Abstract
Beginning with the question of who constitutes the firm, this article seeks to explore the historical evolution of concepts such as corporate social responsibility, corporate accountability, corporate social responsiveness, corporate social performance, stakeholder theory, and corporate citizenship. In close parallel to these changes are differences in interpretation from Anglo-American and Continental European perspectives. The author defends that the ultimate reasons behind these differences are of a philosophical nature, affecting both the anthropology and the political theory dominant in each of these cultures. Philosophically, anglo-american culture may be described as individualistic, legalistic, pragmatist and with an understanding of rights as freedom from state intervention. Continental European culture, on the other hand, is more community-oriented, more dependent on unwritten laws or customs, less results-driven or more appreciative of the intrinsic value of activities and with an understanding of rights as freedom to participate in social goods and decisions. In the end, a twist is introduced in the meaning of corporate citizenship: beyond referring to the firm as a citizen of the state, it now signifies and analyzes the rights and responsibilities of the different “citizens” comprising the corporate polity. This new proposal constitutes the author’s normative response to the initial research query.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aristotle: 1990, The Politics (Stephen Everson, ed.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Berle, A. and G. Means: 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (The Macmillan Company, New York) [Reprint, 1991, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, N. J.].
Bernstein, A.: 2004, ‘Online Extra: Nike’s New Game Plan for Sweatshops’, BusinessWeek Online, September 20. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_38/b3900011_mz001.htm. Accessed 25 October 2006.
Boatright, J.: 1999, Ethics in Finance (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA/Oxford).
Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper & Bros., New York).
Carroll, A. B.: 1979, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management (2nd ed.) (South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH).
Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons, July–August, pp. 39–48.
Charkham, J.: 1995, Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York).
Crane, A. and D. Matten: 2004, Business Ethics: A European Perspective (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York).
Crane, A., D. Matten and J. Moon: 2003, ‘Can Corporations be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society’, International Center for Corporate Social Responsibility (ICCSR) Research Paper Series, No 13, ISSN 1479-5116.
Davis, K. and R. Blomstrom: 1975, Business and Society: Environmental Responsibility (McGraw Hill, New York).
Dill, W.: 1958, ‘Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(4), 409-443.
Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications’, Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
Eells, R. and C. Walton: 1961, Conceptual Foundations of Business (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Ill).
Estes, R.: 1976, Corporate Social Accounting (John Wiley & Sons, New York/London/Sydney/Toronto).
European Commission: 2006, Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/index.htm. Accessed 14 August 2006.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: 2007, Co-determination. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emire/GERMANY/CODETERMINATION-DE.htm. Accessed 7 October 2008.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston).
Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.
Freeman, R. E.: 1998, ‘Stakeholder theory’, In Patricia Werhane and R. Edward Freeman (eds.) The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA/Oxford).
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, 13 September.
Göhner, R. and K. Bräunig: 2004, Modernising Co-determination. http://www.bda-online.de/www/bdaonline.nsf/id/523B899F182B4D74C1256FAC003EA175/$file/ModernisingCoDetermination.pdf. Accessed 7 October 2008.
Hans Böchler Stiftung: 2004, Representing the Workers’ Interest in the German Industry. Co-determination at Establishment and Board Level. http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/mb_2004_12_folien_english.pdf. Accessed 7 Octo- ber 2008.
Johnson & Johnson: 2006, ‘Our Credo’, http://www.jnj.com/our_company/our_credo/index.htm. Accessed 25 October 2006.
Mallenbaker.net: 2006, Companies in Crisis. What To Do When It All Goes Wrong. Johnson & Johnson and Tylenol. http://www.mallenbaker.net/csr/CSRfiles/crisis02.html. Accessed 25 October 2006.
Manville, B. and J. Ober: 2003, A Company of Citizens. What the World’s First Democracy Teaches Leaders about Creating Great Organizations (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).
Mason, R. O. and I. I. Mitroff: 1982, Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions (John Wiley and Sons, New York).
Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424.
McGuire, J. W.: 1963, Business and Society (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Monks, R. and N. Minow: 2001, Corporate Governance (Blackwell Publishers: Oxford/Malden, MA).
Nasi, J.: 1995, Understanding Stakeholder Thinking (LSR-Julkaisut Oy, Helsinki).
Phillips, R.: 2008, ‘European and American perspectives on corporate social responsibility’, Business Ethics. A European Review, 17(1), January, 69-73.
Sethi, S. P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of corporate social responsibility’, California Management Review, 17, 58-64.
Sison, A. J. G.: 2000, ‘Integrated risk management and global business ethics’, Business Ethics. A European Review, 9(4), October, 288-295.
Stokes, G.: 2002, ‘Democracy and Citizenship’, In April Carter and Geoffrey Stokes (eds.) Democratic Theory Today (Polity Press, Cambridge).
The Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs: 1980, Mitbestimmung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bonn.
Thompson, J. D.: 1967, Organization in Action (McGraw Hill, New York).
Vietnam Labor Watch: 1997, ‘Nike Labor Practices in Vietnam’, http://www.saigon.com/~nike/reports/report1.html. Accessed 25 October 2006.
Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate social performance revisited’, Academy of Management Review, 16: 691-718.
Wood, D. J., J.M. Logsdon, P. G. Lewellyn and K. Davenport: 2006, Global Business Citizenship. A Transformative Framework for Ethics and Sustainable Capitalism (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY/London, England).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sison, A.J.G. From CSR to Corporate Citizenship: Anglo-American and Continental European Perspectives. J Bus Ethics 89 (Suppl 3), 235–246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0395-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0395-3