Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: Support Care Cancer
DOI 10.1007/s00520-014-2217-0
The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes. The first sentence of the last paragraph in the results section incorrectly reads as:
“The regulation of distress explained 20.2 %, and benefit finding explained 69.2 % of the variance in the frequency of posttraumatic growth.”
Where it should have read as:
“The regulation of distress explained 5.2 %, and benefit finding explained 61.9 % of the variance in the frequency of posttraumatic growth.”
Also, the last sentence in the first paragraph in the discussion section incorrectly reads as:
“The regression analysis showed that benefit finding, regulation of distress, and comprehensibility were statistically significant in explaining the variance of PTG frequency.”
Where it should have read as:
“The regression analysis showed that benefit finding, and regulation of distress were statistically significant in explaining the variance of PTG frequency.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2217-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baník, G., Gajdošová, B. Erratum to: Positive changes following cancer: posttraumatic growth in the context of other factors in patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 22, 2031 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2313-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2313-1