Abstract
Purpose Although current literature assumes positive outcomes for stakeholders resulting from an increase in power associated with CSR, this research suggests that this increase can lead to conflict within organizations, resulting in almost complete inactivity on CSR. Methods A Single in-depth case study, focusing on power as an embedded concept. Results Empirical evidence is used to demonstrate how some actors use CSR to improve their own positions within an organization. Resource dependence theory is used to highlight why this may be a more significant concern for CSR. Conclusions Increasing power for CSR has the potential to offer actors associated with it increased personal power, and thus can attract opportunistic actors with little interest in realizing the benefits of CSR for the company and its stakeholders. Thus power can be an impediment to furthering CSR strategy and activities at the individual and organizational level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abel, C. (2005). Beyond the Mainstream: Foucault, Power and Organization Theory. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 8(4), 495–519
Adam, A. and Rachman-Moore, D. (2004). The Methods Used to Implement an Ethical Code of Conduct and Employee Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics 54, 225–244
Aguilera, R. and Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2004. Codes of Good Governance Worldwide: What is the Trigger?. Organization Studies, 25(3), 415–443
Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C. and Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 836–863
Atwater, L. (1995). The Relationship Between Supervisory Power and Organizational Characteristics. Group & Organization Management, 20(4), 460–485
Baker, M. (2001). Selecting a Research Methodology. The Marketing Review, 1, 373–397
Baker, M. (2002). Research Methods. The Marketing Review, 3, 167–193
Bloodgood, J. and Morrow, J. (2003). Strategic Organizational change: Exploring the Roles of Environmental Structure, Internal conscious Awareness and Knowledge. Journal of Management Studies, 40(7), 1761–1782
Blowfield, M. (2004). Implementation Deficits of Ethical Trade Systems. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 77–90
Bonoma, T. (1985). Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 199–208
Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 419–430
Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. England: Gower Publishing
Campling, J. and Mitchelson, G. (1998). A Strategic Choice-Resource Dependence Analysis of Union Mergers in the British and Australian Broadcasting and Film Industries. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 579–600
Carlisle, Y. and Faulkner, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stages Framework. European Business Journal, 16(4), 143–152
Casciaro, T. and Jan Piskorski, M. (2005). Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167–199
Corcoran, D. and Shackman, J. (2007). A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Value of Beyond Compliance Occupational Health and Safety Programs. Journal of Business Strategies, 24(1), 49–68
Cramer, J. (2005). Experiences with Structuring Corporate Social Responsibility in Dutch Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 583–592
Crane, A. (2000). Corporate Greening as Amoralization. Organization Studies, 21(4), 673–696
Daily, C. and Dalton, D. (1994). Corporate Governance and the Bankrupt Firm: An Empirical Assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 643–654
Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322
EFQM: n.d., ‹The EFQM Excellence Model. European Foundation for Quality Management’, www.efqm.org/Default.aspx?tabid=35. Accessed 29 June 2005
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21 st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone
Faubion, J. (ed.): 1994, Michel Foucault: Power (The New Press, New York, NY)
Fiol, C., O’Connor, E. and Aguinis, H. (2001). All for One and One for All? The Development and Transfer of Power Across Organizational Levels. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 224–242
French, J. and Raven, B. (1959). The Basis of Social Power. In Cartwright, D. (ed) Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbour Michigan: University of Michigan Press
Frenkel, S. (2001). Globalization, Athletic Footwear Commodity Chains and Employment Relations in China. Organization Studies, 22(4), 531–562
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205
Furnham, A. (2005). The Psychology of Behaviour at Work: The Individual in the Organization (2e). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press
Gales, L. and Kesner, I. (1994). An Analysis of Board of Director Size and Composition in Bankrupt Organizations. Journal of Business Research, 30, 271–282
Garavan, T., Barnicle, B., and Hearty, N. (1993). The Training and Development Function: Its Search for power and Influence in Organizations. Journal of European Industrial Training, 17(7), 22–32
Garriga, E. and Mele, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71
Gaventa, J. and Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and Knowledge. In Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds) (2001). The Handbook of Action Research. London, England: Sage
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Edison NJ: Aldine Transaction
Gordon, R. (2005), An Empirical Investigation into the Power Behind Empowerment. Organization Management Journal, 2(3), 144–165
Government of Canada: 2006, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide for Canadian Business’, Government of Canada, Ottawa. http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/incsr-rse.nsf/vwapj/CSR_mar2006.pdf/$FILE/CSR_mar2006.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2006
Greening, D. and Gray, B. (1994). Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467–498
Hamann, R. and Acutt, N. (2003). How Should Civil Society (and the Government) Respond to ‹Corporate Social Responsibility’? A Critique of Business Motivations and the Potential for Partnerships. Development South Africa, 20(2), 255–270
Hardy, C. and Leiba-O’Sullivan, S. (1998). The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice. Human Relations, 51(4), 451–483
Hillman, A., Cannella, A. and Paetzold, R. (2000). The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–255
Hilton, S. (2003). How Brands Can Change the World. Brand Management, 10(4–5), 370–377
Hingley, M. (2005). Power to all our friends? Living with imbalance in supplier-retailer relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 848–858
