Abstract
During three experiments, 35 human, adult subjects across seven experimental conditions (5 subjects in each condition) were exposed to a respondent-type training procedure in which arbitrary stimuli (i.e., nonsense syllables) were presented, one at a time, on a computer screen. In Condition 1, Experiment 1, instructions informed the subjects that the material to be presented during the first stage of the experiment (i.e., the respondent-type training procedure) was related to the second stage (i.e., the equivalence test). Nine nonsense syllables were presented to the subjects in the form of six stimulus pairs: A1 → B1, B1 → C1, A2 → B2, B2 → C2, A3 → B3, B3 → C3. The first stimulus of each pair was presented for 1 s (e.g., A1), the computer screen was cleared for 0.5 s (the within-pair-delay) and the second stimulus in the pair (i.e., B1) was presented for 1 s. The screen cleared for 3 s (i.e., the between-pair-delay) before the next stimulus pair was presented. All six stimulus pairs were presented 10 times in a quasi-random order across 60 trials. Subjects were presented with a standard matching-to-sample equivalence test that examined the six symmetry relations (i.e., B1-A1, B2-A2, B3-A3, C1-B1, C2-B2, C3-B3) and the three equivalence relations (i.e., C1-A1, C2-A2, C3-A3). All five subjects demonstrated equivalence responding after two, three, or four exposures to the training and testing. The remaining six conditions, across the three experiments, showed that the effectiveness of the respondent-type training procedure in producing equivalence responding was dependent upon (a) the presence of longer between-pair-delays relative to the within-pair-delays and (b) the sequence in which the stimulus pairs were presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.
BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity (Commentary). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264–267.
BARNES, D., BROWNE, M., SMEETS, P. M., & ROCHE, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three- to six-year-old children. The Psychological Record. 45, 405–430.
BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.
BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.
BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & KEENAN, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19–30.
BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders. The Psychological Record, 46, 489–508.
CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES, D., HAMPSON, P. J., & LYDDY, F. (1994). A transfer of explicitly and nonexplicitly trained sequence responses through equivalence relations: An experimental demonstration and connectionist model. The Psychological Record, 44, 559–585.
DEROSE, J. C., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., GALPIN, V. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1–20.
DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.
DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251–267.
EIKESETH, S., & SMITH, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123–133.
FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., NEWMAN, S., & VERHAVE, T. (1992). Interactions among emergent relations during equivalence class formation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 125–138.
FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.
GREEN, G., SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1991). The role of instructions in the transfer of ordinal functions through equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 287–304.
GREEN, G., STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599–616.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum Press.
HEGARTY, N., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1995). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations and relating nonequivalence relations to nonequivalence relations. Paper presented during the symposium “Emerging themes in stimulus equivalence” at the Annual Conference of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Group, London, England, U.K.
MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542.
SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725–744.
SAUNDERS, R. R., SAUNDERS, K. J., KIRBY, K. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145–162.
SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory — visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. L. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Author’s Cooperative.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., GREEN, G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1990). Equivalence classes generated by sequence training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 47–63.
SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Apple-Century-Crofts.
SMEETS, P. M., SCHENK, J. J., & BARNES, D. (1995). Establishing arbitrary stimulus classes via identity matching training and nonreinforced matching with complex stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 311–328.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Delayed identity matching to complex samples: Teaching students with mental retardation spelling and the prerequisites for equivalence classes. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 19–38.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.
SUTHERLAND, R. J., & RUDY, J. W. (1989). Configurai association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory and amnesia. Psychology, 17, 129–144.
WILLIAMS, D. C., SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1995). Unreinforced conditional selection of within three-choice conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 45, 613–627.
WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M. J., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 486–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted as part of Geraldine Leader’s doctoral research program under the supervision of Dermot Barnes. Requests for reprints should be addressed to Dermot Barnes, Department of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland (e-mail: In%”stay8028@iruccvax.ucc.ie”).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leader, G., Barnes, D. & Smeets, P.M. Establishing Equivalence Relations Using a Respondent-Type Training Procedure. Psychol Rec 46, 685–706 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395192
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395192