The agricultural budgeting and costing book. Agro Business Consultants Ltd, Melton Mowbray
Annetts JE, Audsley E (2002) Multiple objective linear programming for environmental farm planning. J Oper Res Soc 53:933–943
Audsley E, Pearn KR, Simota C, Cojocaru G, Koutsidou E, Rounsevell MDA, Trnka M, Alexandrov V (2006) What can scenario modelling tell us about future European scale agricultural land use, and what not? Environ Sci Policy 9:148–162
BAP (1995) Biodiversity: the UK steering group report – volume II: action plans (December 1995, Tranche 1, Vol 2, p235. HMSO London. http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=8
Berry PM, Rounsevell MDA, Harrison PA, Audsley E (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation. Environ Sci Policy 9:189–204
Critchley CNR, Burke MJW, Stevens DP (2004) Conservation of lowland semi-natural grasslands in the UK: a review of botanical monitoring results from agri-environment schemes. Biol Conserv 115:263–278
de Nijs TCM, de Niet R, Crommentuijn L (2004) Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030. J Environ Manag 72:35–42
Defra (2004) June census data. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49
Froud-Williams RJ (1985) The biology of cleavers (Galium aparine). In: Aspects of applied biology 9, the biology and control of weeds in cereals. AAB, Wellesbourne, pp 189–195
Genstat (2002) Genstat for windows, 6th edn. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK
Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman Ltd, London, p 742
Harrison PA, Berry PM, Butt N, New M (2006) Modelling climate change impacts on species. Distributions at the European scale: implications for conservation policy. Environ Sci Policy 9:116–128
Henriques C, Holman IP, Audsley E, Pearn K (2008) An interactive multi-scale integrated assessment of future regional water availability for agricultural irrigation in East Anglia and North West England. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9459-0
Hill MO, Mountford JO, Roy DB, Bunce RGH (1999) Ellenberg’s indicator values for British plants. Ecofact volume 2 technical annex, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology/Department of Environment Transport and the Regions, p 46
Holman IP, Harman J (this issue) Preliminary evaluation of the benefits of a participatory regional integrated assessment software. Climatic Change
Holman IP, Rounsevell MDA, Cojacaru G, Shackley S, McLachlan C, Audsley E, Berry PM, Fontaine C, Harrison PA, Henriques C, Mokrech M, Nicholls RJ, Pearn KR, Richards JA (2008) The concepts and development of a participatory regional integrated assessment tool. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9453-6
Holman IP, Rounsevell MDA, Shackley S, Harrison PA, Nicholls RJ, Berry PM, Audsley E (2005a) A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK part I, Methodology. Climate Change 71:9–41
Holman IP, Nicholls RJ, Berry PM, Harrison PA, Audsley E, Shackley S, Rounsevell MDA (2005b) A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK, part II, Results. Climate Change 71:43–73
Hossell JE, Jones PJ, Marsh JS, Parry ML, Rehman T, Tranter RB (1996) The likely effects of climate change on agricultural land use in England and Wales. Geoforum 27:149–157
Hulme M, Jenkins GJ (1998) Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: scientific report. UK climate impacts programme technical report no. 1, Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, p 80
Hulme M, Jenkins GJ, Lu X, Turnpenny JR, Mitchell TD, Jones RG, Lowe J, Murphy JM, Hassell D, Boorman P, McDonald R, Hill S (2002) Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 scientific report. Tyndall centre for climate change research, school of environmental sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich
Koomen E, Kuhlman T, Groen J, Bouwman A (2005) Simulating the future of agricultural land use in The Netherlands. Tijdschrift Economische en Sociale Geografie 96:218–224
Lintell Smith G, Bayliss JM, Watkinson AR, Firbank LF (1992) The effects of reduced nitrogen and weed competition on the populations of three common cereal weeds. Asp Appl Biol 30:367–372
Lintell Smith G, Freckelton RP, Firbank LF, Watkinson AR (1999) The population dynamics of Anisantha sterilis in winter wheat (comparative demography and the role of management. J Appl Ecol 36:455–471
Lutman PJW, Thornton ME, Lovegrove AW (1988) Control of Galium aparine in winter cereals with mecoprop alone or with ioxynil plus bromoxynil. Weed Res 28:331–338
Mackney D, Hodgson JM, Hollis JM, Staines SJ (1983) Legend for the 1:250,000 soil map of England and Wales. Soil survey of England and Wales, Harpenden [from contributions by the field staff]
Marshall J, Brown V, Boatman N, Lutman P, Squires G (2001) The impact of herbicides on weed abundance and biodiversity. PN0940, Pesticides Safety Directorate
McCloskey MC, Firbank LG, Watkinson AR, Webb DJ (1996) The dynamics of experimental arable weed communities under different management practices. J Veg Sci 7:799–808
Mountford JO, Lakhani KH, Holland RJ (1996) Reversion of grassland vegetation following the cessation of fertilizer application. J Veg Sci 7(2):219–228
Munier B, Birr-Pedersen K, Schou JS (2004) Combined ecological and economic modelling in agricultural land use scenarios. Ecol Model 174:5–18
Nix J (2004) Farm management pocketbook. Wye College, UK
Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42
Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Berry PM, Harrison PA (2002) SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecol Model 154:289–300
Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Lui C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27:285–298
Preston CD, Pearman DA, Dines TD (2002) New atlas of the British flora. Oxford University, Oxford, p 910
Qnetv (2000) Software package for windows. Vesta Services Inc, Winnetka, IL
Richards JA, Mokrech M, Berry PM, Nicholls RJ (this issue) Regional assessment of climate change impacts on coastal and fluvial ecosystems and the scope for adaptation. Climate Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9451-8
Rounsevell MDA, Annetts JE, Audsley E, Mayr T, Reginster I (2003) Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95(2–3):465–479
Stewart A, Pearman DA, Preston CD (1994) Scarce plants in Britain. J.N.C.C., Peterborough
Sutcliffe OL, Kay QON (2000) Changes in the arable flora of central southern England since the 1960s. Biol Conserv 93:1–8
Taylor K (1999) Biological flora of the British Isles. Galium aparine. J Ecol 87:713–730
Wilson P, King M (2003) Arable plants – a field guide. WildGuides
Zander P, Kachele H (1999) Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development. Agric Syst 59:311–325
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Audsley, E., Pearn, K.R., Harrison, P.A. et al. The impact of future socio-economic and climate changes on agricultural land use and the wider environment in East Anglia and North West England using a metamodel system. Climatic Change 90, 57–88 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9450-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9450-9