Abstract
Advances in treatment for breast cancer have improved women’s chances of surviving this disease, while giving patients more treatment options than in the past. This study examined the influence of patient involvement in decision-making on survivor quality of life. A prevalence sample of breast cancer survivors were interviewed about their involvement in decision-making about their cancer treatment and follow-up care. A series of multivariate regression analyses were then conducted to examine how involvement in decision-making about cancer treatment and follow-up care contributed to survivor quality of life. Analyses revealed involvement in decision-making about the use of testing for recurrent disease (TFR) as part of follow-up care is associated with improved quality of life in several domains (p<0.05). This association of improved quality of life with involvement in decision-making about follow-up TFR was independent of associations of quality of life with surgical treatment received, involvement in decision-making about surgical treatment, frequency of TFR, use of mammography, age, income, education, and years since diagnosis. This suggests that efforts to increase patient involvement in decision-making about follow-up care may improve quality of lifeffor breast cancer survivors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Serrazin D, Dewar JA, Arrigada R: Conservative management of breast cancer.British Journal of Surgery. 1986,73:604–606.
Veronesi U, Zucall R, Luini A: Local control and survival in early breast cancer: The Milan Trial.International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 1986,12:717–720.
Kiebert GM, de-Haes JC, van-de-Velde CJ: The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: A review.Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1991,9:1059–1070.
Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M: Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.British Medical Journal. 1990,301:575–580.
Ganz PA, Schag AC, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML, Tan SJ: Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?Cancer. 1992,69:1729–1738.
Hall A, Fallowfield L: Psychological outcome of treatment for early breast cancer: A review.Stress Medicine. 1989,5:167–175.
Levy SM, Haynes LT, Herberman RB, et al: Mastectomy versus breast conservation surgery: Mental health effects at long-term follow-up.Health Psychology. 1992,11:349–354.
Ganz PA: Treatment options for breast cancer—Beyond survival [editorial; comment].New England Journal of Medicine. 1992,326:1147–1149.
Morris J, Royle GT: Offering patients a choice of surgery for early breast cancer: A reduction in anxiety and depression in patients and their husbands.Social Science and Medicine. 1988,26:583–585.
Pozo C, Carver CS, Noriega V, et al: Effects of mastectomy versus lumpectomy on emotional adjustment to breast cancer: A prospective study of the first year postsurgery.Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1992,10:1292–1298.
The GIVIO Investigators: Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994,271:1587–1592.
Morris S, Corder AP, Taylor I: What are the benefits of routine breast cancer follow-up?Postgraduate Medicine. 1992,68:904–907.
National Cancer Institute: Breast Cancer. PDQ (Physician Data Query) [database online]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1995.
American Society of Clinical Oncology: Recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines.Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1997,15:2149–2156.
Cocconi G: Follow-up of patients with breast cancer [letter; comment].Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994,272: 1657.
Kiebert GM, Welvaart K, Kievit J: Psychological effects of routine follow-up on cancer patients after surgery.European Journal of Surgery. 1993,159:601–607.
Klaff RA: Follow-up of patients with breast cancer [letter; comment].Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994,272: 1658.
Muss HB, Tell GS, Case LD, Robertson P, Attwell BM: Perceptions of follow-up care in women with breast cancer.American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1991,14:55–59.
Ryo UY: Follow-up of patients with breast cancer [letter; comment].Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994,272:1658–1659.
Wertheimer MD: Against minimalism in breast cancer follow-up.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991,265:396–397.
Andersen BL: Surviving cancer.Cancer. 1994,74:1484–1495.
Taylor SE, Helgeson VS, Reed GM, Skokan LA: Self-generated feeling of control and adjustment to physical illness.Journal of Social Issues. 1991,47:91–109.
Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood VJ: Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984,46:489–502.
Thompson SC: Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question.Psychological Bulletin. 1981,90:89–101.
Thompson SC, Cheek PR, Graham MA: The other side of perceived control: Disadvantages and negative effects. In Spaceapan S, Oskamp S (eds),The Social Psychology of Health (Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, 1987) Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988, 69–93.
Fredette SL: Breast cancer survivors: Concerns and coping.Cancer Nursing. 1995,18(1):35–46.
Lasry JM, Margolese RG: Fear of recurrence, breast conserving surgery, and the trade-off hypothesis.Cancer. 1991,69:2111–2115.
Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, Miller DG: Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1992,84:24–30.
Stoddard AM, Lipkus I, Lane D, et al., for the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium: Characteristics of under-users of mammogram screening aged 50 to 80.Preventative Medicine. 1998,27:478–487.
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B:SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 1993.
Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer B, et al: Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991,114:657–661.
Lerman C, Lustbadder E, Rimer B, et al: Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: A randomized trial.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1995,87:286–292.
Dalberg K, Mattsson A, Rutqvist LE, et al: Breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: Risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences.Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 1997,43:73–86.
Demicheli R, Abbattista A, Miceli R, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G: Time distribution of the recurrence risk for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy: Further support about the concept of tumor dormancy.Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 1996,41:177–185.
McCaul KD, Branstetter AD, Schroeder DM, Glasgow RE: What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review.Health Psychology. 1996,15:423–429.
Leventhal H, Cameron L: Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance.Patient Education and Counseling. 1987,10:117–138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by grant 3 R01 CA 60131-03S1 from U.S. Public Health Service, Office of Women’s Health as part of the National Action Plan on Breast Cancer initiative and by grant CA 63146 from the National Cancer Institute.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Erin Ellis, Dr. Ben Anderson, Dr. Julie Gralow, and Susan Wilson, M.P.H., for their comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, M.R., Urban, N. Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life. ann. behav. med. 21, 201–209 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02884834
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02884834