Skip to main content
Log in

Subcutaneous Gentamycin Implant to Reduce Wound Infections After Loop-Ileostomy Closure: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

BACKGROUND

After loop-ileostomy closure subcutaneous wound infection is the most frequent postoperative complication. Implantation of local antibiotics has been shown to reduce the incidence of wound infection after different surgical procedures, therefore, a subcutaneous application of a gentamycin implant may also decrease infection rate after ileostomy-closure.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a subcutaneous gentamycin–collagen implant to reduce wound infection after loop-ileostomy closure. Patients had the same perioperative treatment and standardized anastomotic and closure technique. A collagen sponge with gentamycin was used in the treatment group and an identical collagen implant without antibiotics was used in the placebo group.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (40 per group) were included. There was no difference between the groups with respect to demographics or in the postoperative course. The total wound infection rate was 10 percent with no difference between the gentamycin (n = 4) and the collagen group (n = 4) (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous implantation of a gentamycin sponge yields no clinically relevant reduction of the wound infection rate after loop-ileostomy closure so that routine use is not recommended in this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. AJ Mangram TC Horan ML Pearson LC Silver WR Jarvis (1999) ArticleTitleGuideline for prevention of surgical site infection Am J Infect Control 27 97–132 Occurrence Handle10196487 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70088-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3htl2htg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DP Edwards A Leppington-Clarke R Sexton RJ Heald BJ Moran (2001) ArticleTitleStoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial Br J Surg 88 360–3 Occurrence Handle11260099 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01727.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtVaqtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. KP Riesener W Lehnen M Hofer R Kasperk JC Braun V Schumpelick (1997) ArticleTitleMorbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment World J Surg 21 103–8 Occurrence Handle8943186 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900201 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC3c3mtFM%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H Hasegawa S Radley DG Morton MR Keighley (2000) ArticleTitleStapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy—a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 231 202–4 Occurrence Handle10674611 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200002000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jslSktA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A Kohler S Athanasiadis M Nafe (1994) ArticleTitlePostoperative results of colostoma and ileostoma closure—a retrospective analysis of 3 closure techniques with 182 patients Chirurg 65 529–32 Occurrence Handle8088208 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA2svit1Y%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DJ Hackam OD Rotstein (1995) ArticleTitleStoma closure and wound-infection - an evaluation of risk-factors Can J Surg 38 144–8 Occurrence Handle7728668 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB2crptlA%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M McDonald E Grabsch C Marshall A Forbes (1998) ArticleTitleSingle- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review ANZ J Surg 68 388–96 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3osV2itg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F Song AM Glenny (1998) ArticleTitleAntimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Br J Surg 85 1232–41 Occurrence Handle9752867 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00883.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvitlOruw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. TV Berne CN Griffith J Hill P Loguidice (1985) ArticleTitleColostomy wound closure Arch Surg 120 957–9 Occurrence Handle4015388 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB2M7gsFI%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. PC Shellito (1998) ArticleTitleComplications of abdominal stoma surgery Dis Colon Rectum 41 1562–72 Occurrence Handle9860339 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237308 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FnsFKrsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. HJ Rutten PH Nijhuis (1997) ArticleTitlePrevention of wound infection in elective colorectal surgery by local application of a gentamicin-containing collagen sponge Eur J Surg 578 IssueID(Suppl) 31–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. HR Rosen AP Marczell E Czerwenka MO Stierer H Spoula H Wasl (1991) ArticleTitleLocal gentamicin application for perineal wound-healing following abdominoperineal rectum excision Am J Surg 162 438–41 Occurrence Handle1951905 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90256-D Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D2Mbnt1E%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. G Guzman Valdivia Gomez TS Guerrero MC Lluck FJ Delgado (1999) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of collagen-gentamicin implant for treatment of “dirty” abdominal wounds World J Surg 23 123–7 Occurrence Handle9880419 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FpslWnsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. U Gruessner M Clemens PV Pahlplatz P Sperling J Witte HR Rosen (2001) ArticleTitleImprovement of perineal wound healing by local administration of gentamicin-impregnated collagen fleeces after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer Am J Surg 182 502–9 Occurrence Handle11754859 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00762-0 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXptFylsb4%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991

  16. Bandyopadhyay U, Biswas A. Non-parametric group sequential designs in randomized clinical trials. Aust NZ J Stat 2003; 45:367-76 (DOI: 10.1111/1467-842X.00290)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brant R. The calculations are the customary ones based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. In: Rosner B, ed. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 4th ed. Boston: Duxbury, 1995:208–72

  18. F Chen M Stuart (1996) ArticleTitleThe morbidity of defunctioning stomata ANZ J Surg 66 218–21 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1MvgtF0%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. PT Phang JM Hain JJ Perez-Ramirez RD Madoff BT Gemlo (1999) ArticleTitleTechniques and complications of ileostomy takedown Am J Surg 177 463–6 Occurrence Handle10414694 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00091-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzktFKlsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J Mortensen K Kraglund M Klaerke G Jaeger S Svane J Bone (1995) ArticleTitlePrimary suture of anorectal abscess. A randomized study comparing treatment with clindamycin vs. clindamycin and Gentacoll® Dis Colon Rectum 38 398–401 Occurrence Handle7720448 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02054229 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB3snos1w%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. RG Leyh C Bartels HH Sievers (1999) ArticleTitleAdjuvant treatment of deep sternal wound infection with collagenous gentamycin Ann Thorac Surg 68 1648–51 Occurrence Handle10585036 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00836-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFOgsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P Vogel J Lenz (1992) ArticleTitleTreatment of pilonidal sinus with excision and primary suture using a local, resorbable antibiotic carrier. Results of a prospective randomized study Chirurg 63 748–53 Occurrence Handle1395879 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD3M%2Fgtlw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A Stemberger H Grimm F Bader HD Rahn R Ascherl (1997) ArticleTitleLocal treatment of bone and soft tissue infections with the collagen-gentamicin sponge Eur J Surg 578 IssueID(Suppl) 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  24. R Tang HH Chen YL Wang et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRisk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients Ann Surg 234 181–9 Occurrence Handle11505063 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvlslymsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. P Bucher B Mermillod P Gervaz P Morel (2004) ArticleTitleMechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis Arch Surg 139 1359–64 Occurrence Handle15611462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Professor K.-D. Wernecke, Institute for Medical Biometry, Humboldt-University Berlin, for the statistics consultation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Haase M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Haase, O., Raue, W., Böhm, B. et al. Subcutaneous Gentamycin Implant to Reduce Wound Infections After Loop-Ileostomy Closure: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 2025–2031 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0164-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0164-z

Key words

Navigation