Abstract
The information loss paradox is usually stated as an incompatibility between general relativity and quantum mechanics. However, the assumptions leading to the problem are often overlooked and, in fact, a careful inspection of the main hypothesises suggests a radical reformulation of the problem. Indeed, we present a thought experiment involving a black hole that emits radiation and, independently of the nature of the radiation, we show the existence of an incompatibility between (i) the validity of the laws of general relativity to describe infalling matter far from the Planckian regime, and (ii) the so-called central dogma which states that as seen from an outside observer a black hole behaves like a quantum system whose number of degrees of freedom is proportional to the horizon area. We critically revise the standard arguments in support of the central dogma, and argue that they cannot hold true unless some new physics is invoked even before reaching Planck scales. This suggests that the information loss problem, in its current formulation, is not necessarily related to any loss of information or lack of unitarity. Therefore, in principle, semiclassical general relativity and quantum mechanics can be perfectly compatible before reaching the final stage of the black hole evaporation where, instead, a consistent theory of quantum gravity is needed to make any prediction.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [arXiv:1602.03837] [INSPIRE].
R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (1965) 57 [INSPIRE].
S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206] [INSPIRE].
S. W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460 [INSPIRE].
S. D. Mathur, The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001 [arXiv:0909.1038] [INSPIRE].
W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Information loss, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 (2017) 092002 [arXiv:1703.02140] [INSPIRE].
D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE].
D. N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083] [INSPIRE].
D. N. Page, Black hole information, hep-th/9305040 [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, The entropy of Hawking radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021) 035002 [arXiv:2006.06872] [INSPIRE].
G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox, JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [arXiv:1905.08255] [INSPIRE].
G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, arXiv:1911.11977 [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1908.10996] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation, JHEP 05 (2020) 013 [arXiv:1911.12333] [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Observations of Hawking radiation: the Page curve and baby universes, JHEP 04 (2021) 272 [arXiv:2010.06602] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Island finder and entropy bound, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 106005 [arXiv:2101.11648] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].
R. M. Wald, General relativity, Chicago University Prress, Chicago U.S.A. (1984).
J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4 (1972) 737 [INSPIRE].
J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, Non-thermal corrections to Hawking radiation versus the information paradox, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1509.04645] [INSPIRE].
C. Barcelo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Analogue gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 8 (2005) 12 [gr-qc/0505065] [INSPIRE].
J. Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nature Phys. 12 (2016) 959 [arXiv:1510.00621] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinfurtner, Quantum simulation of black-hole radiation, Nature 569 (2019) 634 [INSPIRE].
S. Liberati, G. Tricella and A. Trombettoni, The information loss problem: an analogue gravity perspective, Entropy 21 (2019) 940 [arXiv:1908.01036] [INSPIRE].
J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 161 [INSPIRE].
J. D. Bekenstein, A universal upper bound on the entropy to energy ratio for bounded systems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 287 [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, A covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9905177] [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, Conf. Proc. C 930308 (1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, The world as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, The holographic principle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 825 [hep-th/0203101] [INSPIRE].
A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE].
J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
D. A. Lowe, Comments on a covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 10 (1999) 026 [hep-th/9907062] [INSPIRE].
V. Coffman, J. Kundu and W. K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 052306 [quant-ph/9907047] [INSPIRE].
C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1895 [INSPIRE].
S. Mukohyama, Comments on entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 104023 [gr-qc/9805039] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE].
J. A. Wheeler, Geometrodynamics and the issue of final state, in Les Houches Summer Shcool of Theoretical Physics: Relativity, Groups and Topology, C. De Witt and B. DeWitt eds., Gordon and Breach, U.S.A. (1964).
H. Casini, Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 205021 [arXiv:0804.2182] [INSPIRE].
E. T. Tomboulis, Renormalization and unitarity in higher derivative and nonlocal gravity theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30 (2015) 1540005 [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi, On the quantum field theory of the gravitational interactions, JHEP 06 (2017) 086 [arXiv:1704.07728] [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi and M. Piva, The ultraviolet behavior of quantum gravity, JHEP 05 (2018) 027 [arXiv:1803.07777] [INSPIRE].
J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, Gauge assisted quadratic gravity: a framework for UV complete quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 126005 [arXiv:1804.04980] [INSPIRE].
