Abstract
Electron beam melting (EBM) is emerged as a promising metal-based additive manufacturing technology. The technique allows the build of complex and fully dense metallic parts by using an electron beam to melt metallic powder layer by layer. This technique has been applied efficiently in aeronautic and automobile sectors, as well as biomedical engineering. However, the environmental performance of EBM is still an open question. This paper aims to offer a more comprehensive understanding on environmental impacts related to EBM process. A methodology based on life cycle assessment (LCA) method is proposed to evaluate environmental impacts related to EBM. In particular, the influence of different parameters, such as total build height, batch size (i.e., number of parts per build), and material waste due to support structures on the environmental performance of EBM is discussed. By comparing environmental impacts between (EBM + finishing machining) and conventional approach (i.e., machining) approaches, which are used to manufacture a same mechanical part, the environmentally friendly area of each manufacturing approach is also determined. The results show that the (EBM + finishing machining) approach becomes the best option on the environmental point of view when the total build height decreases and the batch size is close to a full build configuration. On the other hand, the amount of material waste due to support structures in EBM does not significantly influence on the environmental performance of the EBM process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer US, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9
Mandil G, Le VT, Paris H, Suard M (2016) Building new entities from existing titanium part by electron beam melting: microstructures and mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:1835–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8049-3
Chen L, He Y, Yang Y, Niu S, Ren H (2017) The research status and development trend of additive manufacturing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3651–3660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9335-4
Huang S, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5
Thompson MK, Moroni G, Vaneker T, Fadel G, Campbell RI, Gibson I, Bernard A, Schulz J, Graf P, Ahuja B, Martina F (2016) Design for Additive Manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:737–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004
Despeisse M, Yang M, Evans S, Ford S, Minshall T (2017) Sustainable value roadmapping framework for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 61:594–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.186
Le VT, Paris H, Mandil G (2017) Extracting features for manufacture of parts from existing components based on combining additive and subtractive technologies. Int J Interact Des Manuf 12:525–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0395-y
Le VT, Paris H, Mandil G (2017) Process planning for combined additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies in a remanufacturing context. J Manuf Syst 44:243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.06.003
Le VT, Paris H, Mandil G, Brissaud D (2017) A direct material reuse approach based on additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies for manufacture of parts from existing components. Procedia CIRP 61:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.190
Le VT, Paris H, Mandil G (2015) Using additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies in a new remanufacturing strategy to produce new parts from end-of-life parts. 22nd Conf French Mech (CFM2015), 24th–28th August, Lyon, France
Durão LFCS, Christ A, Zancul E, Anderl R, Schützer K (2017) Additive manufacturing scenarios for distributed production of spare parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0555-z
Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Clean Prod 137:1573–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150
Zhu Z, Dhokia V, Newman ST, Nassehi A (2014) Application of a hybrid process for high precision manufacture of difficult to machine prismatic parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6053-7
Kara S, Li W (2011) Unit process energy consumption models for material removal processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.018
Kellens K, Dewulf W, Overcash M, Hauschild MZ, Duflou JR (2012) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! Initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:242–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0352-0
Kellens K, Dewulf W, Overcash M, Hauschild MZ, Duflou JR (2012) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! Initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 2: case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:242–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0352-0
Gebler M, Schoot Uiterkamp AJM, Visser C (2014) A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy 74:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033
Le Bourhis F, Kerbrat O, Dembinski L, Hascoet J-Y, Mognol P (2014) Predictive model for environmental assessment in additive manufacturing process. Procedia CIRP 15:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.031
Kellens K, Renaldi R, Dewulf W, Kruth J, Duflou JR (2014) Environmental impact modeling of selective laser sintering processes. Rapid Prototyp J 20:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0018
Faludi J, Baumers M, Maskery I, Hague R (2016) Environmental impacts of selective laser melting: do printer, powder, or power dominate? J Ind Ecol 0:S144–S156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12528
Kellens K, Mertens R, Paraskevas D, Dewulf W, Duflou JR (2017) Environmental impact of additive manufacturing processes: does AM contribute to a more sustainable way of part manufacturing? Procedia CIRP 61:582–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.153
Morrow WR, Qi H, Kim I, Mazumder J, Skerlos SJ (2007) Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. J Clean Prod 15:932–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.030
Serres N, Tidu D, Sankare S, Hlawka F (2011) Environmental comparison of MESO-CLAD process and conventional machining implementing life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 19:1117–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.010
Tang Y, Mak K, Zhao YF (2016) A framework to reduce product environmental impact through design optimization for additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 137:1560–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.037
Peng S, Li T, Wang X, Dong M, Liu Z, Shi J et al (2017) Toward a sustainable impeller production: environmental impact comparison of different impeller manufacturing methods. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12628
Paris H, Mokhtarian H, Coatanéa E, Museau M, Ituarte IF (2016) Comparative environmental impacts of additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.036
Priarone PC, Ingarao G, di Lorenzo R, Settineri L (2016) Influence of material-related aspects of additive and subtractive Ti-6Al-4V manufacturing on energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions. J Ind Ecol 0:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12523
Huang R, Riddle M, Graziano D, Warren J, Das S, Nimbalkar S, Cresko J, Masanet E (2016) Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: the case of lightweight aircraft components. J Clean Prod 135:1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.109
Baumers M, Tuck C, Hague R, Ashcroft I, Wildman R (2010) A comparative study of metallic additive manufacturing power consumption, 21st Int Solid Free Fabr Symp: 278–88
Baumers M, Tuck C, Wildman R, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2016) Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing? J Ind Ecol 0:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12397
Durand F (2005) The electromagnetic cold crucible as a tool for melt preparation and continuous casting. Int J Cast Met Res 18:93–107. https://doi.org/10.1179/136404605225022883
Yolton CF, Froes FH (2015) Conventional titanium powder production. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800054-0.00002-2
Béraud N, Vignat F, Villeneuve F, Dendievel R (2017) Improving dimensional accuracy in EBM using beam characterization and trajectory optimization. Addit Manuf 14:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.002
Le VT, Paris H, Mandil G (2017) Environmental impact assessment of an innovative strategy based on an additive and subtractive manufacturing combination. J Clean Prod 164:508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.204
Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region of France for its support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Le, V.T., Paris, H. A life cycle assessment-based approach for evaluating the influence of total build height and batch size on the environmental performance of electron beam melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 275–288 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2264-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2264-7