Abstract
The Dutch take pride in their policy on housing and the development of urban land. After the Second World War, the Housing Act—dating from 1901—was elaborated into specific rules for physical planning and a system of subsidizing the production and management of a large number of social rented dwellings. The effectiveness of the Dutch approach was based upon the synergy of state interventions in physical planning, housing and land policy.
This article analyses the performance of this system in two respects. Firstly, it looks at how the system affected the influence of prices of virgin land and of land development costs on decisions in physical planning, and what effect it had on prices of serviced land for social housing. This section is based on an analysis of Dutch land policy and the resulting land prices for housing over the entire post-war period. Secondly, this article considers what the Dutch system contributed to social integration in Dutch cities, and whether it gave lower—income groups access to locations with better quality than the free market would have offered. This second part of the study is based on empirical data on the socio-spatial development of The Hague and its region.
Regarding the existing English literature on the successes of Dutch policy, the author suggests a more carefully balanced appraisal. This leads to some points for a research agenda for land policy in the Netherlands, given the rapid shift to marketled production in Dutch housing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Badcock, B. (1994) “The Strategic Implications for the Randstad of the Dutch Property System”,Urban Studies (31), no. 3, pp. 425–455.
Faludi, A., and A.J. van der Valk (1990)De groeikernen als hoeksteen van de Nederlandse ruimtelijke planningdoctrine [Growth Centres as Cornerstone of Dutch Physical Planning Doctrine], Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Galle, M., and E. Modderman (1997) “VINEX: National spatial planning policy in the Netherlands during the nineties”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (12), no. 1, pp. 9–35.
Hallett G. (ed.) (1988)Land and Housing Policies in Europe and the USA: A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge.
Janssen, M.C.W., (1996) “The price of land and the process of expropriation: a game theoretic analysis of the Dutch situation”,The Economist (144), no. 1, pp. 63–77.
Kam, G. de (1996)Op grond van beleid—locaties voor sociale woningbouw, grondbeleid en ruimtelijke spreiding van welstand in en rond Den Haag [Policy-made land: sites for social housing, land policy and spatial distribution of prosperity in and around The Hague], Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Almere: Nationale Woningraad.
Keogh, G. (1994) “Land law and urban planning in Spain: an economic perspective”,European Planning Studies (2), no. 4, pp. 485–497.
Needham, B. (1988) “The Netherlands”, in Hallett, G. (ed.),Land and Housing Policies in Europe and the USA: A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 49–75.
Needham, B. (1992) “A theory of land prices when land is supplied publicly: the case of the Netherlands”,Urban Studies (29), no. 5, pp. 669–686.
Needham, B., P. Koenders, and B. Kruijt (1993)Urban Land and Property Markets in the Netherlands, London: UCL Press.
Needham, B. (1997) “Land policy in the Netherlands”,Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (88), no. 3, pp. 291–296.
OECD (1992)Urban Land Markets—Policies for the 1990s, Paris: OECD.
Priemus, H. (1997) “Spatial planning and housing policy: On the ties that bind”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (12), no. 1, pp. 77–90.
Rodriquez-Bachiller, A., M. Thomas, and S. Walker “The English planning lottery: some insights from a more regulated system”,Town Planning Review (63), no. 4, pp. 387–402.
Sluijs, F. van der (1989)Haagse stedebouw; mijn ervaringen in de jaren 1946–1983 [Town planning in The Hague; my experiences in the years 1946–1983], Utrecht: Stichting Matrijs.
TauwMabeg (1998)De grondprijzen voor woningbouw in Nederland 1990–1996 [Land prices for housing in the Netherlands' 1990–1996], Utrecht: TauwMabeg civiel en bouw bv.
Verhage, R. (1998) Wie betaalt de woonomgeving na de VINEX? [Who will pay for the built environment after VINEX?],Stedebouw & Ruimtelijke Ordening, no. 4, pp. 19–48.
VROM (1997)Housing in the Netherlands. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Kam, G. Value for money: Quality and price of land for social housing in the Netherlands. Neth J of Housing and the Built Environment 13, 453–475 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497029
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497029