Abstract
Purpose
We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Methods
We retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared early with delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis by systematically searching Medline and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 1966 and 2003. The outcomes of primary interest were mortality and morbidity.
Results
The ten trials we analyzed comprised 1 014 subjects; 534 were assigned to the early group and 480 assigned to the delayed group. The combined risk difference of mortality appeared to favor open cholecystectomy in the early period (risk difference, −0.02; 95% confidence interval, −0.44 to −0.00), but no differences were found among laparoscopic procedures or among all procedures. The combined risk difference of morbidity showed no differences between the open and laparoscopic procedures. The combined risk difference of the rate of conversion to open surgery showed no differences in the included laparoscopic studies; however, the combined total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group than in the delayed group.
Conclusions
There is no advantage to delaying cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis on the basis of outcomes in mortality, morbidity, rate of conversion to open surgery, and mean hospital stay. Thus, early cholecystectomy should be performed for patients with acute cholecystitis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BD Schirmer SB Edge J Dix MJ Hyser JB Hanks RS Jones (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis Ann Surg 213 665–76 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2cjovFE%3D Occurrence Handle1828141
A Cuschieri F Dubois J Mouiel P Mouret H Becker G Buess et al. (1991) ArticleTitleThe European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 385–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-B Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2MfgvFU%3D Occurrence Handle1825763
RC Frazee JW Roberts R Symmonds SK Snyder J Hendricks R Smith et al. (1992) ArticleTitleWhat are the contraindications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 164 491–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD2s3msVM%3D Occurrence Handle1443375
T Kiviluoto J Siren P Luukkonen E Kivilaakso (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis Lancet 351 321–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08447-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czhsVOhsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9652612
CF Chandler JS Lane P Ferguson JE Thompson SW Ashley (2000) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis Am Surg 66 896–900 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktlGgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10993625
CM Lo CL Liu ST Fan EC Lai J Wong (1998) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 227 461–7 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3it12qsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9563529
PB Lai KH Kwong KL Leung SP Kwok AC Chan SC Chung et al. (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 85 764–7 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czjtVaktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9667702
S Norrby P Herlin T Holmin R Sjodahl C Tagesson (1983) ArticleTitleEarly or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial Br J Surg 70 163–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyC2MvkvFE%3D Occurrence Handle6338991
HJ Jarvinen J Hastbacka (1980) ArticleTitleEarly cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study Ann Surg 191 501–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BC2svhtlM%3D Occurrence Handle6445180
Schaefer D, Barth H, Thon K, Jostarndt L, Maroske D. Early or delayed operation in patients with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Chir Forum Exp Klin Forsch 1980:149–53
J Lahtinen E Alhava S Aukee (1978) ArticleTitleAcute cholecystitis treated by early and delayed surgery. A controlled clinical trial Scand J Gastroenterol 13 673–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSaD3MvgvFw%3D Occurrence Handle358366
M Johansson A Thune A Blomqvist L Nelvin L Lundell (2003) ArticleTitleManagement of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial J Gastrointest Surg 7 642–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00065-9 Occurrence Handle12850677
P McArthur A Cuschieri RA Sells R Shields (1975) ArticleTitleControlled clinical trial comparing early with interval cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 62 850–2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSmD28zisVI%3D Occurrence Handle1104043
W der Linden H Sunzel (1970) ArticleTitleEarly versus delayed operation for acute cholecystitis. A controlled clinical trial Am J Surg 120 7–13 Occurrence Handle5426869
AK Madan S Aliabadi-Wahle D Tesi LM Flint SM Steinberg (2002) ArticleTitleHow early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis? Am J Surg 183 232–6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00789-4 Occurrence Handle11943117
TH Liu ET Consorti DW Mercer (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: technical considerations and outcome Semin Laparosc Surg 9 24–31 Occurrence Handle10.1053/slas.2002.32097 Occurrence Handle11979407
AR Jadad RA Moore D Carroll C Jenkinson DJ Reynolds DJ Gavaghan et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAssessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17 1–12 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3cfksFw%3D Occurrence Handle8721797
RJ Light DB Pilemer (1984) Summing up: the science of reviewing research Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
CB Begg M Mazumdar (1994) ArticleTitleOperating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias Biometrics 50 1088–101 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3cnlvVM%3D Occurrence Handle7786990
M Egger G Davey Smith M Schneider C Minder (1997) ArticleTitleBias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 315 629–34 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2MnmtVI%3D Occurrence Handle9310563
S Greenland JM Robins (1985) ArticleTitleEstimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data Biometrics 41 55–68 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB38nntlM%3D Occurrence Handle4005387
JL Fleiss (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions Wiley New York
R DerSimonian N Laird (1986) ArticleTitleMeta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 177–88 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC3cvisFI%3D Occurrence Handle3802833
Stata/SE 8.1 for Windows 2003 State TX, USA
DW Rattner C Ferguson AL Warshaw (1993) ArticleTitleFactors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 217 233–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1Mbjs1U%3D Occurrence Handle8452401
JA Singer RV McKeen (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or gangrenous cholecystitis Am Surg 60 326–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB3MzjsF0%3D Occurrence Handle8161080
F Chikamori N Kuniyoshi S Shibuya Y Takase (2002) ArticleTitleEarly scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis Surg Endosc 16 1704–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-9004-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jis1Citg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12209324
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shikata, S., Noguchi, Y. & Fukui, T. Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Surg Today 35, 553–560 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-2998-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-2998-3