Abstract
This study examined the relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. We hypothesized that larger social networks, higher levels of support from networks, and stronger social influences to undergo screening would be positively associated with regular utilization of mammograms and clinical breast examinations. Data were collected from women aged 52 and over who were employed in 27 worksites (N=1,045). Social network characteristics, breast cancer screening practices, and sociodemographic factors were assessed in a self-administered survey. Bivariate analyses revealed that social influences were significantly associated with regular screening; social support was only marginally associated with regular screening; and social network size was not at all associated. In multivariate analyses, only the perception that screening is normative among one’s peers was predictive of regular screening. Provider recommendation was the single most potent predictor of regular screening. These findings provide support for the importance of social norms in motivating women to adhere to screening guidelines. In addition, they underscore the potent impact of provider recommendations on women’s screening practices.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
American Cancer Society:Cancer Facts and Figures-1998. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1998.
Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL: Efficacy of screening mammography.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995,273:149–154.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force:Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of 169 Interventions. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
National Cancer Institute: NCI adopts new mammography screening guidelines for women.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1997,89:538–540.
Anderson LM, May DS: Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States?American Journal of Public Health. 1995,85:840–842.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: State and sex-specific prevalence of selected characteristics—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1994 and 1995.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1997,46(SS03):1–29.
Rimer BK: Understanding the acceptance of mammography by women.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1992,14:197–203.
Calle EE, Miracle-McMahill HL, Moss RE, Health CW: Personal contact from friends to increase mammography usage.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1994,10:361–366.
Clover K, Redman S, Forbes J, Sanson-Fisher R, Callaghan T: Two sequential randomized trials of community participation to recruit women for mammographic screening.Preventive Medicine. 1996,25:126–134.
Davis DT, Bustamante A, Brown CP, et al: The urban church and cancer control: A source of social influence in minority communities.Public Health Reports. 1994,109:500–506.
Earp JL, Altpeter M, Mayne L, Viadro CI, O’Malley MS: The North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program: Foundations and design of a model for reaching older, minority, rural women.Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 1995,35:7–22.
Eng E: The Save Our Sisters Project: A social network strategy for reaching rural Black women.Cancer. 1993,72:1071–1077.
Eng E, Smith J: Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education.Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 1995,35:23–29.
List MA, Lacey L, Hopkins E, Burton D: The involvement of low literate elderly women in the development and distribution of cancer screening materials.Journal of Family and Community Health. 1994,17:42–55.
Morisky DE, Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA: The role of needs assessment in designing a community-based mammography education program for urban women.Health Education Research. 1989,4:469–478.
Suarez L, Nichols DC, Brady CA: Use of peer role models to increase Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American and Black women.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1993,9:290–296.
Sung JF, Coates RJ, Williams JE, et al: Cancer screening intervention among Black women in inner-city Atlanta—Design of a study.Public Health Reports. 1992,107:381–388.
Urban N, Taplin SH, Taylor VM, et al: Community organization to promote breast cancer screening among women ages 50–75.Preventive Medicine. 1995,24:477–484.
Rimer BK: Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of interventions.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,16:317–326.
Montano DE, Taplin SH: A test of an expanded Theory of Reasoned Action to predict mammography participation.Social Sciences in Medicine. 1991,32:733–741.
Brown RL, Baumann LJ, Helberg CP, et al: The simultaneous analysis of patient, physician, and group practice influences on annual mammography performance.Social Science in Medicine. 1996,43:315–324.
Calnan M: Patterns in preventive behavior: A study of women in middle age.Social Science in Medicine. 1985,20:263–268.
Kang SH, Bloom JR: Social support and cancer screening among older Black Americans.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993,85:737–742.
Kang SH, Bloom JR, Romano PS: Cancer screening among African-American women: Their use of tests and social support.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:101–103.
Kruse J, Phillips DM: Factors influencing women’s decision to undergo mammography.Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1987,70:744–748.
Suarez L, Lloyd L, Weiss N, Rainbolt T, Pulley L: Effect of social networks on cancer-screening behavior of older Mexican-American women.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994,86:775–779.
Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G: Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1994,48:65–73.
Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, Greene HL: Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors.American Journal of Public Health. 1989,79:1499–1502.
Glanz K, Resch N, Lerman C, et al: Factors associated with adherence to breast cancer screening among working women.Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1992,34:1071–1078.
Champion V: Relationship of age to mammography compliance.Cancer. 1994,74:329–335.
Rimer BK, Trock B, Engstrom PF: Why do some women get regular mammograms?American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1991,7:69–74.
King E, Rimer BK, Balshem A, Ross E, Seay J: Mammography-related beliefs among older women.Journal of Aging and Health. 1993,5:82–100.
Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstron PF: Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.Preventive Medicine. 1990,19:279–290.
Champion VL: Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening.Cancer Detection and Prevention. 1992,16:253–258.
Bureau of the Census: We the American women. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993.
Berkman LF, Syme SL: Social networks host resistance and mortality: A nine-year follow-up of Alameda County residents.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1979,109:186–204.
Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, DeGruy FV, Kaplan BH: Functional versus structural social support and health care utilization in a family medicine outpatient practice.Medical Care. 1989,27:221–233.
House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D: Social relationships and health.Science. 1988,241:540–544.
Seeman TE, Syme SL: Social networks and coronary artery disease: A comparison of the structure and function of social relations as predictors of disease.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1987,49:341–354.
