Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The agreement between the MedGem® indirect calorimeter and a standard indirect calorimeter in anorexia nervosa

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: Measurement of the basal metabolic rate (BMR) can be used to estimate the calories required for weight gain during refeeding in anorexia nervosa (AN). The reference method for measuring the BMR is indirect calorimetry. MedGem has developed a new indirect calorimeter that calculates the metabolic rate much more quickly than standard indirect calorimeters. This study compared the BMR measured by the MedGem and standard indirect calorimetry in an AN population. Methods: We measured the BMR using the Deltatrac metabolic cart followed immediately by the MedGem indirect calorimeter in 27 subjects (12 patients and 15 controls). Results: Bland-Altman plots show that there is poor agreement between the BMR reported by the MedGem compared to the Deltatrac. Discussion: Until better agreement with standard indirect calorimetry can be shown the MedGem should not be used for calorimetry in AN. Possible factors that may limit the MedGem’s reliability include patient discomfort with the mouthpiece, use of a fixed RQ, and the short sampling period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coss-Bu J.A., Jefferson L.S., Walding D., David Y., Smith E.O., Klish W.J.: Resting energy expenditure in children in a pediatric intensive care unit: comparison of Harris-Benedict and Talbot predictions with indirect calorimetry values. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 67, 74–80, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Littlewood R.A., White M.S., Bell K.L., Davies P.S., Cleghorn G.J., Grote R.: Comparison of the Cosmed K4 b(2) and the Deltatrac II metabolic cart in measuring resting energy expenditure in adults. Clin. Nutr., 21, 491–497, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McClave S.A., Lowen C.C., Kleber M.J., McConnell J.W., Jung L.Y., Goldsmith L.J.: Clinical use of the respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. JPEN J. Parent. Enter. Nutr., 27, 21–26, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tissot S., Delafosse B., Bertrand O., Bouffard Y., Viale J.P., Annat G.: Clinical validation of the Deltatrac monitoring system in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med, 21, 149–153, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weissman C., Sardar A., Kemper M.: In vitro evaluation of a compact metabolic measurement instrument. JPEN J. Parent. Enter. Nutr., 14, 216–221, 1990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieman D.C., Trone G.A., Austin M.D.: A new handheld device for measuring resting metabolic rate and oxygen consumption. J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 103, 588–592, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kato M., Tajika M., Miwa Y., Moriwaki H.: Validation of a portable indirect calorimeter (Metavine) for measuring energy expenditure in an elderly population. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol., (Suppl.), S9–S12, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schwenk A., Merilainen P.T., Macallan D.C.: Indirect calorimetry in patients with active respiratory infection- prevention of cross-infection. Clin. Nutr., 21, 385–388, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schebendach J.: The use of indirect calorimetry in the clinical management of adolescents with nutritional disorders. Adolesc. Med., 14, 77–85, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eating Disorder Program, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6Z 1Y6

    J. Hlynsky,  C. Laird Birmingham, M. Johnston & S. Gritzner

Authors
  1. J. Hlynsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Laird Birmingham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Gritzner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Laird Birmingham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hlynsky, J., Birmingham, C.L., Johnston, M. et al. The agreement between the MedGem® indirect calorimeter and a standard indirect calorimeter in anorexia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord 10, e83–e87 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327496

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327496

Keywords

Search

Navigation