Hosking, D. and Morley, I. (1991). A Social Psychology of Organizing. Hemel Hempstead UK: Wheatsheaf
Hrebiniak, L. and Joyce, W. (1985). Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 336–349
Kim, P., Pinkley, R. and Fragale, A. (2005). Power Dynamics in Negotiation. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 799–822
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., and Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One’s Way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 440–452
Kotter, J.: 1977, ‹Power, Dependence, and Effective Management’, Harvard Business Review 55(6) July/August, 125–136
Kumar, N. (2005). The Power of Power in Supplier-retailer Relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 863–866
Labour Behind the Label: n.d., ‹Company Codes of Conduct: What Do They Mean for Workers in the Garment and Sportswear Industries?’, Labour Behind the Label. www.labourbehindthelabel.org/publications/codesbriefingpaper.doc. Accessed 17 March 2004
Lueger, M., Sandner, K., Meyer, R. And Hammerschmid, G. (2005). Contextualizing Influence Activities: An Objective Hermeutical Approach. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1145–1168
Lukes, S. (1974). Power a Radical View. London, England: Macmillian Press
Maignan, I., Ralston, D. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-Presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514
Mamic, I. (2004). Implementing Codes of Conduct: How Businesses Manage Social Performance in Global Supply Chains. London, England: Greenleaf Publishing
Mason. J. (2002). Qualitative Interviewing: Asking, Listening and Interpreting. In May, T. (ed), Qualitative Research in Action (pp. 225–241). London, England: Sage
McKenna, E. (2000). Business Psychology and Organizational Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall
Meehan, J., Meehan, K. and Richards, A. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: the 3C-SR Model. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 386–398
Mintzberg, H. (1979). An Emerging Strategy of ‹Direct’ Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 582–589
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power In and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall
Miles, B., and Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book (2e). Thousand Oaks California: Sage
Nelson, M.: 1999, The Challenge of Implementing Codes of Conduct in Local Government Authorities. Paper Presented at 9th International Anti-Corruption Conference, 10–15 October, Durban, South Africa
Newell, P. (2005). Citizenship, Accountability and Community: the Limits of the CSR Agenda. International Affairs, 81(3), 541–557
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179
Pettigrew, A. (1973). The Politics of Organizational Decision-making. London, England: Routledge
Pettigrew, A. (1977). Strategy Formation as a Political Process. International Studies of Management and Organization, 7(2), 78–87
Pettigrew, S. (2000). Ethnography and Grounded Theory: A Happy Marriage?. Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 256–260
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman
Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik: 1978/2003, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford University Press, Stanford, California)
Ragins, B. (1997). Diversified Mentoring Relationships in Organizations: A Power Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 482–521
Richardson, L. and Swan, J. (1997). Unexcercised Channel Power Related to the Costs of Using Different Types of Power Sources. The Journal of Marketing Management, 7(2), 56–69
Salancik, G. and J. Pfeffer: 1977, ‹Who Gets Power – And How They Hold on to It: A Strategic-Contingency Model of Power’, Organizational Dynamics 5, 2–21
Scholz, R. & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. London, England: Sage
Schwandt, T. (2000). Three Epistemological Stances for Qualitative Inquiry: Interpretivism, Hermeneutics, and Social Constructionism. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research (2 nd ed.) (pp. 189–213). London, England: Sage
Sethi, S. P. (2002). Standards for Corporate Conduct in the International Arena: Challenges and Opportunities for Multinational Corporations. Business and Society Review, 107(1), 20–40
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 491–503
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Toren, C. (1996). Ethnography: Theoretical Background. In Richardson, J. (ed), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Leicester, England: The British Psychological Society
van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press
van Marrewijk, M., Wuisman, I., De Cleyn, W., Timmers, J., Panapanaan, V. and Linnanen, L. (2004). A Phase-wise Development Approach to Business Excellence: Towards an Innovative, Stakeholder-oriented Assessment Tool for Organizational Excellence and CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 83–98
Veser, M. (2004). The Influence of Culture on Stakeholder Management: Social Policy Implementation in Multinational Corporations. Business & Society, 43(4), 426–436
Vinten, G. (1994). Participant Observation: A Model for Organizational Investigation?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 9(2), 30–38
Vredenburgh, D. and Brender, Y. (1988). The Hierarchical Abuse of Power in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1337–1347
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York, NY: Free Press
Whitmeyer, J. (2001). Measuring Power in Exchange Networks. Sociological Perspectives, 44(2), 141–162
Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114
Wood, G., Svensson, G., Singh, J., Carasco, E., and Callaghan, M. (2004). Implementing the Ethos of Corporate Codes of Ethics: Australia, Canada and Sweden. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(4), 389–403
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage
Yukl, G. and Falbe, C. (1991). Importance of Different Power Sources in Downward and Lateral Relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 416–423
Yukl, G. and Tracey, J. B. (1992). Consequences of Influence Tactics Used with Subordinates, Peers and the Boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525–535
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bondy, K. The Paradox of Power in CSR: A Case Study on Implementation. J Bus Ethics 82, 307–323 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9889-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9889-7