Abstract
Prior studies have shown that the establishment of equivalence classes using the simple-to-complex protocol significantly enhanced the emergence of other new equivalence classes under the simultaneous protocol (yield). The current experiment showed how those enhancement effects were influenced by each component of the protocol used to establish the initial equivalence classes. Yield during the simultaneous protocol was not improved following the prior establishment of other baseline conditional discriminations alone. The prior establishment of the conditional discriminations plus symmetry testing produced a small increment in yield. The prior establishment of conditional discriminations plus transitivity testing produced a very large increment in yield. The prior establishment of conditional discriminations plus transitivity and symmetry testing, or symmetry, transitivity and equivalence testing (i.e., equivalence class formation) did not produce further increments in yield. Thus, the enhanced emergence of new equivalence classes under the simultaneous protocol was due to prior demonstrations of transitivity rather than to the prior establishment of other equivalence classes. Some possible behavioral processes responsible for these effects are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ADAMS, B. J. (1998). Effects of unreinforced conditional selection training, multiple negative comparison training, and reinforcement on equivalence class formation. Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty at the City University of New York.
ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L. & VERHAVE, T. (1993). The effects of test order on the establishment and expansion of equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 43, 85–105.
BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587–605.
BUFFINGTON, D. M., FIELDS, L., & ADAMS, B. J. (1997). Enhancing the formation of equivalence classes by pretraining of other equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 47, 1–20.
FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & Newman, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.
FIELDS, L., LANDON-JIMENEZ, D. V., BUFFINGTON, D. M., & ADAMS, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal distance effects after equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129–146.
FIELDS, L., & REEVE, K. E (in press). Synthesizing equivalence classes and natural categories from perceptual and relational classes. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. E., ADAMS, B. J., & VERHAVE, T. (1991). The generalization of equivalence relations: a model for natural categories. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 305–312.
FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. F., ROSEN, D., VARELAS, A., ADAMS, B. J., BELANICH, J., & HOBBIE, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 367–389.
FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.
FIELDS, L., VERHAVE, T., & FATH, S. J. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 143–157.
HARLOW, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.
HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence or consistent nonequivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81–110.
LYNCH, D. G., & CUVO, A. J. (1995). Stimulus equivalence instruction of fraction-decimal relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 115–126.
MACKINTOSH, N. N. (1977). Stimulus control: Attention factors. In. W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
PEOPLES, M., TIERNY, K. J., BRACKEN, M., & MACKAY, C. (1998). Prior learning and equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 48, 111–120.
PILGRIM, O., & GALIZIO, M. (in press). Stimulus equivalence and units of analysis. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
SAUNDERS, R. L., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227–241.
SCHUSTERMAN, R., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Aalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823–840.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc.
SMEETS, R. M., LEADER, G., & BARNES, D. (1997). Establishing stimulus classes in adults and children using a respondent-type training procedure: A followup study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285–308.
SPENCER, T. J., & CHASE, P. N. (1996). Speed analyses of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 643–659.
WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M. J., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted with support from Contract DASW01-96-K-0009-from the U.S. Army Research Institute and from a number of PSC/CUNY Research Awards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fields, L., Varelas, A., Reeve, K.F. et al. Effects of Prior Conditional Discrimination Training, Symmetry, Transitivity, and Equivalence Testing on the Emergence of New Equivalence Classes. Psychol Rec 50, 443–466 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395365
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395365