Abstract
In Verbal behavior, Skinner (1957) provided a conceptual framework and taxonomy for the controlling variables of language that defined independent verbal operants by their functional relations to antecedents and consequences (rather than by topography or meaning). Although professional interest in this area has recently increased within the behavior analytic community, Skinner’s conceptual framework may not yet have fully impacted the experimental literature. This quantitative review of the literature examined the studies on verbal behavior that were empirical in nature, concerned with human verbal behavior, and addressed at least one verbal operant (e.g., mand, tact, echoic, autoclitic, and/or intraverbal behavior) within the experiment. The results of this review suggest that a growing body of research exists to support many of the tenets of Skinner’s conceptualization and taxonomy but many areas of verbal behavior research have yet to be addressed. Continued research in this area is crucial for the development and implementation of effective verbal behavior interventions for people with disabilities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
*Arntzen, E., & Almas, I. K. (2002). Effects of mand-tact versus tact-only training on the acquisition of tacts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 419–422.
*Baer, R.A., & Detrich, R. (1990). Tacting and manding in correspondence training: Effects of child selection on verbalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 23–30.
Bailey, J. S., & Wallander, R. J. (1999). Verbal behavior. In B. A. Thyer (Ed.), The philosophical legacy of behaviorism (pp.117–152). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
*Boe, R., & Winokur, S. (1978a). A procedure for studying echoic control in verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 213–217.
*Boe, R., & Winokur, S. (1978b). Echoic Control in conversational speech. The Journal of General Psychology, 99, 299–304.
*Bourret, J., Vollmer, T. R., & Rapp, J. T. (2004). Evaluation of vocal mand assessment and vocal mand training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 129–144.
*Bowman, L. G., Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R.H., & Piazza, C.C. (1997). On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 251–265.
*Braam, S. J., & Poling, A. (1983). Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures: Classification of verbal responses. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 4, 279–302.
*Braam, S. J., & Sundberg, M. L. (1991). The effects of specific versus nonspecific reinforcement on verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 19–28.
*Brown, K. A., Wacker, D. P., Derby, K. M., Peck, S. M., Richman, D. M., Sasso, G. M., Knutson, C. L., & Harding, J. W. (2000). Evaluating the effects if functional communication training in the presence and absence of establishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 53–71.
Carr, J. E., & Firth, A. M. (2005). The verbal behavior approach to early and intensive behavioral intervention for autism: A call for additional empirical support. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 2, 18–27.
*Carroll, R. J., & Hesse, B. E. (1987). The effects of alternating mand and tact training on the acquisition of tacts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 55–65.
*Chambers, M., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2003). Assessing the acquisition and generalization of two mand forms with adults with severe developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 265–280.
*Chase, P. N., Johnson, K. R., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1985). Verbal relations within instruction: Are there subclasses of the intraverbal? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 301–313.
*Daly, P. M. (1987). A description of the verbal behavior of students during two reading instruction methods. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 67–76.
*De Freitas Ribeiro, A. (1989). Correspondence in children’s self-report: Tacting and manding aspects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 361–367.
*DeLeon, I. G., Fisher, W. W., Herman, K. M., & Crosland, K.C. (2000). Assessment of a response bias for aggression over functionally equivalent appropriate behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 73–77.
*Derby, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W., DeRaad, A., Ulrich, S., Asmus, J., Harding, J., Prouty, A., Laffey, P., & Stoner, E. A. (1997). The long-term effects of functional communication training in home settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 507–531.
*Drasgow, E., Halle, J.W., & Ostrosky, M. (1998). Effects of differential reinforcement on the generalization of a replacement mand in three children with severe language delays. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 357–374.
*Drash, P. W., High, R. L., & Tudor, R. M. (1999). Using mand training to establish an echoic repertoire in young children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 16, 29–44.
*Duker, P. C., Dortmans, A., & Lodder, E. (1993). Establishing the manding function of communicative gestures with individuals with severe/profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 39–49.
Esch, B. E., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2005). Evaluating stimulus-stimulus pairing and direct reinforcement in the establishment of an echoic repertoire of children diagnosed with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 43–58.
Eshleman, J. W. (1991). Quantified trends in the history of verbal behavior research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 61–80.
*Ewing, C. B., Magee, S.K., & Ellis, J. (2002). The functional analysis of problematic verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 51–60.
*Finkel, A. S., & Williams, R. L. (2001). A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior in a six-year-old boy with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 61–70.
*Goh, H., Iwata, B. A., & DeLeon, I. G. (2000). Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 195–205.
Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W.W., Sullivan, M. T., Acquisto, J., & LeBlanc, L. A. (1998). Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: A summary of 21 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 211–235.
*Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185.
*Henry, L. M., & Horne, P. J. (2000). Partial remediation of speaker and listener behaviors in people with severe dementia. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 631–634.
*Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Randle, V. R. L. (2004). Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 267–288.
*Howard, J. S., & Rice, D. E. (1988). Establishing a generalized autoclitic repertoire in preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 45–59.
*Hung, D. W. (1980). Training and generalization of yes and no as mands in two autistic children. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 10, 139–152.
*Johnson, L., McComas, J., Thompson, A., & Symons, F. J. (2004). Obtained versus programmed reinforcement: Practical considerations in the treatment of escape-reinforced aggression. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 239–242.
