Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Greene NM. Review: uptake and elimination of local anesthetics during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1983; 62: 1013–24.
Greene NM. Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 715–30.
Wildsmith JAW, Rocco AG. Current concepts in spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth 1985; 10: 119–24.
Brown DT, Wildsmith JAW, Covino BG, Scott DB. Effect of baricity on spinal anesthesia with amethocaine. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52: 589–96.
Barker AE. Clinical experiences with spinal analgesia in 100 cases. BrMed. J. 1907; 1: 665.
Sinclair CJ, Scott DB, Edstrom HH. Effect of the Trendelenberg position on spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 497–500.
Smith TC. The lumbar spine and subarachnoid block. Anesthesiology 1968; 29: 60–4.
Wildsmith JAW, McClure JH, Brown DT, Scott DB. Effects of posture on the spread of isobaric and hyperbaric amethocaine. Br J Anaesth 1981; 53: 273–8.
McClure JH, Brown DT, Wildsmith JAW. Effect of injected volume and speed of injection on the spread of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric amethocaine. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 917–20.
McCulloch WJD, Littlewood DG. Influence of obesity on spinal analgesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58: 610–4.
Cameron AE, Arnold RW, Ghoris MW, Jamieson V. Spinal analgesia using bupivacaine 0.5% plain. Variations in the extent of block with patient age. Anaesthesia 1987; 36: 318–22.
Pitkanen M, Haapaniemi L, Touminen M, Rosenberg PH. Influence of age on spinal anaesthesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56: 279–84.
Axelsson KH, Edstrom HH, Widman GB. Spinal anaesthesia with glucose free 0.5% bupivacaine — effects of different volumes. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56: 271–8.
Chambers WA, Littlewood DB, Edstrom HH, Scott DB. Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine: effects of concentration and volume administered. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 75–80.
Axelsson KH, Edstrom HH, Widman GB. Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine — effects of volume. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1982; 26: 439–45.
Sundries KO, Vagenes P, Skretting P, Lind P, Edstrom HH. Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Effects of volume of solution. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 69–74.
Chambers WA, Littlewood DG, Logan MR, Scott DB. Effect of added epinephrine on spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1981; 60: 417–20.
Cummings GC, Bambes DB, Edstrom HH, Rubin AP. Subarachnoid blockade with bupivacaine. A comparison with cinchocaine. Brit J Anaesth 1984; 56: 573–9.
McKeown DW, Stewart K, LittlewoodDG, Wildsmith JAW. Spinal anesthesia with plain solutions of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5%. Reg Anesth 1986; 11: 68–71.
Marstrand T, Sorensen M, Andersen S. Spinal anaesthesia with 0.75% bupivacaine and 0.5% amethocaine in 5% glucose. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 971–5.
Moore DC. Spinal anesthesia: bupivacaine compared with tetracaine. Anesth Analg 1980; 59: 743–50.
Skretting P, Vaagenes P, Sundries KO, Edstrom HH, Lind B. Subarachnoid anaesthesia: comparison of hyperbaric solutions of bupivacaine and amethocaine. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56: 155–9.
Chambers WA. Editorial: intrathecal bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 799–801.
Chambers WA, Littlewood DG, Scott DB. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine: effect of added vasoconstrictors. Anesth Analg 1982; 61: 49–52.
Armstrong IR, Littlewood DG, Chambers WA. Spinal anesthesia with tetracaine — effect of added vasoconstrictors. Anesth Analg 1983; 62: 793–5.
Rocco AG, Concepcion MA, Sheskey MC, Murray E, Edstrom HH, Covino BG. A double-blind evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine without glucose and a standard solution of hyperbaric tetracaine. Reg Anesth 1984; 9: 1–7.
Logan MR, McClure JH, Wildsmith JAW. Plain bupivacaine — an unpredictable spinal anaesthetic agent. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58: 292–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wildsmith, J.A.W. Spinal anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 35 (Suppl 1), S39–S41 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026925
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026925