Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the viability of using a single test in which cardiorespiratory variables are measured, to establish training guidelines in running and/or cycling training activities. Six triathletes (two females and four males), six runners (two females and four males) and six males cyclists, all with 5.5 years of serious training and still involved in racing, were tested on a treadmill and cycle ergometer. Cardiorespiratory variables [e.g., heart rate (HR), minute ventilation, carbon dioxide output (V˙CO2)] were calculated relative to fixed percentages of maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max; from 50 to 100%). The entire group of subjects had significantly (P < 0.05) higher values of V˙O2max on the treadmill compared with the cycle ergometer [mean (SEM) 4.7 (0.8) and 4.4 (0.9) l · min−1, respectively], and differences between tests averaged 10.5% for runners, 6.1% for triathletes and 2.8% for cyclists. A three-way analysis of variance using a 3 × 2 × 6 design (groups × tests × intensities) demonstrated that all factors yielded highly significant F-ratios (P < 0.05) for all variables between tests, even though differences in HR were only 4 beats · min−1. When HR was plotted against a fixed percentage of V˙O2max, a high correlation was found between tests. These results demonstrate that for triathletes, cyclists and runners, the relationship between HR and percentage of V˙O2max, obtained in either a treadmill or a cycle ergometer test, may be used independently of absolute V˙O2max to obtain reference HR values that can be used to monitor their running and/or cycling training bouts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 3 November 1998 / Accepted: 29 July 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basset, F., Boulay, M. Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners and cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 81, 214–221 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050033
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050033