ABSTRACT
Studies of attachment and eating disorders use different types of measures, including different coding procedures for the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). Generalizability of findings across studies is therefore uncertain. We compare the Main & Goldwyn procedure with the Dynamic Maturational Method, the two most common procedures for classifying AAI in eating disorder research. The sample consists of 20 female patients with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (mean age 22.9 (3.5) years). Attachment insecurity is by far most common, regardless of procedure. Within the insecure categories, there is little overlap between procedures in comparable categories. Both procedures discriminate between Anorexia subgroups (restricting vs bingeing), but do so differently. Findings suggest that comparing findings across methods, beyond the secure/insecure dichotomy, should be avoided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zachrisson HD, Skårderud F. Feelings of insecurity: review of attachment and eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2010; 18: 97–106.
O’Shaughnessy R, Dallos R. Attachment research and eating disorders: a review of the literature. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009; 14: 559–74.
Dozier M, Stovall-McClough C, Albus KE. Attachment and psychopathology in adulthood. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (Eds) Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical implications, 2nd Ed. New York and London, The Guilford Press, 2008, pp 718–44.
Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, et al. Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1978.
Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J. Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In: Bretherton I, Waters E. (Eds). Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1985; 50: 66–104.
George C, Kaplan N, Main M. Adult Attachment Interview Protocol. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 1984.
Hesse E. The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (Eds) Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical implications. 2nd Ed. New York and London, The Guilford Press, 2008, pp 552–98.
Crittenden PM. A Dynamic-Maturational approach to continuity and change in patterns of attachment. In: Crittenden PM, Claussen AH (Eds) The organization of attachment relationships. Maturation, culture and context. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp 343–57.
Kobak RR. The attachment Q-sort. 1993, Unpublished manual.
Crowell J, Fraley RC, Shaver PR. Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (Eds) Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical implications. 2nd Ed. New York and London, The Guilford Press, 2008, pp 599–635.
Crittenden PM. Patterns of attachment in adulthood: A dynamic-maturation approach to analyzing “The Adult Attachment Interview”. Unpublished manuscript, Miami, FL, USA, 2004.
Zachrisson HD, Kulbotten GR. Attachment in anorexia nervosa: an exploration of associations with eating disorder psychopathology and psychiatric symptoms. Eat Weight Disord 2006; 11: 163–70.
Fairburn CG, Cooper Z. The Eating Disorder Examination (12th Ed). In: Fairburn CG (Ed) Binge eating: nature, assessment and treatment. New York, The Guilford Press, 1993, pp 317–31.
Crittenden PM, Claussen AN. The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture and context. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zachrisson, H.D., Sommerfeldt, B. & Skårderud, F. What you use decides what you get: Comparing classificatory procedures for the Adult Attachment Interview in eating disorder research. Eating Weight Disord. 16, e285–e288 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327474
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327474