Abstract
An accurate mathematical representation of the mechanical behaviour of human skin is essential when simulating deformations occurring in the skin during body movements or clinical procedures. In this study constitutive stress–strain relationships based on experimental data from human skin in vivo were obtained. A series of multiaxial loading experiments were performed on the forearms of four age- and gender matched subjects. The tissue geometry, together with recorded displacements and boundary forces, were combined in an analysis using finite element modelling. A non-linear optimization technique was developed to estimate values for the material parameters of a previously published constitutive law, describing the stress–strain relationship as a non-linear anisotropic membrane. Ten sets of material parameters where estimated from the experiments, showing considerable differences in mechanical behaviour both between individual subjects as well as mirrored body locations on a single subject. The accuracy of applications that simulate large deformations of human skin could be improved by using the parameters found from the in vivo experiments as described in this study.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alexander H and Cook TH (1977). Accounting for natural tension in the mechanical testing of human skin. J Investigative Dermatol 69(3): 310–314
Augenstein KF, Cowan BR, LeGrice IJ, Nielsen PM and Young AA (2005). Method and apparatus for soft tissue material parameter estimation using tissue tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomechanical Eng 127(1): 148–157
Bischoff JE, Arruda EM and Grosh K (2000). Finite element modeling of human skin using an isotropic, nonlinear elastic constitutive model. J Biomechanics 33(6): 645–652
Charette PG, Hunter IW and Hunter PJ (1997a). Large deformation mechanical testing of biological membranes using speckle interferometry in transmission. I: Experimental apparatus. Appl Opt 36(10): 2238–2245
Charette PG, Hunter IW and Hunter PJ (1997b). Large deformation mechanical testing of biological membranes using speckle interferometry in transmission. II: Finite element modeling. Appl Opt 36(10): 2246–2251
Dahan S, Lagarde JM, Turlier V, Courrech L and Mordon S (2004). Treatment of neck lines and forehead rhytids with a nonablative 1540-nm Er:Glass Laser: a controlled clinical study combined with the measurement of the thickness and the mechanical properties of the skin. Dermatol Surgery 30(6): 872–880
Danielson DA (1973). Human skin as an elastic membrane. J Biomechanics 6(5): 539–546
Diridollou S, Berson M, Vabre V, Black D, Karlsson B, Auriol F, Gregoire JM, Yvon C, Vaillant L, Gall Y and Patat F (1998). An in vivo method for measuring the mechanical properties of the skin using ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 24(2): 215–224
Diridollou S, Black D, Lagarde JM, Gall Y, Berson M, Vabre V, Patat F and Vaillant L (2000). Sex- and site-dependent variations in the thickness and mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. Int J Cosmetic Sci 22(6): 421–435
Diridollou S, Vabre V, Berson M, Vaillant L, Black D, Lagarde JM, Gregoire JM, Gall Y and Patat F (2001). Skin ageing: changes of physical properties of human skin in vivo. Int J Cosmetic Sci 23: 353–362
Elsner P, Wilhelm D and Maibach HI (1990). Properties of human forearm and vulvar skin. Br J Dermatol 122(5): 607–614
Emery JL, Omens JH and McCulloch AD (1997). Strain softening in rat left ventricular myocardium. J Biomechanical Eng 119(1): 6–12
Escoffier C, de Rigal J, Rochefort A, Vasselet R, Leveque JL and Agache PG (1989). Age-related mechanical properties of human skin: an in vivo study. J Investigative Dermatol 93(3): 353–357
Hendriks FM, Brokken D, van Eemeren JTWM, Oomens CWJ, Baaijens FPT and Horsten JBAM (2003). A numerical-experimental method to characterize the non-linear mechanical behaviour of human skin. Skin Res Technol 9(3): 274–283
Hendriks FM, Brokken D, Oomens CWJ and Baaijens FPT (2004). Influence of hydration and experimental length scale on the mechanical response of human skin in vivo, using optical coherence tomography. Skin Res Technol 10(4): 231–241
Highley KR (1977). Frictional properties of skin. J Investigative Dermatol 69(3): 303–305
Humphrey JD (1995). Mechanics of the arterial wall: review and directions. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 23(1–2): 1–162
Kirton RS, Taberner AJ, Young AA, Nielsen PM and Loiselle DS (2004). Strain softening is not present during axial extensions of rat intact right ventricular trabeculae in the presence or absence of 2,3-butanedione monoxime. Am J Physiol Heart Circulatory Physiol 286(2): H708–715
Langer K (1861) On the anatomy and physiology of the skin I-IV. Sitzungsbericht der Academie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Translated and reprinted: (1978). Br J Plastic Surgery 31:3–8, 93–106, 185–199, 273–278
Lanir Y (1983). Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J Biomechanics 16(1): 1–12
Lanir Y and Fung YC (1974a). Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. I. Experimental system. J Biomechanics 7(1): 29–34
Lanir Y and Fung YC (1974b). Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. II. Experimental results. J Biomechanics 7(2): 171–182
Malcolm DT, Nielsen PM, Hunter PJ and Charette PG (2002). Strain measurement in biaxially loaded inhomogeneous, anisotropic elastic membranes. Biomechanics Model Mechanobiol 1(3): 197–210
Nielsen PM, Hunter PJ and Smaill BH (1991). Biaxial testing of membrane biomaterials: testing equipment and procedures. J Biomechanical Eng 113(3): 295–300
Nielsen PM, Malcolm DT, Hunter PJ and Charette PG (2002). Instrumentation and procedures for estimating the constitutive parameters of inhomogeneous elastic membranes. Biomechanics Model Mechanobiol 1(3): 211–218
Payne PA (1991). Measurement of properties and function of skin. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 12(2): 105–129
Peacock LJ, Lawrence WJ, Peacock EE (1996) Wound healing. The physiological basis of surgery. J. P. O‘Leary and L. R. Capote. Williams & Wilkins, Louisiana
Reihsner R, Balogh B and Menzel EJ (1995). Two-dimensional elastic properties of human skin in terms of an incremental model at the in vivo configuration. Med Eng Phys 17(4): 304–313
Schneider DC, Davidson TM and Nahum AM (1984). In vitro biaxial stress–strain response of human skin. Arch Otolaryngol 110(5): 329–333
Snyder RW and Lee LH (1975). Experimental study of biological tissue subjected to pure shear. J Biomechanics 8(6): 415–419
Tong P and Fung YC (1976). The stress–strain relationship for the skin. J Biomechanics 9(10): 649–657
Zienkiewicz OC and Taylor RL (2000). The finite element method—solid mechanics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kvistedal, Y.A., Nielsen, P.M.F. Estimating material parameters of human skin in vivo. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 8, 1–8 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-007-0112-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-007-0112-z