Skip to main content
Log in

Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease Using Trephines: Description of a New Technique and Long-Term Outcomes in 1,358 Patients

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study describes and reports the results of a new, minimally-invasive surgical technique for pilonidal disease.

Methods

From March 1993 to January 2003, 1,358 patients (out of a total of 1,435 patients) with symptomatic pilonidal disease underwent treatment in a military surgical clinic dedicated for pilonidal disease. Patients were operated on under local anesthesia, utilizing trephines to excise pilonidal pits and to débride underlying cavities and tracts.

Results

One thousand three hundred fifty-eight symptomatic patients participated in the study and were mostly male (84.3 percent) and the mean age 20.9 ± 3.6 years. Rates of postoperative infection, secondary bleeding, and early failure were 1.5, 0.2, and 4.4 percent, respectively. In patients with full postoperative clinical attendance, complete healing was observed within 3.4 ± 1.9 weeks. Phone interview included 1,165 patients (85.8 percent) with a mean follow-up interval of 6.9 ± 1.8 years. Recurrence rates after 1 year was 6.5 percent, 5 years was 13.2 percent, and 10 years was 16.2 percent. Mean time to recurrence was 2.7 ± 2.6 years postoperatively. The disease-free probability estimate was 93.5 percent at one year and 86.5 percent at 5 years.

Conclusions

Compared with frequently used pilonidal operations, the trephine technique is associated with a lower recurrence rate and a low postoperative morbidity rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet 1973;2:1414–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen-Mersh TG. Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment. Br J Surg 1990;77:123–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1458–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmebakk T, Nesbakken A. Surgery for pilonidal disease. Scand J Surg 2005;94:43–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patey DH, Scarff RW. Pathology of post anal pilonidal sinus. It’s bearing on treatment. Lancet 1946;2:484–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lord PH, Millar DM. Pilonidal sinus: a simple treatment. Br J Surg 1965;52:298–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Millar DM, Lord PH. The treatment of acute postanal pilonidal abscess. Br J Surg 1967;54:598–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bascom J. Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery 1980;87:567–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bascom J. Pilonidal disease: long- term results of follicle removal. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:800–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Notaras MJ. A review of three popular methods of treatment of postanal (pilonidal) sinus disease. Br J Surg 1970;57:886–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Doll D, Krueger CM, Schrank S, Dettmann H, Petersen S, Duesel W. Timeline of recurrence after primary and secondary pilonidal sinus surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1928–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davage ON. The origin of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinuses based on an analysis of four hundred sixty-three cases. Am J Pathol 1954;30:1191–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Senapati A, Cripps NP, Thompson MR. Bascom’s operation in the day-surgical management of symptomatic pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg 2000;87:1067–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards MH. Pilonidal sinus: a 5-year appraisal of the Millar-Lord treatment. Br J Surg 1977;64:867–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Bascom J. Pilonidal disease: long-term results of follicle removal. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:800–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Franckowiak JJ, Jackman RJ. The etiology of pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 1962;5:28–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lord PH, Millar DM. Pilonidal sinus: a simple treatment. Br J Surg 1965;52:298–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bascom J. Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery 1980;87:567–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doll D, Novotny A. Rothe R, et al. Methylene Blue halves the long-term recurrence rate in acute pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patey DH. The principles of treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Proc R Soc Med 1970;63:939–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moshe Gips M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Gips, M., Melki, Y., Salem, L. et al. Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease Using Trephines: Description of a New Technique and Long-Term Outcomes in 1,358 Patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1656–1663 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9329-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9329-x

Key words

Navigation