A. Salvio, Quadratic gravity, Front. in Phys. 6 (2018) 77 [arXiv:1804.09944] [INSPIRE].
B. Holdom, Ultra-Planckian scattering from a QFT for gravity, arXiv:2107.01727 [INSPIRE].
R. Percacci, An introduction to covariant quantum gravity and asymptotic safety, in 100 years of general relativity, volume 3, World Scientific, Singapore (2017) [INSPIRE].
M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum gravity and the functional renormalization group: the road towards asymptotic safety, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2019).
A. B. Platania, Asymptotically Safe Gravity, Springer Theses, Springer, Germany (2018) [INSPIRE].
A. Bonanno et al., Critical reflections on asymptotically safe gravity, Front. in Phys. 8 (2020) 269 [arXiv:2004.06810] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow and E. Shaghoulian, Global symmetry, Euclidean gravity, and the black hole information problem, JHEP 04 (2021) 175 [arXiv:2010.10539] [INSPIRE].
H. Geng et al., Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity, arXiv:2107.03390 [INSPIRE].
H. Omiya and Z. Wei, Causal structures and nonlocality in double holography, arXiv:2107.01219 [INSPIRE].
G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752 [INSPIRE].
V. P. Frolov and I. Novikov, Dynamical origin of the entropy of a black hole, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4545 [gr-qc/9309001] [INSPIRE].
A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029] [INSPIRE].
G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6189 [hep-th/9612146] [INSPIRE].
A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi and K. Krasnov, Quantum geometry and black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 904 [gr-qc/9710007] [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, Black hole entropy from loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3288 [gr-qc/9603063] [INSPIRE].
K. A. Meissner, Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 5245 [gr-qc/0407052] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black hole’s quantum N-portrait, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 742 [arXiv:1112.3359] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black holes as critical point of quantum phase transition, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2752 [arXiv:1207.4059] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Quantum compositeness of gravity: black holes, AdS and inflation, JCAP 01 (2014) 023 [arXiv:1312.4795] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, C. Gomez, R. S. Isermann, D. Lüst and S. Stieberger, Black hole formation and classicalization in ultra-Planckian 2 → N scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 893 (2015) 187 [arXiv:1409.7405] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306069] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, Gedanken experiments involving black holes, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 966 [hep-th/9308100] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, Thermality of the Hawking flux, JHEP 07 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1409.7754] [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, The scattering matrix approach for the quantum black hole: An Overview, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11 (1996) 4623 [gr-qc/9607022] [INSPIRE].
P. Betzios, N. Gaddam and O. Papadoulaki, The black hole S-matrix from quantum mechanics, JHEP 11 (2016) 131 [arXiv:1607.07885] [INSPIRE].
N. Gaddam and N. Groenenboom, Soft graviton exchange and the information paradox, arXiv:2012.02355 [INSPIRE].
S. D. Mathur, The fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review, Fortsch. Phys. 53 (2005) 793 [hep-th/0502050] [INSPIRE].
S. A. Hayward, The disinformation problem for black holes (pop version), gr-qc/0504038 [INSPIRE].
S. B. Giddings, Nonviolent nonlocality, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064023 [arXiv:1211.7070] [INSPIRE].
S. W. Hawking, Information preservation and weather forecasting for black holes, arXiv:1401.5761 [INSPIRE].
S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, Soft hair on black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 231301 [arXiv:1601.00921] [INSPIRE].
V. P. Frolov, Information loss problem and a ‘black hole‘ model with a closed apparent horizon, JHEP 05 (2014) 049 [arXiv:1402.5446] [INSPIRE].
V. P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov, Quantum radiation from an evaporating nonsingular black hole, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 124028 [arXiv:1704.03043] [INSPIRE].
J. M. Bardeen, Black hole evaporation without an event horizon, arXiv:1406.4098 [INSPIRE].
F. D’Ambrosio, M. Christodoulou, P. Martin-Dussaud, C. Rovelli and F. Soltani, End of a black hole’s evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 106014 [arXiv:2009.05016] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2107.05662
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Buoninfante, L., Di Filippo, F. & Mukohyama, S. On the assumptions leading to the information loss paradox. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)081
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)081