Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Information science, computers and medical decisions

Informatique, ordinateurs et décisions médicales

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Summary

The electronic digital computer is one of the great advances of the twentieth century, and has been studied intensively in the context of medical decision making. This presentation discusses the medical decision making process, describes the potential limitations of the computer, sets out the results of current work and (finally) discusses current philosophical questions such as the computers role, where is should obtain its data, and which doctors (if any) are likely to need such an aid to decision-making. It is argued on the basis of current evidence that the computer has a substantial role in medical decision making ; as a stimu-lous to good practice and as a teaching companion - though not as a substitute for the clinician.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Dombal F.T. — Some observations of the procedures used in medical diagnosis is real-life situations and under artificial simulated conditions. In Lange HJ., Wagner G. (eds). Computerunterstutzte arzliche Diagnostic. Stuttgard, Schattauer Berlag, 1973.

  2. leaper DJ., gill P.W., staniland J.R.et al. Clinical diagnostic process: An analysis.Br. Med. J., 1973,3,569.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. TAYLOR T.R. - Computers in medicine in the decade of the 1970’s.Scot. Med. J. 1970,15, 353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McAdam W.A.F., Horrocks J.C., De Dombal F.T. — In preparation.

  5. GILL P.W., LEAPER D.J., GUILLOU P.J. et al. Observer variation in clinical diagnosis. A computer-aided assessment of its magnitude and importance in 552 patients with abdominal pain.Methods Inf. Med., 1973,12, 108.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weed L.L. — Medical Records, Medical Education and Patient Care. Chicago Year Book, 1969.

  7. DIXON R.H., LASZLO J. - Utilization of clinical chemistry services by medical house staff.Arch. Intern. Med., 1974,134, 1064.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DURBRIDGE T.C., EDWARDS F., EDWARDS R.G., ATKINSON M. - Evaluation of benefits of screening tests done immediately on admission to hospital.Clin. Chem., 1976,22, 968.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DE DOMBAL F.T. - Diagnosis, decision-making and acute appendicitis: How many « errors » are inevitable ?Chirurg., 1979,50, 5, 291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DE DOMBAL F.T. - Picking the best test in acute abdominal pain.J. Roy. Coll. Phy., London, 1979,13, 4, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DE DOMBAL F.T., LEAPER D.G., STANILAND J.R.et al. - Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.Br. Med. J., 1972,2, 9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McADAM D.B. - A study in General Practice of the symptoms and delay patterns in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer.J. Roy. Coll. of Gen. Pract., 1979,29, 723.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LUCAS R.W., CARD W.K., KNILL-JONES R.P.et al. - Computer interrogation of patients.Br. Med. J., 1976,2, 623.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DE DOMBAL F.T. - Computer-assisted diagnosis. In Whitby L., Lutz W. (eds). Principles and practice of Medical Computing. Edinburgh, Churchill-Livingstone, 1971, 179.

    Google Scholar 

  15. gunn A.A.- The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain with computer analysis.J. Roy. Coll. Surg. Edin., 1976,21, 170.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McAdam W.A.F. — Report to U.K. Department of Health & Social Security, 1978.

  17. Boom R.A. — Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain and jaundice in Mexico City. Data presented to « Medinfo 80 », Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 1980.

  18. STANILAND J.R., CLAMP S.E., DE DOMBAL F. T.et al. - Presentation and diagnosis of patients with acute abdominal pain. Comparisons be ween Leeds, U.K. and Akershus County, Norway.Annales Chir. et Gynae., 1980,69, 6, 245.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. MORGAN A.G., DAVENPOPT P., and DARNBO-ROUGH A. - Can the preliminary screening of patients with dyspepsia allow better use of investigational resources ?Gut., 1983,24, 10, A980.

    Google Scholar 

  20. DE DOMBAL F.T., WENHAM J.S., BROWN J.M.et al. - Detection of gastrointestinal cancer in community centres by clinician, nurse, occult bloods and computer analysis.Gut., 1983,24, 10, A1009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MORGAN A.G., McADAM W.A.F., WALMSLEY G.L.et al. - Clinical findings, early endoscopy and multiva-riate analysis in patients bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract.Br. Med. J., 1977,2, 237.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DE DOMBAL F.T., MORGAN A.G., STANILAND J.R., OHMANN C. - Human and computer-aided analysis of the presentation of patients with upper gastro-intestinal bleeding. In Dykes P.E., Keighley M.R.B. (eds). Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage, John Wright: Bristol, 1981, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morgan A.G., Clamp S.E. — O.M.G.E. International Upper Gastro-intestinal Bleeding Survey, 1978–1982.Stand. J. Gastroent. In Press.

  24. LEAPER D.J., HORROCKS J.C., STANILAND J.R., DE DOMBAL F.T. -Computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain using clinicians estimates of probability.Br. Med. J., 1972,4, 350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huyghe P. — The Electronic Doctor. Science Digest, April 1983.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

De Dombal, F.T. Information science, computers and medical decisions. Acta Endosc 14, 201–210 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966035

Key-words

Mots-clés

Navigation