Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ce qu’un chirurgien doit pouvoir lire dans un protocole de pathologie gastro-intestinale de qualité

What the surgeon needs to read in a quality gastrointestinal pathology report

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. DUKES C. — The classification of cancer of the rectum.J Pathol Bacteriol, 1932,35, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DENOIX P.F. — French Ministry of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene.Monograph N o 4, Paris, 1954.

  3. BEAHRS O.H., MYERS M.D. — American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ZINKIN L.D. — A critical review of the classification and staging of colorectal cancer.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1983,26, 37–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. FIELDING L.P., ARSENAULT P.A., CHAPUIS P.H., DENT O., GATRIGHT B., HARDCASTLE J.G., HERMANEK P., JASS J.R., NEWLAND R.C. — Working party report to the world congresses of gastroenterology, Sydney 1990. Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1991,6, 325–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 4th ed., 2nd revision. Hermanek P., Sobin L.H. (eds) Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. TNM supplement 1993. A commentary on uniform use. Hermanek P, Henson D.E., Hutter R.V.P., Sobin L.H. (eds) Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BRODSKY J.T., RICHARD G.K., COHEN A.M., MINSKY B.D. — Variables correlated with the risk of lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer.Cancer, 1992,69, 322–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. MINSKY B.D., RICH T., RECHT A., HARVEY W., MIES C. — Selection criteria for local excision with or without adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.Cancer, 1989,63, 1421–1429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. COHEN A.M., WOOD W.C., GUNDERSON L.L., SHINNAR M. — Pathological studies in rectal cancer.Cancer, 1980,45, 2965–2968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DEVEREAUX D.F., DECKER P.J. — Contribution of pathological margins and Duke’s stage to local recurrence in colorectal carcinoma.Am J Surg, 1985,149, 323–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ZENG Z., COHEN A.M., HAJDA S., STERNBERG S.S., SIGURDSON E.R., ENKER W. — Serosal cytologic study to determine free mesothelial penetration by intraperitoneal colon cancer.Cancer, 1992, 70, 737–740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. TALBOT I.C., RITCHIE S., LEIGHTON M., HUGHES A.O., BUSSEY H.J.R., MORSON B.C. — Invasion of veins by carcinoma of rectum: method of detection, histological features and significance.Histopathology, 1981,5, 141–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. FENOGLIO-PREISER C.M., PASCAL R.R., PERZIN K.H. — Tumors of the large and small intestine, AFIP Fascicle, 2nd series, 1990.

  15. BELL S.M., SCOTT N., CROSS D., SAGAR P., LEWIS F.A., BLAIR G.E., TAYLOR G.R., DIXON M.F., QUIRKE P. — Prognostic value of p53 overexpression and c-ki-ras gene mutations in colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology, 1993,104, 57–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. LANGLOIS N.E.I., LAMB J., EREMIN O., HEYS S.D. — Apoptosis, p53 expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol, 1995,21, 701–702.

    Google Scholar 

  17. KERN S.E., FEARON E.R., TERSMETTE K.W.F., ENTERLINE J.P., LEPPERT M., NAKAMURA Y., WHITE R., VOGELSTEIN B., HAMILTON S.R. — Allelic loss in colorectal carcinoma.JAMA, 1989,261, 3099–3103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. HAMILTON S.R. — Molecular genetic alterations as potential prognostic indicators in colorectal carcinoma.Cancer, 1992,69S, 1589–1591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. LAURENT-PUIG P., OLSCHWANT S., DELATTRE O., REMVIKOS Y., ASSELAIN B., MELOT T., VALIDIRE P., MULERIS M., GIRODET J., SALMON R.J., THOMAS G. — Survival and acquired genetic alterations in colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology, 1992,102, 1136–1141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. HALLING K.C., GOMEZ T., SCHAID D.J., O’CORMELL M.J. CUNNINGHAM J., KOVACH J.S., CARPENTER H., AHLQUIST D., THIBODEAU S.N. — Clinical significance of molecular genetic markers in colorectal cancer.Am J Hum Genet, 1992,51, A60.

  21. AHLQUIST D.A., THIBODEAU S.N. — Will molecular genetic markers help predict the clinical behavior of colorectal neoplasia?Gastroenterology, 1992,102, 1419–1421.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DREW P.J., BOTTACI L., FAROUK R., LEE P.W.R., MACINTYRE IMC, MONSON J.R.T., DUTHIE G. S. — The application of neural networks to prognostication in colorectal cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol, 1995,21, 701.

    Google Scholar 

  23. BONENKAMP J.J., BUNT A.M.G., VAN DE VELDE C.J.H., SASAKO M., BOON M.C. — Radical lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. A prospective randomized trial in the Netherlands.Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 1993,2, 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  24. BOREHAM P. — Implantation metastases from cancer of the large bowel. Br. J. Surg. 1958,46, 103–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. LINDEMANN F., SCHLIMOK G., DIRSCHEDL P., WITTE J., RIETHMULLER G. — Prognostic significance of micrometastatic tumour cells in bone marrow of colorectal cancer patients.Lancet, 1992,340, 685–689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

F., P. Ce qu’un chirurgien doit pouvoir lire dans un protocole de pathologie gastro-intestinale de qualité. Acta Endosc 26, 79–84 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02965792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02965792

Mots-clés

Key-words

Navigation