Abstract
Objectives
The ablation of common type atrial flutter is mainly performed by two approved techniques, whose efficacy and outcome in terms of quality of life have not been evaluated so far in a long-term follow-up study over years. A high proportion of patients suffer from coexistent atrial fibrillation, which may worsen the ablation result. The question arises whether one technique is more effective than the other when immediate ablation results, the occurrence of atrial fibrillation and the quality of life are compared. Considering these facts, it is reasonable to think about new ablation strategies for common type atrial flutter in the era of new concepts in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Methods
In a retrospective study we evaluated a detailed questionnaire in 132 patients who underwent ablation of common type between 1999 and 2004. Radiofrequency ablation was performed irrespective of coexistent atrial fibrillation either with an irrigated tip or the 8 mm tip electrode. Acute and long-term ablation outcome, and the associated quality of life, pre-, under- and post-ablation was compared in the two different ablation groups. Recurrent tachycardia were re-evaluated by 12 lead ECG analysis and assessed for both ablation groups.
Results
88 (67%) of the 132 patients contacted answered the questionnaire polling the perceived benefits of the procedure. Of the other 44 patients (33%); 4 (3%) had died, 7 (5.3%) had moved, 33 patients (25%) could not be included due to missing or incoherent answers. Independent of the ablation technique there was a high acute and long-term ablation success rate at about 95%. After a mean of 3 years of follow-up this benefit persists in spite of a high proportion of recurrent tachycardia, mainly atrial fibrillation (55/88 patients, 59.1%). Despite the occurrence of secondary tachycardia, there was a high significant long-term symptomatic benefit in the state of healthy and daily practice work, evaluated with a p-value of < 0.0005. The frequency of episodes and the symptom "tachycardia" were significantly reduced after effective ablation of common type atrial flutter, p-values of 0.003 and 0.002, respectively.
Therefore the need for hospitalization was significant reduced (p = 0.001). Comparison of both approaches revealed that there was no significant difference related to the incidence and occurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Conclusions
The two mainly accepted and applied techniques for the ablation of common type atrial flutter show an excellent outcome under the aspect of ablation efficacy and quality of life in longterm follow-up. Three years after the ablation procedure the majority of patients consider the intervention beneficial. Despite the relatively high appearance of atrial fibrillation in the long-term follow-up this effect is still traceable.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anne W, Willems R, Adriaenssens B et al (2006) Long-term symptomatic benefit after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial flutter despite a high incidence of post-procedural atrial fibrillation. Acta Cardiol 61(I):75–82
Anselme F, Saoudi N, Poty H et al (1999) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter. Significance of palpitations and quality-oflife evaluation in patients with proven isthmus block. Circulation 99:534– 540
Bernhardt P, Schmidt H, Sommer T et al (2006) Atrial fibrillation – Patients at high risk for cerebral embolism. Clin Res Cardiol 95:148–153
Bertaglia F, Zoppo F, Bonso A et al (2004) Long term follow up of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter: clinical course and predictors of atrial fibrillation occurrence. Heart 90:59–63
Bielik H, Schrickel J, Shlevkov N et al (2005) Pharmacological and ablative hybrid therapy of atrial fibrillation. Long term effect on quality of life and arrhythmia-related symptoms. Z Kardiol 94:564–569
Calkins H, Canby R, Weiss R et al (2004) Results of catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 94:437–442
Da Costa A, Romeyer C, Mourot S et al (2002) Factors associated with early fibrillation after ablation of common atrial flutter. A single center prospective study. Eur Heart J 23:498–506
Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH et al (2000) Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:2242–2246
Katritsis D, Iliodromitis E, Fragakis N et al (1996) Ablation therapy of type I atrial flutter may eradicate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 78:345–347
Kettering K, Greil G, Busch M et al (2006) Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Ongoing atial fibrillation inside a single pulmonary vein after successful electrical disconnection and restoration of sinus rhythm in both atria. Clin Res Cardiol 95:663–667
Kleemann T, Becker T, Dönges K et al (2007) The prognostic impact of successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with organic heart disease. Clin Res Cardiol 96:103–108
Lee SH, Tai CT, Yu WH et al (1999) Effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation on quality of life in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 84:278–283
Movsowitz C, Callans DJ, Schartzmann D et al (1996) The results of atrial flutter ablation in patients with and without a history of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 78:93–96
Natale A, Newby KH, Pisano E et al (2000) Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1898–1904
O'Callaghan PA, Meara M, Kongsgaard E et al (2001) Symptomatic improvement after radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter. Heart 86:167–171
Ricci RP, Russound M, Santini M (2006) Management of atrial fibrillation. What are the possibilities of early detection with home monitoring. Clin Res Cardiol 95:10–16
Strohmer B, Schernthanerund C, Pichler M (2006) Simultaneous angiographic imaging of ipsilateral pulmonary veins for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol 95:591–599
Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE et al (1998) Long term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter : risk prediction of recurrent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 9:115–121
Wazni O, Marrouche NF, Martin DO et al (2003) Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection and covotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnectionalone in patients with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 108:2479–2483
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meissner, A., Christ, M., Maagh, P. et al. Quality of life and occurrence of atrial fibrillation in long-term follow-up of common type atrial flutter ablation:. Clin Res Cardiol 96, 794–802 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-007-0559-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-007-0559-z