Summary
In experiments at a temperate (43oN) and a tropical (14oN) location, closer plant spacing decreased stem branching, root growth, and mean tuber size but increased tuber yields per ha. Closer spacing increased plant height at the temperate site but decreased it at the tropical site where canopy cover did not reach 100%. The increased branching at the wider spacing did not compensate for fewer plants/m2. Total and tuber weight per plant increased with wider spacing and was much greater under temperate than tropical conditions. Tuber yield/stem also increased with lower stem densities. Although these results provide initial data for modelling, the contrast between the two environments and interactions between spacing and cultivar suggest that further experiments need to be done with a range of cultivars at intermediate locations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, E. J., 1978. Plant density. In: P. M. Harris (Ed.), The potato crop, the scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London. p. 278–326.
Allen, E. J., 1979. Effects of cutting seed tubers on number of stems and tubers and tuber yields of several potato varieties.Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 121–128.
Bremner, P. M. & M. A. Taha, 1966. Studies in potato agronomy. I. The effects of variety, seed size and spacing on growth, development and yield.Journal of Agricultural Science 66: 241–252.
Demagante, A. L. & P. Vander Zaag, 1988a. The response of potato (Solanum spp.) to photoperiod and light intensity under high temperature.Potato Research 31: 73–83.
Demagante, A. L. & P. Vander Zaag, 1988b. Potato (Solanum spp.) in an isohyperthermic environment. II. Response to planting date.Field Crops Research 19: 153–166.
Ewing, E. E., W. D. Heym, E. J. Batutis, R. G. Snyder, M. Ben Khedher, K. P. Sandlan & A. D. Turner, 1989. Modifications to the simulation model, POTATO, for use in New York.Agricultural Systems (Accepted for publication).
Ifwenke, O. P. & E. J. Allen, 1978. Effects of row width and planting density on growth and yield of two main crop potato varieties. I. Plant morphology and dry matter accumulation.Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91: 265–278.
Manrique, L. A., D. P. Bartholomew & E. E. Ewing, 1989. Growth and yield performance of several potato clones grown at three elevations in Hawaii. I. Plant morphology.Crop Science 29: 363–370.
Ng, E. & R. S. Loomis, 1984. Simulation of growth and yield of the potato crop. Pudoc, Wageningen. (Simulation monographs) 147 pp.
Sieczka, J. B., E. E. Ewing & E. D. Markwardt, 1986. Potato planter performance and effects on non-uniform spacing.American Potato Journal 63: 25–37.
Vander Zaag, P. & A. L. Demagante, 1987. Potato (Solanum spp.) in an isohyperthermic environment. I. Agronomic management.Field Crops Research 17: 199–217.
Van Loon, C. D., 1981. The effect of water stress on potato growth, development and yield.American Potato Journal 58: 51–69.
Vos, J., 1986. Research on water relations and stomatal conductance in potatoes. I. An introduction to concepts, techniques and procedures. In: Potato research of tomorrow. Pudoc, Wageningen, p. 17–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vander Zaag, P., Demagante, A.L. & Ewing, E.E. Influence of plant spacing on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) morphology, growth and yield under two contrasting environments. Potato Res 33, 313–323 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359305
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359305