Résumé
Depuis la découverte des rayons X il y a 100 ans, l’imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) est appelée à jouer un des rôles les plus importants du diagnostic médical. L’efficacité de l’IRM a été démontrée dans une grande variété de troubles gastro-intestinaux. L’attention du gastro-entérologue est couramment centrée sur les maladies des voies bilio-pancréatiques et intestinales. La cholangiopancréatographie par résonance magnétique (CPRM) est devenue une technique d’imagerie compétitive et assue même le remplacement du diagnostic par CPRE dans un grand nombre de pathologies hépato-biliaires et pancréatiques. L’entéroscopie en IRM s’impose comme la méthode de choix dans l’évaluation de la totalité de l’intestin grêle, tandis qu’en revanche la coloscopie virtuelle est loin d’être promue au rang d’examen de dépistage en cas de suspicion d’affections coliques.
L’IRM a marqué un tournant historique en gastroentérologie et devrait devenir une technique interdisciplinaire, par exemple, dans la coopération entre radiologues et gastro-entérologues qui, par leurs approches différentes et variées, apportent une indication précise et un interprétation correcte.
Summary
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been considered as the most important development in medical diagnosis since the discovery of the x-ray more than 100 years ago. The effectiveness of MRI has been expanded to a variety of gastrointestinal disorders. The gastroenterologist’s attention is currently focussed on bilio-pancreatic and bowel diseases. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has become a competitive replacement for diagnostic ERCP in a variety of hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases. MR enteroscopy has a potential to become the preferable method for evaluating the entire small bowel, while on the other hand virtual colonoscopy is far from being promoted as a tool for general screening purposes in suspected colon diseases. In summary whether or not the survival of endoscopy is under debate, MRI could mark a historic turning point in gastroenterology. So MRI hardware might be interdisciplinary used by, for example, radiologists and gastreenterologists.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Références
ADAMEK H.E., ALBERT J., BEEER H., WEITZ M., SCHILLING D., RIEMANN J.F. — Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study.Lancet, 2000,356, 190–193.
HINTZE R.E., ADLER A., VELTZKE W., ABOU REBYEH H., HAMMERSTING R., VOGL T., FELIX R. — Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).Endoscopy, 1997,29, 182–187.
HENNIG J., NAUERTH A., FRIEDBURG H. — Rare imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR.Magn. Reson. Med., 1986,3, 823–833.
WALLNER B.K., SCHUMACHER K.A., WEIDENMEIER W., FRIDRICH J.M. — Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast enhanced fast sequence.Radiology, 1991,181, 805–808.
SOTO J.A., BARISH M.A., YUCEL E.K., SIEGENBERG D., FERRUCI J.T., CUTTANI R. — Magnetic resonance cholagiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Gastroenterology, 1996,110, 589–597.
LAOCPESSI A., BOUILLET P., SAUTEREAU D., CESSOT F., DESPORT J.C., LE SIDANER A., PILLEGAND B. — Value of magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2001,96, 2354–2359.
ZIDI S.H., PRAT F., LE GUEN O., RONDEAU Y., ROCHER L., FRITSCH J. CHOURY A.D., PELLETIER G. — Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.Gut, 1999,44, 118–122.
CALVO M.M., BUJANDA L., CALDERON A., HERAS I., CABRIADA J., BERNAL A., ORIVE V., CAPELASTEGI A. — Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.Mayo Clin. Proc., 2002,77, 422–428.
KOBO S., HAMBA H., HIROHASHI K., KINOSHITA H., LEE K.C., YAMAZAKI O., NISHIO H., YAMADA R. — Magnetic resonance cholangiography in hepatic lithiasis.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1997,92, 629–631.
ADAMEK H.E., SCHILLING D., WEITZ M., RIEMANN J.F. — Choledochocele imaged with magnetic Resonance Cholangiography.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2000,95, 1082–1083.
ADAMEK H.E., ALBERT J., WEITZ M., BREER H., SCHILLING D., RIEMANN J.F. — A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction.Gut, 1998,43, 680–683.
