Abstract
The present research examined stimulus generalization and gradient shifts on a dimension involving human faces. Twenty undergraduates were instructed to examine the proportion of the total face length that lay between the tip of the nose and the end of the chin. The face stimuli were images of actual people shown on a computer screen; no face was shown more than once. All of the participants received discrimination training. The positive stimuli were faces with average proportions (ratios of 0.356 to 0.365). The negative stimuli were faces with very small proportions (ratios less than or equal to 0.315) for half of the participants, and faces with very large proportions (ratios greater than or equal to 0.405), for the other half. The generalization test consisted of images from 5 categories of proportions, ranging from very small to very large. The results of both conditions included a shift in the gradient away from the negative stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CHENG, K. (2002). Generalisation: Mechanistic and functional explanations. Animal Cognition, 5, 33–40.
GALIZIO, M. (1985). Human peak shift: Analysis of the effects of three-stimulus discrimination training. Learning and Motivation, 16, 478–494.
GHIRLANDA, S., & ENQUIST, M. (1999). The geometry of stimulus control. Animal Behaviour, 58, 695–706.
GHIRLANDA, S., & ENQUIST, M. (2003). A century of generalization. Animal Behaviour, 66, 15–36.
HANSON, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 321–334.
HANSON, H. M. (1961). Stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 54, 181–185.
HONIG, W. K., & URCUIOLL, P. J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 405–445.
LEWIS, M. B., & JOHNSTON, R. A. (1999). Are caricatures special? Evidence of peak shift in face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 105–117.
MAZUR, J. E. (2002). Learning and behavior (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
MCLAREN, I. P. L., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (2002). Associative learning and elemental representation II: Generalization and discrimination. Animal Learning and Behavior, 30, 177–200.
POKRZYWINSKI, J. (1970). Presence-absence discrimination training on a line-length dimension. The Psychological Record, 20, 211–217.
RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & HIRSTEIN, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 15–51.
RILLING, M. (1977). Stimulus control and inhibitory processes. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 432–480). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
SPETCH, M. L., & CHENG, K. (1998). A step function in pigeons’ temporal generalization in the peak shift task. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 103–118.
SPETCH, M. L., CHENG, K., & CLIFFORD, C. W. G. (2004). Peak shift but not range effects in recognition of faces. Learning and Motivation, 35, 221–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Derenne, A., Breitstein, R.M. Gradient Shifts with Naturally Occurring Human Face Stimuli. Psychol Rec 56, 365–370 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395555
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395555