*Kahng, S., Hendrickson, D. J., & Vu, C. P. (2000). Comparison of single and multiple functional communication training responses for the treatment of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 321–324.
*Lalli, J. S., Mauro, B. C., & Mace, F. C. (2000). Preference for unreliable reinforcement in children with mental retardation: The role of conditioned reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 533–544.
*Lamarre, J., & Holland, J. G. (1985). The functional independence of mands and tacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 5–19.
*Lane, H., & Schneider, B. (1963). Methods for slef-shaping echoic behavior. The Modern Language Journal, 47, 154–160.
*Lodhi, S., & Greer, R. D. (1989). The speaker as listener. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 353–359.
*Luciano, M. C. (1986). Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through transfer of stimulus control procedures. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 1–20.
*McDowell, E. E. (1968). A programmed method of reading instruction for use with kindergarten children. The Psychological Record, 18, 233–239.
McPherson, A., Bonem, M., Green, G., & Osborne, J. G. (1984). A citation analysis of the influence on research of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 157–167.
Michael, J. (1984). Verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 363–376.
Michael, J. (1988). Establishing operations and the mand. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 3–9.
Miguel, C. F., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2002). The effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on the vocal behavior of children diagnosed with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 3–13.
*Northup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., & DeRaad, A. (1991). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an autoclitic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509–522.
*Nuzzolo-Gomez, R., & Greer, R. D. (2004). Emergence of untaught mands or tacts of novel adjective-object pairs as a function of instructional history. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 20, 63–76.
Oah, S., & Dickinson, A. M. (1989). A review of empirical studies on verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 53–68.
*Partington, J.W., & Bailey, J.S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18.
*Partington, J. W., Sundberg, M. L., Newhouse, L., & Spengler, S.M. (1994). Overcoming an autistic child’s failure to acquire a tact repertoire. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 733–734.
*Peck, S. M., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Cooper, L. J., Brown, K. A., Richman, D., McComas, J.J., Frischmeyer, P., & Millard, T. (1996). Choice-making treatment of young children’s severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 263–290.
*Richman, D. M., Wacker, D. P., & Winborn, L. (2001). Response efficiency during functional communication training: Effects of effort on response allocation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 73–76.
*Rogers-Warren, A., & Warren, S. F. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly trained language in children. Behavior Modification, 4, 361–382.
*Ross, D. E., & Greer, R. D. (2003). Generalized imitation and the mand: Inducing first instances of speech in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 58–74.
*Sigafoos, J., Doss, S., & Reichle, J. (1989). Developing mand and tact repertoires in persons with severe developmental disabilities using graphic symbols. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 183–200.
*Sigafoos, J., Reichle, J., Doss, S., Hall, K., & Pettitt, L. (1990). “Spontaneous” transfer of stimulus control from tact to mand contingencies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 165–176.
*Simic, J., & Bucher, B. (1980). Development of spontaneous manding in language deficient children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 523–528.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Cambridge, MA: Prentice Hall.
*Sprague, J. R., & Horner, R. H. (1992). Covariation within functional response classes: Implications for treatment of severe problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 735–745.
*Stafford, M. W., Sundberg, M. L., & Braam, S.J. (1988). A preliminary investigation of the consequences that define the mand and the tact. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 61–71.
Sundberg, M. L. (1991). 301 research topics from Skinner’s book Verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 81–96.
*Sundberg, M. L., Endicott, K., & Eigenheer, P. (2000). Using intraverbal prompts to establish tacts for children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 89–104.
*Sundberg, M. L., Loeb, M., Hale, L., & Eigenheer, P. (2002). Contriving establishing operations to teach mands for information. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 15–29.
Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724.
*Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C.A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.
*Sundberg, M. L., San Juan, B., Dawdy, M., & Arguelles, M. (1990). The acquisition of tacts, mands, and intraverbals by individuals with traumatic brain injury. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 83–99.
*Tenenbaum, H. A., & Wolking, W. D. (1989). Effects of oral rate and inflection on intraverbal responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 83–89.
*Twyman, J.S. (1996). The functional independence of impure mands and tacts of abstract stimulus properties. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 1–19.
*Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Lalli, J. S., & Daniel, D. (1999). Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 451–466.
*Watkins, C. L., Pack-Teixeira, L., & Howard, J. S. (1989). Teaching intraverbal behavior to severely retarded children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 69–81.
*Williams, G., & Greer, R. D. (1993). A comparison of verbal-behavior and linguistic-communication curricula for training developmentally delayed adolescents to acquire and maintain vocal speech. Behaviorology, 1, 31–46.
*Winborn, L., Wacker, D. P., Richman, D. M., Asmus, J., & Geier, D. (2002). Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 295–298.
*Yamamoto, J., & Mochizuki, A. (1988). Acquisition and functional analysis of manding with autistic students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 57–64.
*Yoon, S. Y., & Bennett, G. M. (2000). Effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on conditioning vocal sounds as reinforcers. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 75–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sautter, R.A., LeBlanc, L.A. Empirical Applications of Skinner’s Analysis of Verbal Behavior with Humans. Analysis Verbal Behav 22, 35–48 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393025
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393025