Abstract
Concentration and source rate of precursor vapors participating in particle formation and subsequent growth were investigated during the Pearl River Delta intensive campaign (PRD2004, October 2004) in southeastern China. Four new particle formation event days and a typical non-event day were selected for our analysis. Atmospheric sulphuric acid, the important precursor vapor in nucleation and growth, were simulated with a pseudo steady-state model based on the measurements of SO2, NO x , O3, CO, non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) and ambient particle number concentrations as well as modeled photolysis frequencies obtained from measurements. The maximum midday sulphuric acid concentrations vary from 4.53 × 107 to 2.17 × 108 molecules cm−3, the corresponding source rate via reaction of OH and SO2 range between 2.37 × 106 and 1.16 × 107 molecules cm−3 s−1. Nucleation mode growth rate was derived from size spectral evolution during the events to be 6.8-13.8 nm h−1. Based on the growth rate, concentration of the vapors participating in subsequent growth were estimated to vary from 1.32 × 108 to 2.80 × 108 molecules cm−3 with corresponding source rate between 7.26 × 106 and 1.64 × 107 molecules cm−3 s−1. Our results show the degree of pollution is larger in PRD. Sulphuric acid concentrations are fairly high and have a close correlation with new particle formation events. Budget analysis shows that sulphuric acid alone is not enough for required growth; other nonvolatile vapors are needed. However, sulphuric acid plays an important role in growth; the contribution of sulphuric acid to growth in PRD is 12.4%–65.2%.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ansmann, A., R. Engelmann, D. Althausen, U. Wandinger, M. Hu, Y. H. Zhang, and Q. S. He, 2005: High aerosol load over the Pearl River Delta, China, observed with Raman lidar and Sun photometer. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L13815, doi: 10.1029/2005GL023094.
Birmili, W., A. Nowak, K. Schwirn, K. Lehmann, A. Massling, and A. Wiedensohler, 2004: A new method to accurately relate dry and humidified number size distributions of atmospheric aerosols. Journal of Aerosol Science, Abstracts of EAC, Budapest, 1, 15–16.
Boy, M., and Coauthors, 2005: Sulphuric acid closure and contribution to nucleation mode particle growth. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5, 863–878.
Cheng, Y. F., and Coauthors, 2006: Mixing state of elemental carbon and non-light-absorbing aerosol components derived from in situ particle optical properties at Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China. J. Geophys. Res., 111, doi: 10.1029/2005JD006929.
Coffman, D. J., and D. A. Hegg, 1995: A preliminary study of the effect of ammonia on particle nucleation in the marine boundary layer. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 7147–7160.
Dal Maso, M., M. Kulmala, I. Riipinen, R. Wagner, T. Hussein, P. P. Aalto, and K. E. J. Lehtinen, 2005: Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiala, Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 10, 323–336.
DeMore, W. B., and Coauthors, 1997: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modeling. Evaluation No. 12, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication 97-4, 278pp.
Ehhalt, D. H., and F. Rohrer, 2000: Dependence of OH concentration on solar UV. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3565–3571.
Eisele, F. L., and D. J. Tanner, 1993: Measurement of the gas phase concentration of H2SO4 and methane sulfonic acid and estimates of H2SO4 production and loss in the atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 9001–9010.
Fuchs, N. A., and A. G. Sutugin, 1971: Highly dispersed aerosol. Topics in Current Aerosol Research, G. M. Hidy and J. R. Brock, Eds., Pergamon, New York, 1–60.
Gery, M. W., G. Z. Whitten, J. P. Killus, and M. C. Dodge, 1989: A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12925–12959.
Hämeri, K., and Coauthors, 2001: Hygroscopic and CCN properties of aerosol particles in boreal forests. Tellus, 53B, 359–379.
Harrington, D. Y., and S. M. Kreidenweis, 1998: Simulations of sulfate aerosol dynamics—I. Model description. Atmos. Environ., 32, 1691–1700.
Hussein, T., M. Dal Maso, T. Petäjä, I. K. Koponen, P. Paatero, P. P. Aalto, K. Hämeri, and M. Kulmala, 2005: Evaluation of an automatic algorithm for fitting the particle number size distributions. Boreal Environment Research, 10, 337–355.
Kerminen, V.-M., L. Pirjola, and M. Kulmala, 2001: How significantly does coagulational scavenging limit atmospheric particle production? J. Geophys. Res., 106, 24119–24125.
Kulmala, M., 2003: How particles nucleate and grow. Science, 307, 1000–1001.
