Abstract
Three photoacoustic (PA) cells designed for trace-gas sensing were compared by measuring absorption by the P(15) rotational line of the \(\upsilon_{1}+\upsilon_{3}\) vibrational combination band of acetylene using a distributed-feedback diode laser. Normalised sensitivities were determined for each cell by analysis of the signal to noise ratios of acquired spectra. The first cell was constructed in-house, and contained a single electret microphone held in a stainless steel tube. The second cell was a differential PA cell that contained two microphones housed in identical flow tubes, with one microphone to detect the PA signal and the other to determine background noise levels. The third cell contained a novel cantilever pressure sensor, movement of which was measured by a compact laser interferometer. Normalised sensitivities (2σ) of 3.1×10-7, 1.7×10-7 and 2.2×10-9 cm-1 W Hz-1/2, respectively, were obtained. An erbium-doped fibre amplifier was used to amplify the laser power, and a detection limit of 9.8×1010 molecule cm-3 was obtained using the cantilever pressure sensor PA cell, with a laser power of 1.17 W. This detection limit corresponded to a mixing ratio of 14.5 parts per billion by volume at 277 mbar.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
W.R. Laing (ed.), Analytical Chemistry Instrumentation (Lewis, Chelsea, MI, USA, 1986)
K.C. Clemitshaw, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 1 (2004)
P.A. Martin, Chem. Soc. Rev. 31, 201 (2002)
M. Mazurenka, A.J. Orr-Ewing, R. Peverall, G.A.D. Ritchie, Ann. Rep. Prog. Chem. C 101, 100 (2005)
F.J.M. Harren, G. Cotti, J. Oomens, S. te Lintel Hekkert, Photoacoustic spectroscopy in trace gas monitoring, in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, ed. by R.A. Meyers (Wiley, Chichester, 2000), pp. 2203–2226
M.W. Sigrist, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 486 (2003) and references therein
A.G. Bell, Am. J. Sci. 20, 305 (1880)
L.B. Kreuzer, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 2934 (1971)
L.B. Kreuzer, N.D. Kenyon, C.K.N. Patel, Science 177, 347 (1972)
P.L. Meyer, M.W. Sigrist, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 1779 (1990)
A. Miklós, P. Hess, Z. Bozoki, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 1937 (2001)
A. Schmohl, A. Miklós, P. Hess, Appl. Opt. 41, 1815 (2002)
M.E. Webber, M. Pushkarsky, C.K.N. Patel, Appl. Opt. 42, 2119 (2003)
J.P. Besson, S. Schilt, L. Thevenaz, Proc. SPIE 5855, 415 (2005)
A. Schmohl, A. Miklós, P. Hess, Appl. Opt. 40, 2571 (2001)
J. Uotila, V. Koskinen, J. Kauppinen, Vib. Spectrosc. 38, 3 (2005)
A. Rossi, R. Buffa, M. Scotoni, D. Bassi, S. Iannotta, A. Boschetti, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 041110 (2005)
Z. Bozoki, J. Sneider, G. Szabo, A. Miklós, M. Serenyi, G. Nagy, M. Feher, Appl. Phys. B 63, 399 (1996)
A.A. Kosterev, Y.A. Bakhirkin, R.F. Curl, F.K. Tittel, Opt. Lett. 27, 1902 (2002)
M. Pedersen, J. McClelland, Proc. SPIE 5732, 108 (2005)
T. Laurila, H. Cattaneo, V. Koskinen, J. Kauppinen, R. Hernberg, Opt. Express 13, 2453 (2005)
P. Repond, M.W. Sigrist, Appl. Opt. 36, 4065 (1996)
The HITRAN database is available from www.hitran.com
T. Laurila, H. Cattaneo, T. Pöyhönen, V. Koskinen, J. Kauppinen, R. Hernberg, Appl. Phys. B 83, 285 (2006)
A. Miklós, personal communication (2005)
K. Wilcken, J. Kauppinen, Appl. Spectrosc. 57, 1087 (2003)
T. Laurila, H. Cattaneo, T. Pöyhönen, V. Koskinen, J. Kauppinen, R. Hernberg, Appl. Phys. B 83, 669 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
PACS
82.80.Kq; 42.62.Fi; 82.80.Gk
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindley, R., Parkes, A., Keen, K. et al. A sensitivity comparison of three photoacoustic cells containing a single microphone, a differential dual microphone or a cantilever pressure sensor. Appl. Phys. B 86, 707–713 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2543-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2543-0