Abstract
Some researchers claim that variability is an operant dimension of behavior. The present paper reviews the concept of operant behavior and emphasizes that differentiation is the behavioral process that demonstrates an operant relation. Differentiation is conceived as change in the overlap between two probability distributions: the distribution of reinforcement probability as a function of some response property (S distribution) and the probability distribution of the response property itself (R distribution). This concept implies that the differentiation process can be measured only if S distribution and R distribution are both established on the same response property. To determine whether the differentially reinforced behavioral variability fits the proposed concept of operant behavior, I examine the main procedures (lag n and threshold procedures) and the main dependent variable (U value) employed in the studies of operant variability. Because lag n and threshold procedures establish their S distributions on properties distinct from U value, differentiation cannot be measured over the change in U value. I conclude that studies of operant variability have failed to provide a direct demonstration that variability is an operant dimension of behavior. Hence, studies in which measures of variability provide a basis to measure differentiation can better support the claim that variability is an operant dimension of behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abreu-Rodrigues, J., Lattal, K. A., Dos Santos, C. V., & Matos, R. A. (2005). Variation, repetition, and choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83, 147–168. doi:10.1901/jeab.2005.33-03
Attneave, F. (1959). Applications of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Barba, L. S., & Hunziker, M. H. L. (2002). Variabilidade comportamental produzida por dois esquemas de reforçamento [Behavioral variability produced by two reinforcement schedules]. Acta Comportamentalia, 10(1), 5–22.
Barba, L. S., & Hunziker, M. H. L. (2002). Variabilidade comportamental produzida por dois esquemas de reforçamento [Behavioral variability produced by two reinforcement schedules]. Acta Comportamentalia, 10(1), 5–22.
Catania, A. C. (1973). The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 1, 103–116.
Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cohen, L., Neuringer, A., & Rhodes, D. (1990). Effects of ethanol on reinforced variations and repetitions by rats under a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 1–12. doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.54-1
Denney, J., & Neuringer, A. (1998). Behavioral variability is controlled by discriminative stimuli. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 154–162. doi:10.3758/BF03199208
Doughty, A. H., & Lattal, K. A. (2001). Resistance to change of operant variation and repetition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 195–215. doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-195
Galbicka, G. (1988). Differentiating The Behavior of Organisms. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 343–354. doi:10.1901/jeab.1988.50-343
Grunow, A., & Neuringer, A. (2002). Learning to vary and varying to learn. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 250–258.
Hunziker, M. H. L., Saldana, L., & Neuringer, A. (1996). Behavioral variability in SHR and WKY rats as a function of rearing environment and reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 129–144. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.65-129
Machado, A. (1997). Increasing the variability of response sequences in pigeons by adjusting the frequency of switching between two keys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 1–25. doi:10.1901/jeab.1997.68-1
Morgan, L., & Neuringer, A. (1990). Behavioral variability as a function of response topography and reinforcement contingency. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 257–263. doi:10.3758/BF03205284
Neuringer, A. (1991). Operant variability and repetition as functions of interresponse time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 3–12. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.17.1.3
Neuringer, A. (2002). Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 672–705. doi:10.3758/BF03196324
Neuringer, A. (2003). Creativity and reinforced variability. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 323–338). New York, NY: Klewer Academic/Plenum.
Neuringer, A. (2004). Reinforced variability in animals and people. American Psychologist, 59, 891–906. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.9.891
Neuringer, A. (2009). Operant variability and the power of reinforcement. The Behavior Analyst Today, 10, 319–343.
Neuringer, A., Deiss, C., & Olson, G. (2000). Reinforced variability and operant learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 98–111. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.26.1.98
Neuringer, A., & Huntley, R. W. (1992). Reinforced variability in rats: Effects of gender, age and contingency. Physiology & Behavior, 51, 145–149. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(92)90216-O
Neuringer, A., Kornell, N., & Olufs, M. (2001). Stability and variability in extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 79–94. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.27.1.79
Odum, A. L., Ward, R. D., Barnes, C. A., & Burke, K. A. (2006). The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 159–179. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.58-05
Page, S., & Neuringer, A. (1985). Variability is an operant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 429–452. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.11.3.429
Ross, C., & Neuringer, A. (2002). Reinforcement of variations and repetitions along three independent response dimensions. Behavioural Processes, 57, 199–209. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00014-1
Schoenfeld, W. N., Harris, A. H., & Farmer, J. (1966). Conditioning response variability. Psychological Reports, 19, 551–557. doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.2.551
Schwartz, B. (1982). Failure to produce response variability with reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 171–181. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-171
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York, NY: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Ward, R. D., Kynaston, A. D., Bailey, E. M., & Odum, A. L. (2008). Discriminative control of variability: Effects of successive stimulus reversal. Behavioural Processes, 78, 17–24. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.11.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I thank Patrick Diamond for reviewing the style of this paper. I also thank Armando Machado for his helpful comments on its content. Finally, I thank Maria de Lourdes Passos for her helpful comments on the content and style of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barba, L.d.S. Operant variability: A conceptual analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 35, 213–227 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392280
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392280