Kulmala, M. and A. Laaksonen, 1990: Binary nucleation of water-sulfuric acid system: Comparison of classical theories with different H2SO4 saturation vapor pressures. Journal of Chemistry and Physics, 93, 696–701.
Kulmala, M., A. Toivonen, J. M. Mäkelä, and A. Laaksonen, 1998: Analysis of the growth of nucleation mode particles in boreal forest. Tellus, 50B, 449–462.
Kulmala, M., L. Pirjola, and J. M. Mäkelä, 2000: Stable sulphate clusters as a source of new atmospheric particles. Nature, 404, 66–69.
Kulmala, M., and Coauthors, 2001: On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles. Tellus, 53B, 479–490.
Kulmala, M., H. Vehkamäki, T. Petäjä, M. Dal Maso, A. Lauri, V.-M. Kerminen, W. Birmili, and P. H. Mc-Murry, 2004: Formation and growth rates of ultra-fine atmospheric particles: a review of observations. Journal of Aerosol Science, 35, 143–176.
Kulmala, M., T. Petäjä, P. Mönkkönen, I. K. Koponen, M. Dal Maso, P. P. Aalto, K. E. J. Lehtinen, and V.-M. Kerminen, 2005: On the growth of nucleation mode particles: source rates of condensable vapor in polluted and clean environments. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5, 409–416.
Mäkelä, J. M., M. Dal Maso, L. Pirjola, P. Keronen, L. Laakso, M. Kulmala, and A. Laaksonen, 2000: Characteristics of the atmospheric particle formation events observed at a boreal forest site in southern Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 5, 299–313.
McMurry, P. H., and Coauthors, 2005: A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D22S02, doi:10.1029/2005JD005901.
Menon, S., A. D. Del Genio, D. Koch, and G. Tselioudis, 2002: GCM simulations of the aerosol indirect effect: Sensitivity to cloud parameterization and aerosol burden. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 692–713.
Ramanathan, V., P. J. Crutzen, J. T. Kiehl, and D. Rosenfeld, 2001: Aerosol, climate, and the hydrological cycle. Science, 294, 2119–2124.
Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis, 1998: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1326pp.
Stanier, C., A. Y. Khlystov, and S. N. Pandis, 2004: Nucleation events during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Description and relation to key meteorological, gas phase, and aerosol parameters. Aerosol Science and Technology, 38(S1), 253–264.
Stieb, D. M., S. Judek, and R. T. Burnett, 2002: Metaanalysis of timeseries studies of air pollution and mortality: Effects of gases and particles and their influence of cause of death, age and season. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 52, 470–484.
Stolzenburg, M. R., P. H. McMurry, H. Sakurai, J. N. Smith, R. L. Mauldin III, F. L. Eisele, and C. F. Clement, 2005: Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D22S05, doi: 10.1029/2005JD005935.
Weber, R. J., P. H. McMurry, F. L. Eisele, and D. J. Tanner, 1995: Measurement of expected nucleation precursor species and 3-500-nm diameter particles at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2242–2257.
Weber, R. J., J. J. Marti, P. H. McMurry, F. L. Eisele, D. J. Tanner, and A. Jefferson, 1997: Measurements of new particle formation and ultrafine particle growth rates at a clean continental site. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 4375–4385.
Wehner, B., A. Wiedensohler, T. M. Tuch, Z. J. Wu, M. Hu, J. Slanina, and C. S. Kiang, 2004: Variability of the aerosol number size distribution in Beijing, China: New particle formation, dust storms, and high continental background. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L22108, doi: 10.1029/2004GL021596.
Wichmann, H.-H., and A. Peters, 2000: Epidemiological evidence of the effects of ultrafine particle exposure. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 358, 2751–2769.
Wu, Z. J., and Coauthors, 2007: New particle formation in Beijing, China: Statistical analysis of a 1-year data set. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09209, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007406.
Yu, F., and R. P. Turco, 2000: Ultrafine aerosol formation via ion-mediated nucleation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 883–886.
Zhang, R., I. Suh, J. Zhao, D. Zhang, E. C. Fortner, X. Tie, L. T. Molina, and M. J. Molina, 2004a: Atmospheric new particle formation enhanced by organic acids. Science, 304, 1487–1490.
Zhang, Y. H., X. L. Zhu, S. Slanina, M. Shao, L. M. Zeng, M. Hu, M. Bergin, and L. Salmon, 2004b: Aerosol pollution in some Chinese cities (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 76(6), 1227–1239.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, Y., Su, H., Cheng, Y. et al. Analysis on concentration and source rate of precursor vapors participating in particle formation and growth at xinken in the Pearl River Delta of China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 25, 427–436 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-008-0427-4
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-008-0427-4