Abstract
This study investigated how early childhood education (ECE) (PreK-3) preservice teachers’ ideas about science education change as a result of implementing an inquiry-based curriculum within an ECE science methods course (ten-week quarter). Fifty-two preservice teachers, including 50 females and 2 males, with 2 members of an ethnic minority group were part of the study. The preservice teachers’ knowledge and undertanding of how to implement inquiry learning deepened over the tenweek period. The preservice teachers seemed to gain some confidence in implementing inquiry learning. Preservice teachers need to have focused science teaching time with primary students to strengthen and support their confidence, attitudes, and abilities to implement inquiry learning. Also, support for inquiry learning must come from K-12 educators as well as arts and science faculty, as this is where preservice teachers can develop substantive content knowledge within authentic science learning experiences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abruscato, J. (2004).Teaching children science: A discovery approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990).Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Bianchini, J., & Solomon, E. (2002). Constructing views of science tied to issues of equity and diversity: A study of beginning science teachers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 53–76.
Cobern, W., & Loving, C. (2002). An investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1016–1031.
Dobey, D. C., & Schafer, L. E. (1984). The effects of knowledge on elementary science inquiry teaching.Science Education, 68(1), 39–51.
Edwards, C. (1997). Promoting student inquiry.The Science Teacher, 3, 18–21.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967).The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.
Hand, B., & Peterson, R. (1995). The development, trial and evaluation of a constructivist teaching and learning approach in a preservice science teacher education program.Research in Science Education, 25(1), 75–88.
Jorgeston, M. (1994). Contrasts and similarities in case studies of teacher reflection and change.Curriculum Inquiry, 24(1), 9–26.
Llewellyn, D. (2002).Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Meyer, K. M. (1994). Enacting project-based science.The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 517–538.
Mastropieri, M., Scruggs, T., Mantzicopoulos, P., Sturgeon, A., Goodwin, L., & Chung, S. (1998). A place where living things affect and depend on each other: Qualitative and quantitative outcomes associated with inclusive science teaching.Science Education, 82(2), 163–179.
Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science.Science Education, 82(2), 197–214.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
National Science Teachers Association (NATA). (1998). NSTA position statement: The national science education standards: A vision for the improvement of science and learning.Science Scope, 65(5), 32–34.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Patton, M. Q. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, G., & Staver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers.Science Education, 80(3), 283–315.
Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 589–622.
Rubba, P. (1992). The learning cycle as a model for the design of science teacher preservice and inservice education.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(4), 97–101.
Stofflett, R. T., & Stoddart, T. (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 31–51.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992).Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Zuzovsky, R., & Tamir, P. (1999). Growth patterns in students’ ability to supply scientific explanations: Findings from the third international mathematics and science study in Israel.International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1101–1121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plevyak, L.H. What do preservice teachers learn in an inquiry-based science methods course?. J Elem Sci Edu 19, 1–12 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173650
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173650