Abstract.
Background and purpose:
The benefit of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic high-grade stenosis has long been proven. The role of angioplasty as an alternative is still a matter of debate. We compared the occurrence of intraprocedural microembolic signals and ischemic lesions between carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty with stent placement (CAS) without a protection device.
Methods:
88 patients who underwent a CEA and 41 patients who underwent CAS were prospectively investigated. One day before and after the intervention diffusion weighted MRI-studies were obtained. In 21 CEA and 18 CAS patients transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring was performed during the procedure to detect microembolic signals (MES).
Results:
DWI-lesions could be detected after intervention in 17% of the CEA patients compared with 54% of the CAS patients (p<0.005). The median lesion volume was 0.08cm3 in the CEA group and 0.02cm3 in the CAS group (p<0.001). Ischemic complications consisted of 2 strokes (2.3%) with symptoms lasting more than seven days in the CEA group and 1 stroke (2.4 %) in the CAS group. The median number of MES in the CEA group was 17 versus 61 in the CAS group (p<0.001). No significant correlation was found between the total number of MES and ischemic lesions in either group.
Conclusion:
A larger number of emboligenic particles with smaller volume is detached during CAS. Additionally DWI lesions were observed in different territories after CAS but not after CEA. Conventional TCD emboli detection is not useful to compare interventional therapies of the carotid arteries.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
(1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 325:445–453
(2001) Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 357:1729–1737
(1998) Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 351:1379–1387
Ackerstaff RG, Moons KG, van de Vlasakker CJ, Moll FL, Vermeulen FE, Algra A, Spencer MP (2000) Association of intraoperative transcranial doppler monitoring variables with stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 31:1817–1823
Crawley F, Clifton A, Buckenham T, Loosemore T, Taylor RS, Brown MM (1997) Comparison of hemodynamic cerebral ischemia and microembolic signals detected during carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty. Stroke 28:2460–2464
Crawley F, Stygall J, Lunn S, Harrison M, Brown MM, Newman S (2000) Comparison of microembolism detected by transcranial Doppler and neuropsychological sequelae of carotid surgery and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Stroke 31:1329–1334
Gaunt ME (1998) Transcranial Doppler: preventing stroke during carotid endarterectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:377–387
Gaunt ME, Martin PJ, Smith JL, Rimmer T, Cherryman G, Ratliff DA, Bell PR, Naylor AR (1994) Clinical relevance of intraoperative embolization detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography during carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study of 100 patients. Br J Surg 81:1435–1439
Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI, Carroll BA, Eliasziw M, Gocke J, Hertzberg BS, Katanick S, Needleman L, Pellerito J, Polak JF, Rholl KS, Wooster DL, Zierler E (2003) Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology
Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD, Hauth E, Drescher R, Gissler HM, Hennigs S, Christmann A (2002) Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusionweighted MR imaging after stent implantation in the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:200–207
Jordan WD, Jr., Voellinger DC, Doblar DD, Plyushcheva NP, Fisher WS, Mc-Dowell HA (1999) Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovasc Surg 7:33–38
Lovblad KO, Pluschke W, Remonda L, Gruber-Wiest D, Do DD, Barth A, Kniemeyer HW, Bassetti C, Mattle HP, Schroth G (2000) Diffusion-weighted MRI for monitoring neurovascular interventions. Neuroradiology 42:134–138
Mathias K, Jager H, Sahl H, Hennigs S, Gissler HM (1999) Interventional treatment of arteriosclerotic carotid stenosis. Radiologe 39:125–134
Muller M, Reiche W, Langenscheidt P, Hassfeld J, Hagen T (2000) Ischemia after carotid endarterectomy: comparison between transcranial Doppler sonography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:47–54
Orlandi G, Fanucchi S, Fioretti C, Acerbi G, Puglioli M, Padolecchia R, Sartucci F, Murri L (2001) Characteristics of cerebral microembolism during carotid stenting and angioplasty alone. Arch Neurol 58:1410–1413
Ringelstein EB, Droste DW, Babikian VL, Evans DH, Grosset DG, Kaps M, Markus HS, Russell D, Siebler M (1998) Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD. International Consensus Group on Microembolus Detection. Stroke 29:725–729
Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR, Warlow CP, Barnett HJ (2003) Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116
Spencer MP (1997) Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 28:685–691
van Heesewijk HP, Vos JA, Louwerse ES, Van Den Berg JC, vertoom TT, Ernst SM, Mauser HW, Moll FL, Ackerstaff RG (2002) New brain lesions at MR imaging after carotid angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 224:361–365
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poppert, H., Wolf, O., Resch, M. et al. Differences in number, size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis. J Neurol 251, 1198–1203 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0502-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0502-4