Skip to main content
Log in

A generalizability study of the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-12) in non-clinical adolescents

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most frequently used measures of eating and weight problems is the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT). The paper discusses conceptual heterogeneity in the EAT in the light of eating disorder continuum theory. Psychometric qualities of the Norwegian 12-item version of the EAT was based on a sample of 224 female and 261 male adolescents aged 14–15 years. Generalizability theory enabled us to study the impact of multiple sources of measurement errors of the EAT-12. The analyses suggest that acceptable generalizability is achieved by the present design on applying 4 items within 3 categories of the EAT. Alternative designs are suggested, and the utility of G-theory is discussed. The results also provide evidence of a gender difference in the structure of the universe score variance. Non-clinical adolescents’ ways of organizing information about food and eating are discussed in the light of gender differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garner D.M., Garfinkel P.E.: The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychol. Med., 9, 273–279, 1979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Szmukler G.I.: The epidemiology of anorexia nervosa and bulimia. J. Psychiatry Res., 19, 143–153, 1985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. King M.B.: Eating disorders in a general practice population: Prevalence, characteristics and follow-up at 12–18 months. Psychol. Med., suppl. 14, 1989.

  4. Garner D.M., Olmsted M.P., Bohr Y., Garfinkel P.E.: The Eating Attitudes Test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol. Med. 12, 871–878, 1982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheinberg Z., Koslowsky M., Bleich A., Mark M., Apter A., Danon Y., Solomon Z., Babur I.: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value as measures of prediction accuracy: The case of the EAT-26. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 831–839, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Furnham A., Boughton L.: Eating behaviour and body dissatisfaction among dieters, aerobic exercisers and a control group. Eur. Eating Disord. Rev. 3, 35–45, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S., Lee A.M., Leung T.: Cross-cultural validity of the Eating Disorder Inventory: A study of Chinese patients with eating disorders in Hong Kong. Int. J. Eating Disord., 23, 177–188, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Button E.J., Whitehouse A.: Subclinical anorexia nervosa. Psychol. Med., 11, 509–516, 1981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams R.L.: Use of the Eating Attitudes Test and Eating Disorder Inventory in adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health, 8, 266–272, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wichstrøm L.: Social, psychological and physical correlates of eating problems. A study of the general population in Norway. Psychol. Med., 25, 567–579, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nylander J.: The feeling of being fat and dieting in a school population: Epidemiologic interview investigation. Acta Sociomedica Scand., 3, 17–26, 1971.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson D.A., Anderson D.A., Jackman L.P., Jackson S.R.: Assessment of eating disordered thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. In: Allison D.B. (Ed.) Handbook of assessment methods for eating behaviors and weight-related problems. Measures, theory, and research. California, Sage Publications Inc., 1995, pp. 561–580.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lavik N.J., Clausen S.E., Pedersen W.: Eating behaviour, drug use, psychopathology and parental bonding in adolescents in Norway. Acta Psychiatr. Scand., 84, 387–390, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smead V.S., Richert A.J.: Eating Attitude Test factors in an unselected undergraduate population. Int. J. Eating Disord., 9, 211–215, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cronbach L.J., Gleser G.C., Nanda H., Rajaratnam N.: The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York, Wiley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schoemaker C., van Strien T., van der Staak C.: Validation of the Eating Disorders Inventory in a nonclinical population using transformed and untransformed responses. Int. J. Eating Disord., 15, 387–393, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cronbach L.J.: Methodological studies: A personal retrospective. In: Snow R.E., Wiley D.E. (Eds.) Improving inquiry in social sciences: A volume in honor of Lee J. Cronbach. Hills dale, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991, pp. 385–410.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Messick S.: Validity of psychological assessment. Am. Psychol., 50, 741–749, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shavelson R.J., Webb N.M.: Generalizability theory. A primer. California, Sage Publications Inc., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rabinowitz W., Eikeland H-M.: Estimating the reliability of test with clustered items. Scand. J. Ed. Res. (Pedagogisk forskning), 8, 85–106, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajaratnam N., Cronbach L.J., Gleser G.C.: Generalizability of stratified-parallel tests. Psychometrika, 30, 39–56, 1965.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brennan R.L.: Elements of generalizability theory (rev. ed.). Iowa City, IA, American College Testing, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crick J.E., Brennan R.L.: Manual for GENOVA: A Generalized Analysis of Variance System. Iowa, ACT Technical Bulletin, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang M.C., Stanley J.C.: Differential weighting: A review of methods and empirical studies. Rev. Educ. Res., 40, 663–705, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benson J., Hagtvet K.A.: The interplay among design, data analysis and theory in the measurement of coping. In Zeidner M., Endler N.S. (Eds.) Handbook of coping: Theory, research, application. New York, Wiley, 1996, pp. 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelsen, B.K., Hagtvet, K.A. A generalizability study of the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-12) in non-clinical adolescents. Eat Weight Disord 4, 179–186 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339734

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339734

Key words

Navigation