Abstract
During their participation in a classroom-based research project, 9-10-year-old students had opportunities to develop their visual meaning-making skills and competences, as well as their aesthetic understanding of and critical thinking about multimodal ensembles. The Grade 4 students read, discussed and wrote about picturebooks during Language Arts, Social Studies and Science, and participated in a range of activities that focused on a selection of elements of visual art and design. For the culminating activity of an interdisciplinary Social Studies unit, which was one component of the case study research, the students designed a multimodal poster to communicate their learning about how interactions between Indigenous Peoples and European explorers lead to change. Photographs of four students’ Exploration posters and excerpts from their written poster descriptions reveal how the students purposefully selected and orchestrated specific semiotic resources of image and layout to represent and express meanings that realized their objectives as sign-makers in a particular context. Indeed, the students designed multifaceted symbolic images that communicated their historical understandings as well as their knowledge about the elements of visual art and design under study. Discussion of the students’ Exploration posters is situated in sociocultural and social semiotics theory, multimodality, and visual competences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2016). Children reading pictures: Interpreting visual texts (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
Brugar, K. A. (2017). ‘We don’t have students colour maps anymore’... A survey of social studies teachers use of visual materials. Journal of Visual Literacy, 36(3–4), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2017.1397380
Brugar, K. A., & Roberts, K. L. (2017). Seeing is believing. Promoting visual literacy in elementary social studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117696280
Callow, J. (2013). The shape of text to come: How image and text work. Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
Dalton, B. (2014/2015). Level up with multimodal compositions in social studies. The Reading Teacher, 68(4), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1319
Dalton et al., (2015). Fifth-grade students’ digital retellings and the Common Core: Modaluse and design intentionality. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1086/681969
Demoiny, S. B., & Ferraras-Stone, J. (2018). Critical literacy in elementary social studies: Juxtaposing historical master and counter narratives in picture books. The Social Studies, 109(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2018.1451981
Guralnik, D. (Ed.). (1976). Webster’s new world dictionary of the American language (2nd ed.). William Collins and World Publishing.
Harrington, J. M. (2016). ‘We’re all kids!’: Picture books and cultural awareness. The Social Studies, 107(6), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2016.1214906
Indigenous Corporate Training Inc. (2018). Indigenous Peoples: A guide to terminology, https://www.ictinc.ca/indigenous-peoples-a-guide-to-terminology
Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality, literacy and school English. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 342–353). Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G. (2015). Semiotic work: Applied linguistics and a social semiotic account of multimodality. AIR A Review, 28(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.03kre
Leland, C. H., & Bruzas, S. R. (2014). Becoming text analysts: Unpacking purpose and perspective. Language Arts, 92(1), 23–35.
Lintner, T. (2010). Using children’s literature to promote critical geographical awareness in elementary classrooms. The Social Studies, 101(1), 17–21.
Macken-Horarik, M. (2016). Building a metalanguage for interpreting multimodal literature: Insights from systemic functional semiotics in two case study classrooms. English in Australia, 52(2), 85–99.
Marsden, J., & Tan, S. (1998). The rabbits. Lothian Children’s Books
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
Muller, M. G. (2008). Visual competence: A new paradigm for studying visuals in the social sciences? Visual Studies, 23(2), 101–112.
Pantaleo, S. (2012a). Exploring grade 7 students’ responses to Shaun Tan’s The red tree. Children’s Literature in Education, 43(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-011-9156-x
Pantaleo, S. (2012b). Meaning-making with colour in multimodal texts: One 11-year-old student’s purposeful ‘doing.’ Literacy, 46(3), 147–155.
Pantaleo, S. (2014). Elementary students consider the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of typography in picturebooks. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 20(2), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2014.929450
Pantaleo, S. (2016). Primary students’ understanding and appreciation of the artwork in picturebooks. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(2), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415569816
Pantaleo, S. (2017). Critical thinking and young children’s exploration of picturebook artwork. Language and Education, 32(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1242599
Pantaleo, S. (2018). Elementary students’ analytical responses about David Wiesner’s The Three Pigs. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 24(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2018.1533616
Pantaleo, S. (2020a). Slow looking: ‘Reading picturebooks takes time.’ Literacy, 54(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12190
Pantaleo, S. (2020b). Student meaning-making of the artwork in a science trade book: An interdisciplinary opportunity for developing visual literacy. Literacy Research and Instruction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1854906
Pantaleo, S. (2021). Student meaning-making of an allegorical picturebook in social studies. The Social Studies. Advanced online publication. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/10.1080/00377996.2021.1896464
Papademetriou, E., & Makri, D. (2015). The metalanguage of ‘visual design’ into the classroom for the construction of intermodal meanings. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 3(2), 32–43.
Pellegrino, A. M., Zenkov, K., & Calamito, N. (2013). ’Pay attention and take some notes’: Middle school youth, multimodal instruction, and notions of citizenship. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 37, 221–238.
Roberts, K. L., & Brugar, K. A. (2017). The view from here: Emergence of graphical literacy. Reading Psychology, 38(8), 733–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1336661
Samara, T. (2007). Design elements: A graphic style manual. Rockport Publishers.
Silseth, K., & Gilje, O. (2019). Multimodal composition and assessment: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297292
Sipe, L. R. (2008). Storytime: Young children’s literary understanding in the classroom. Teachers College Press.
Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 247–257.
Tan, S. (2001). Originality and creativity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Australian Literacy Educators’ Association, July 12–15, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Tishman, S. (2018). Slow looking: The art and practice of learning through observation. Routledge.
Unsworth, L., & Macken-Horarik, M. (2015). Interpretive responses to images in picture books by primary and secondary students: Exploring curriculum expectations of a ’visual grammatics’. English in Education, 49(1), 56–79.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
White, A. W. (2011). The elements of graphic design. Allworth Press.
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152.
Youngs, S. (2012). Understanding history through the visual images in historical fiction. Language Arts, 89(6), 379–391.
Zammit, K. (2015). Extending students’ semiotic understandings: Learning about and creating multimodal texts. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1291–1308). Springer Science+Business Media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pantaleo, S. The multimodal meaning-making of elementary students in social studies. AJLL 44, 35–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652079
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652079