HINTZE R.E., ABOU-REBYEH H., ADLER A., VELTZKE-SCHLIEKER W., FELIX R., WIEDENMANN B. — Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography-guided unilateral endoscopic stent placement for Klatskin tumors.Gastrointest. Edosc., 2001,53, 40–46.
MATOS C., METENS T., DEVIERE J., NICAISE N., BRAUDE P., VAN YPEREN G., CREMER M., STRUYVEN J. — Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation.Radiology, 1997,203, 435–441.
CAPPELIEZ O., DELHAYE M., DEVIERE J., LE MOINE O., METENS T., NICAISE N., CREMER M., STRYUVEN J., MATOS C. — Chronic pancreatitis: Evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR Pancreatography after secretin stimulation.Radiology, 2000,215, 358–364.
ALBERT J., SCHILLING D., BREER H., JUNGIUS K.P., RIEMANN J.F., ADAMEK H.E. — Mucinous cystadenomas and intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.Endoscopy, 2000,32, 472–476.
SICA G.T., BRAVER J., COONEY M.J., MILLER F.H., CHAI J.L., AADAMS D.F. — Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.Radiology, 1999,210, 605–610.
UMSCHADEN H.W., SZOLAR D., GASSER J., UMSCHADEN M., HASELBACH H. — Small-bowel Disease: Comparison of MR Enteroclysis Images with Conventional Enteroclysis and surgical findings.Radiology, 2000,215, 717–725.
HANSMANN H.J., HESS T., HAHMANN M., ERB G., ELSING C., RICHTER G.M., DUX M. — MRI in chronic inflammatory bowel disease.Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr, 2001,173, 4–11.
ALBERT J., BREER H., SCHEIDT T., BASLER B., SCHILLING D., LAYER G., ADAMEK H.E., RIEMANN J.F. — Chronic inflammatory bowel disease: magnetic resonance imaging within the spectrum of modern diagnosis.Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2002,127, 1089–1095.
RIEBER A., ASCHOFF A., NUSSLE K., WRUK D., TOMCZAK R., REINSHAGEN M., ADLER G., BRAMBS H.J. — MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis.Eur. Radiol., 2000,10, 1377–1382.
ALBERT J. SCHEIDT T., BASLER B., PAHLE U., SCHILLING D., LAYER G., RIEMANN J.F., ADAMEK H.E. — Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and follow-up of inflammatory bowel disease—Is conventional enteroclysm still necessary. In press,Z. Gastroenterol., 2002.
WINAWER S.J., ZAUBER A.G., HO M.N., O’BRIEN M.J., GOTTIEB L.S., STERNBERG S.S., WAYE J.D., SCHAPIRO M., BOND J.H., PANISH J.F.et al. — Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.N. Engl. J. Med., 1993,329, 1977–1981.
FENLON H.M., NUNES D.P., SCHROY P.C. 3rd, BARISH M.A., CLARKE P.D., FERRUCCI J.T. — A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.N. Engl. J. Med., 1999,341, 1496–1503.
YEE J., AKERKAR G.A., HUNG R.K., STEINAUER-GEBAUER A.M., WALL S.D., McQUAID K.R. — Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.Radiology, 2001,219, 685–692.
LUBOLDT W., BAUERFEIND P., WILDERMUTH S., MARINCEK B., FRIED M., DEBATIN J.F. — Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.Radiology, 2000,216, 383–388.
PAPPALARDO G., POLETTINI E., FRATTAROLI F.M., CASCIANI E., D’ORTA C., D’AMATO M., GUALDI G.F. — Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.Gastroenterology 2000,119, 300–304.
LAUENSTEIN T., GOEHDE S., RUEHM S., HOLTMANN G., DEBATIN J.F. — MR colonography with Barium-based Fecal Tagging: initial clinical experience.Radiology, 2002,223, 248–254.
FENLON H.M., McANENY D.B., NUNES D.P., CLARKE P.D., FERRUCCI J.T. — Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon.Radiology, 210, 423–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Hartmann, D., Riemann, J.F. Endoscopie et IRM: une collaboration nécessaire. Acta Endosc 32, 797–804 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03028484
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03028484