Abstract
It is argued in this lecture that Ryder’s approach to the study of the role of the cohort in social change is too narrow. Cohorts do not only permit change; they actively create the options succeeding cohorts have to choose from. Through its own choice from amongst the options perceived, each cohort both limits and enriches the options of the next. It is through the choice people make with regard to life shaping demographic events that they group themselves into ‘mental’ cohorts. The course of demographic events in Western Europe in the postwar period is difficult to understand if one does not appreciate that these events form a sequence. A sequence generated by the quite specific option(s) each ‘mental’ cohort, through its own choice, created for the next. Current demographic patterns in Europe have to be interpreted in terms of differences in social and cultural heritage of the countries concerned, and in terms of the differences in options perceived and selected.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Becker, H.A. (ed.). 1991.Life Histories and Generations. Two Volumes. Utrecht: ISOR.
Blom, S., T. Noack and L. Ostby. 1993.Giftermal og barn — bedre sent enn aldri? Oslo-Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
Bosveld, W. 1996.The Ageing of Fertility in Europe: A Comparative Demographic-Analytic Study. Amsterdam: PDOD Publications, Thesis Publishers.
Bracher, M., G. Santow, S.P. Morgan and J. Trussell. 1993. Marriage dissolution in Australia: models and explanations.Population Studies 47(3):403–427.
Cliquet, R.L. and H.G. Moors. 1986. De anticonceptionele revolutie in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Pp.59–70 in D.J. van de Kaa and R. Lesthaeghe (eds),Bevolking: Groei en Krimp. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.
Conrad, C., M. Lechner and W. Werner. 1996. East German fertility after unification: crisis or adaptation?Population and Development Review 22:331–359.
Council of Europe. 1996.Recent Demographic Developments in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, de Feijter, H. 1991.Voorlopers bij Demografische Veranderingen. Den Haag: Netherlands Interuniversity Demographic Institute, de Rooy, P. 1986. Vetkuifje waarheen? Jongeren in Nederland in de jaren vijftig en zestig. In H.W. von der Dunket al. (eds),Wederopbouw, Welvaart en Onrust. Houten: Uitgeverij den Haan.
Festy, P. 1994. L’enfant dans la famille. Vingt ans de changement dans l’environnement familal des enfants.Population 49(6): 1245–1297.
Frijhoff, W. 1996.Eigenzinnig Nederland: Het Verleden in de Toekomst van een Cultuurnatie. Amsterdam: NWO-OKW Voorjaarslezing. 8 mei 1996.
Hall, D.R. 1993.Reproductive Individualism: Exploring the Relationship between Religion, Cohabitation and Divorce. Discussion Paper 93–9. London: Population Studies Centre.
Hobcraft, J. and K. Kiernan. 1995. Becoming a parent in Europe. Pp.27–61 inEvolution or Revolution in European Population, European Population Conference, Milano 1995. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Höpflinger, F. 1987.Wandel der Familienbildung in Westeuropa. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Jones, G.W. 1993. Is demographic uniformity inevitable?Journal of the Australian Population Association 10(1): 1–16.
Kaufmann, F.X. 1988. Familie und Modernität. Pp.391–415 in K. Liischer, F. Schultheis and M. Wehrspaun (eds),Die Postmoderne Familie. Konstanzer Beitrage zur Sozialwissenschaft-liche Forschung, Band 3. Kieraan, K. 1993. The future of partnership and fertility.Population Studies No. 26. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Kiernan, K. 1995. Foreword. In C. Prinz,Cohabiting, Married, or Single. Aldershot, Avebury: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Klijzing, E. and M. Macura. 1996. Cohabitation and extra-marital childbearing: early FFS evidence. Manuscript.
Kuijsten, A.C. 1996. Changing family patterns in Europe: A case of divergence?European Journal of Population 12:115–143.
Leridon, H. 1985. La baisse de la fécondité depuis 1965: moins d’enfants désirés et moinsd de grosesses non désireés.Population 40(3):507–528.
Leridon, H., Y. Charbit, P. Collomb, J.P. Sardon and L. Toulemon. 1987.La Seconde Révolution Contraceptive. Institut National d’Etudes Demographiques Travaux et Documents Cahiers No. 117. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Lesthaeghe, R. and G. Verleye. 1992. De tweede demografische transitie; conceptuele basis en recente evolutie. In N. van Nimwegen and J. de Jong-Gierveld (eds),De Demografische Uitdaging: Nederland en Europa op Weg naar de 2lste Eeuw. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
McCauley, C.R. 1995. Are stereotypes exaggerated? A sampling of racial, gender, academic, occupational, and political stereotypes. Pp.215–245 in Y-T. Lee, L.J. Jussim and C.R. McCauley (eds),Stereotype Accuracy: Toward Appreciating Group Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Manting, D. 1994.Dynamics in Marriage and Cohabitation. An Inter-temporal, Life Course Analysis of First Union Formation and Dissolution. Amsterdam: PDOD Publications, Thesis Publishers.
McNicoll, G. 1993.Institutional Analysis of Fertility. Stockholm: Lecture Beyer Institute.
Micheli, G.A. 1996. New patterns of family formation in Italy. Which tools for which interpretations?Genus LII: 15–52.
Moors, H.G. 1974.Child Spacing and Family Size in the Netherlands. A publication of the Netherlands Interuniversity Demographic Institute. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.
Murphy, M. 1993. The contraceptive pill and women’s employment as factors in fertility change in Britain 1963–1980: A challenge to the conventional view.Population Studies 47:221–243.
Ottati, V. and Yuen-Ting Lee. 1995. Accuracy: a neglected component of stereotype research. Pp.29–63 in Y-T. Lee, L.J. Jussim and C.R. McCauley (eds),Stereotype Accuracy: Toward Appreciating Group Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Prioux, F. 1993. L’infécondité en Europe. Pp.231–255 in A. Blum and J-L. Rallu (eds),European Population. II Demographic Dynamics. Montrouge: John Libbey Eurotext.
Prinz, C. 1995.Cohabiting, Married or Single. Aldershot, Avebury: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Quetelet, A. 1842.A Treatise on Man and the Development of his Faculties. New York; Edinburgh: Burt Franklin. (Reprinted 1968).
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. Pp.28–50 in E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds),Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roussel, L. and P. Festy. 1978.L’’évolution Recente des Attitudes et Comportements a I’Egard de la Familie dans les états Membres du Conseil de I’Europe. Paris: Institut National d’Etudes Demographiques.
Roussel, L. 1992. La familie en Europe Occidentale: divergences et convergences.Population 1:133–152.
Roussel, L. 1994. Fertility and family. Pp.35–110 inProceedings European Population Conference, Geneva, 1993, Volume 1. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Ryder, N.B. 1970. The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. Pp.90–97 in T.R. Fordet al. (eds),Social Demography. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Santow, G. 1989. A sequence of events in fertility and family formation? Pp.217–227 inInternational Population Conference New Delhi, 20–27 September 1989, Volume 3. International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP).
Statistisk Sentralbyrå. 1991.Family and Occupation Survey 1988. Oslo-Kongsvinger.
van de Kaa, D.J. 1987. Europe’s second demographic transition.Population Bulletin 42(1). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
van de Kaa, D.J. 1994. The second demographic transition revisited: theories and expectations. Pp.81–126 in G.C.N. Beetset al. (eds),Population and Family in the Low Countries 1993: Late Fertility and Other Current Issues. Lisse; Berwyn, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van de Kaa, D.J. Options and sequences: Europe’s demographic patterns. Journal of Population Research 14, 1–29 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029484
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029484