Abstract
Attitudes toward global warming are influenced by various heuristics, which may distort policy away from what is optimal for the well-being of people. These possible distortions, or biases, include: a focus on harms that we cause, as opposed to those that we can remedy more easily; a feeling that those who cause a problem should fix it; a desire to undo a problem rather than compensate for its presence; parochial concern with one’s own group (nation); and neglect of risks that are not available. Although most of these biases tend to make us attend relatively too much to global warming, other biases, such as wishful thinking, cause us to attend too little. I discuss these possible effects and illustrate some of them with an experiment conducted on the World Wide Web.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arrhenius, S.: 1896, ‘On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground’, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41, 237–276.
Baron, J.: 1998, Judgment misguided: Intuition and Error in Public Decision Making, New York: Oxford University Press.
Baron, J.: 2001, ‘Confusion of group-interest and self-interest in parochial cooperation on behalf of a group’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 45, 283–296.
Baron, J., Gowda, R., and Kunreuther, H. C.: 1993, ‘Attitudes toward managing hazardous waste: What should be cleaned up and who should pay for it?’, Risk Analysis 13, 183–192.
Baron, J., Schulkin, J., and Kunreuther, H.: 1990, ‘Perceived uncertainty and the response to global warming’, Unpublished article available at http://www.sas.upenn.edu/baron/green.htm.
Baron, J. and Ritov, I.: 1993, ‘Intuitions about penalties and compensation in the context of tort law’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 17–33.
Baron, J. and Schulkin, J.: 1995, ‘The problem of global warming from a decision-theoretic perspective’, Social Epistemology 9, 353–368.
Baron, J., Bazerman, M. H., and Shonk, K.: (2006), ‘Enlarging the societal pie through wise legislation: A psychological perspective’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 1, 123–132.
Bazerman, M. H., Baron, J., and Shonk, K.: 2001, You Can't Enlarge the Pie: The Psychology of Ineffective Government, New York: Basic Books.
Beattie, J. and Baron, J.: 1995, ‘In-kind vs. out-of-kind penalties: Preference and valuation’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1, 136–151.
Bornstein, G. and Ben-Yossef, M.: 1994, ‘Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30, 52–67.
Copenhagen Consensus: 2004, ‘Copenhagen Consensus 2004’, “http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com”
Dudoit, S. and Ge, Y.: 2003, ‘Bioconductor R packages for multiple hypothesis testing: Multtest’, http://www.bioconductor.org.
Kahneman, D., and Ritov, I.: 1994, ‘Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study of the headline method’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9, 5–38.
Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Jacowitz, K. E., and Grant, P.: 1993, ‘Stated willingness to pay for public goods: A psychological perspective’, Psychological Science 4, 310–315.
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., and Ratick, S.: 1988, ‘The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework’, Risk Analysis 8, 177–187.
Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., and Hartley, J. A.: 1995, Environmental Values in American Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kuran, T. and Sunstein, C. R.: 1999, ‘Availability cascades and risk regulation’, Stanford Law Review 51, 683–768.
Loewenstein, G. F. and Mather, J.: 1990, ‘Dynamic processes in risk perception’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3, 155–175.
Mahlman, J. D.: 1997, ‘Uncertainties in projections of human-caused global warming’, Science 278, 1416–1417.
McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J.: in press, ‘Thinking about tax’, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
Schelling, T. C.: 1992, ‘Some economics of global warming’, American Economic Review 82, 1–14.
Schelling, T. C.: 1996, ‘Global decisions for the very long term: Intergenerational and international discounting’, in Zeckhauser, R. J. Keeney, R. L. and Sebenius, J. K. (eds.), Wise Choices: Decisions, Games, and Negotiations, pp. 152–166. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Schwartz-Shea, P. and Simmons, R. T.: 1990, ‘The layered prisoners' dilemma: Ingroup vs. macro-efficiency’, Public Choice 65, 61–83.
Schwartz-Shea, P. and Simmons, R. T.: 1991, ‘Egoism, parochialism, and universalism’, Rationality and Society 3, 106–132.
Simon, J. L.: 1980, ‘Resources, population, environment: An oversupply of false bad news' Science 208, 1431–1437.
Singer, P.: 1982, The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Westfall, P. H., and Young, S. S.: 1993, Resampling-based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-value Adjustment. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Weyant, J. P.: 2004, ‘Introduction and overview [to special issue on global warming]’, Energy Economics 26, 501–515.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baron, J. Thinking About Global Warming. Climatic Change 77, 137–150 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9049-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9049-y