Berkman LF: The role of social relations in health promotion.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57:245–254.
Thoits PA: Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next?Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1995,Extra Issue:53–79.
Cohen S, Wills TA: Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin. 1985,98:310–357.
Cohen S, Syme LS (eds):Social Support and Health. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1985.
Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1986.
Perry CL, Baranowski T, Parcel GS: How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: Social Learning Theory. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990, 161–186.
Azjen I, Fishbein M:Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
Carter WB: Health behavior as a rational process: Theory of Reasoned Action and Multiattribute Utility Theory. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990, 63–91.
Janz NK, Becker MH: The Health Belief Model: A decade later.Health Education Quarterly. 1984,11:1–47.
Rosenstock I: The Health Belief Model: Explaining health behavior through expectancies. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990, 39–62.
Bastani R, Marcus AC, Hollatz-Brown A: Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: A Los Angeles county survey.Preventive Medicine. 1991,20:350–363.
Breen N, Kessler L: Changes in the use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Survey.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:62–67.
Centers for Disease Control: Use of mammography—United States.Morbitity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1990,39:621–630.
Champion VL: The relationship of selected variables to breast cancer detection behaviors in women 35 and older.Oncology Nursing Forum. 1991,18:733–739.
Israel BA: Social networks and health status: Linking theory, research, and practice.Patient counseling and Health Education. 1982,4:65–79.
Israel BA, Schurman SJ: Social support, control, and the stress process. In Glanz K, Marcus-Lewis F, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990, 187–215.
Rimer BK, Kasper Keintz M, Kessler HR, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR: Why women resist mammography: Patient-related barriers.Radiology. 1989,172:243–246.
Fletcher SW: Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations?New England Journal of Medicine. 1997,336:1180–1183.
Kaluzny AD, Rimer B, Harris R: The National Cancer Institute and guideline development: Lessons from the breast cancer screening controversy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994,86:901–902.
Baines CJ: Breast self-examination.Cancer. 1989,64:2661–2663.
O’Malley MS, Fletcher SW: Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987,16:2196–2203.
National Cancer Institute: Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportunity.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1990,264:54–58.
Seeman TE, Berkman LF, Blazer D, Rowe JW: Social ties and support and neuroendocrine function: The MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,16:95–106.
Murray DM:Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, 241.
Allen JD, Sorensen G, Stoddard AM, Colditz G, Peterson K: Intention to have a mammogram in the future among women who have underused mammography in the past.Health Education and Behavior. 1998,25:474–488.
Fox SA, Stein JA: The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups.Medical Care. 1991,29:1065–1082.
Horton JA, Romans MC, Cruess DF: Mammography Attitudes and Usage Study.Women’s Health Issues. 1992,2:180–186.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census:1990 Census of Population and Housing: Summary of Social, Economic and Housing Characteristics. 1990.
Etzi S, Lane DS, Grimson R: The use of mammography vans by low-income women: The accuracy of self-reports.American Journal of Public Health. 1994,84:107–109.
Degnan D, Harris R, Ranmey J, et al: Measuring the use of mammography: Two methods compared.American Journal of Public Health. 1992,82:1386–1388.
King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P: How valid are mammography self-reports?American Journal of Public Health. 1990,80:1386–1388.
Zapka JG, Bigelow C, Hurley T, et al: Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: The accuracy of self-report.American Journal of Public Health. 1996,86:1016–1021.
Fowler FJ:Survey Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, 1988.
Suarez L, Nichols DC, Brady CA: Use of peer role models to increase Pap smear and mammography screening in Mexican-American and Black women.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1993,9:290–296.
Sung JC, Blumenthal DS, Coates RJ, et al: Effect of a cancer screening intervention conducted by lay health workers among inner-city women.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1997,13:51–57.
Eng E, Young R: Lay health advisors as community change agents.Journal of Family and Community Health. 1992,15:24–40.
Ramirez AG, McAlister AL: Mass media campaign—A Su Salud.Preventive Medicine. 1988,17:608–621.
Bird JA, McPhee SJ, Jenkins C, Fordham D: Three strategies to promote cancer screening.Medical Care. 1990,28:1005–1012.
Garr DR, Ornstein SM, Jenkins RG, Zemp LD: The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1993,9:55–61.
Harris RP, O’Malley MS, Fletcher SW, Knight BP: Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: A five-year study of manual and computer reminders.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1990,6:145–152.
Rimer BK, Ross E, Balshem A, Engstrom PF: The effect of a comprehensive breast screening program on self-reported mammography use by primary care physicians and women in a Health Maintenance Organization.Journal of the American Board of Family Practitioners. 1993,6:443–451.
Snell JL, Buck EL: Increasing cancer screening: A meta-analysis.Preventive Medicine. 1996,25:702–707.
Trock B, Rimer BK, King E, et al: Impact of an HMO-based intervention to increase mammography utilization.Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 1993,2:151–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute, grant number RO1 CA66038.
The authors are indebted to the other investigators and staff who participated in this project, including Judy Garber, Elizabeth Harden, Sonia Hauser, Mary K. Hunt, Ruth Lederman, Nancy Lightman, Sharon Longo, Jeb Mays, Steve Potter, Natania Remba, and Jane Weeks. In addition, we are grateful to the Service Employees International Union and the 27 worksites participating in this study.
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, J.D., Sorensen, G., Stoddard, A.M. et al. The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. ann. behav. med. 21, 193–200 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02884833
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02884833