Erratum to: Support Care Cancer

DOI 10.1007/s00520-014-2217-0

The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes. The first sentence of the last paragraph in the results section incorrectly reads as:

“The regulation of distress explained 20.2 %, and benefit finding explained 69.2 % of the variance in the frequency of posttraumatic growth.”

Where it should have read as:

“The regulation of distress explained 5.2 %, and benefit finding explained 61.9 % of the variance in the frequency of posttraumatic growth.”

Also, the last sentence in the first paragraph in the discussion section incorrectly reads as:

“The regression analysis showed that benefit finding, regulation of distress, and comprehensibility were statistically significant in explaining the variance of PTG frequency.”

Where it should have read as:

“The regression analysis showed that benefit finding, and regulation of distress were statistically significant in explaining the variance of PTG frequency.”