Skip to main content
Log in

What you use decides what you get: Comparing classificatory procedures for the Adult Attachment Interview in eating disorder research

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Studies of attachment and eating disorders use different types of measures, including different coding procedures for the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). Generalizability of findings across studies is therefore uncertain. We compare the Main & Goldwyn procedure with the Dynamic Maturational Method, the two most common procedures for classifying AAI in eating disorder research. The sample consists of 20 female patients with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (mean age 22.9 (3.5) years). Attachment insecurity is by far most common, regardless of procedure. Within the insecure categories, there is little overlap between procedures in comparable categories. Both procedures discriminate between Anorexia subgroups (restricting vs bingeing), but do so differently. Findings suggest that comparing findings across methods, beyond the secure/insecure dichotomy, should be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zachrisson HD, Skårderud F. Feelings of insecurity: review of attachment and eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2010; 18: 97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Shaughnessy R, Dallos R. Attachment research and eating disorders: a review of the literature. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009; 14: 559–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dozier M, Stovall-McClough C, Albus KE. Attachment and psychopathology in adulthood. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (Eds) Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical implications, 2nd Ed. New York and London, The Guilford Press, 2008, pp 718–44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, et al. Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J. Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In: Bretherton I, Waters E. (Eds). Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1985; 50: 66–104.

    Google Scholar 

  6. George C, Kaplan N, Main M. Adult Attachment Interview Protocol. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hesse E. The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (Eds) Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical implications. 2nd Ed. New York and London, The Guilford Press, 2008, pp 552–98.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crittenden PM. A Dynamic-Maturational approach to continuity and change in patterns of attachment. In: Crittenden PM, Claussen AH (Eds) The organization of attachment relationships. Maturation, culture and context. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp 343–57.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kobak RR. The attachment Q-sort. 1993, Unpublished manual.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crowell J, Fraley RC, Shaver PR. Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (Eds) Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical implications. 2nd Ed. New York and London, The Guilford Press, 2008, pp 599–635.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crittenden PM. Patterns of attachment in adulthood: A dynamic-maturation approach to analyzing “The Adult Attachment Interview”. Unpublished manuscript, Miami, FL, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zachrisson HD, Kulbotten GR. Attachment in anorexia nervosa: an exploration of associations with eating disorder psychopathology and psychiatric symptoms. Eat Weight Disord 2006; 11: 163–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z. The Eating Disorder Examination (12th Ed). In: Fairburn CG (Ed) Binge eating: nature, assessment and treatment. New York, The Guilford Press, 1993, pp 317–31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crittenden PM, Claussen AN. The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture and context. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. D. Zachrisson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zachrisson, H.D., Sommerfeldt, B. & Skårderud, F. What you use decides what you get: Comparing classificatory procedures for the Adult Attachment Interview in eating disorder research. Eating Weight Disord. 16, e285–e288 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327474

Key words

Navigation