Abstract
Two studies were conducted to examine some factors that may motivate support of or opposition to affirmative action programs for women. In the first study, a sample of 96 French-speaking male managers and professionals were presented with one of three versions of an affirmative action program to benefit women in blue-collar jobs. The men were asked about their endorsements and beliefs about the program described to them and (using a neosexism scale) about sex equity. Results indicate that neosexist attitudes influence support of the program presented, and articulating adherence to a merit principle in affirmative action influences perceptions of fairness. The second study evaluated reactions to an affirmative action program targeting jobs similar to those of the participants. Four conditions were designed to determine which element or combinations of elements of information presented in the first merit condition might have a stronger impact on fairness evaluations. A total of 131 francophone male managers and professionals participated in this study. Results reveal that neosexist attitudes influence level of support for the program. Both neosexism and the four conditions had an impact on evaluations of fairness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ayers, L. R. (1992). Perceptions of affirmative action among its beneficiaries.Soc. Justice Res. 5: 223–238.
Clayton, S., and Crosby, F. (1992).Justice, Gender and Affirmative Action, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Clayton, S., and Tangri, S. S. (1989). The justice of affirmative action. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 177–192.
Crosby, F. (in press). Understanding affirmative action.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol.
Crosby, F., and Blanchard, F. (1989). Introduction: Affirmative action and the question of standards. In Blanchard, F. A. and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 3–8.
Crosby, F., Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., and Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the failure to perceive discrimination.Sex Roles, 14: 637–646.
Dovidio, J. F., Mann, J., and Gaertner, S. L. (1989). Resistance to affirmative action: The implications of aversive racism. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 83–102.
Ezorsky, G. (1991).Racism and Justice: The Case for Affirmative Action, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.),Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 61–89.
Goldsmith, N., Cordova, D., Dwyer, K., Langlois, B., and Crosby, F. (1989). Reactions to affirmative action: A case study. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.)Affirmative Action in Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 139–146.
Heilman, M. E. (in press). Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, Greenwich, JAI, CT.
Heilman, M. E., and Herlihy, J. M. (1984). Affirmative action, negative reaction? Some moderating conditions.Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 33: 204–213.
Jacobson, C. K. (1985). Resistance to affirmative action: Self-interest or racism?J. Conflict Resolution 29: 306–329.
Jencks, C. (1985). Affirmative action for Blacks.Am. Behav. Sci. 28: 731–760.
Jones, A. J. Jr. (1991).Affirmative Action, Affirmative Talk, Praeger, New York.
Kahn, W., and Crosby, F. (1985). Discriminating between attitudes and discriminatory behavior: Change and stasis. In Larwood, L., Gutek, B. A., and Stromberg, A. H. (eds.),Women and Work, An Annual Review, Vol. 1, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 215–238.
Kinder, D. R. (1986). The continuing American dilemma: White resistance to racial change 40 years after Myrdal.J. Social Issues 42(2): 151–171.
Lerner, M. J. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
Lipset, S. M., and Schneider, W. (1978). The Bakke case: How would it be decided at the bar of public opinion?Public Opinion 42, pp. 38–44.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.),Prejudice, discrimination and racism, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 91–125.
Noble, A., and Winett, R. A. (1978). Chairpersons' and hires' opinion, knowledge, and experience with affirmative action guidelines.J. Commun. Psychol. 6: 194–199.
Opotow, S. (1992). Affirmative action and social justice: Introduction.Soc. Justice Res. 5: 219–222.
Ponterotto, J. G., Martinez, F. M., and Hayden, D. C. (1986). Student affirmative action programs: A help or hindrance to development of graduate students.J. Coll Student Personnel, July, pp. 318–325.
Smith, C. R., and Crosby, F. (in press). Affirmative action: Setting the record straight.Soc. Justice Res.
Sowell, T. (1990).Preferential Policies: An International Perspective, W. Morrow, New York.
Steele, S. (1990).The Content of Our Character: A New Vision of Race in America, St. Martin Press, New York.
Steele, S. (1992). The new sovereignty.Harper's Magazine July, pp. 47–54.
Tougas, F., and Beaton, A. M. (1993). Affirmative action in the work place: For better or for worse.J. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 42: 253–264.
Tougas, F., and Veilleux, F. (1989). Male acceptance of affirmative action programs for women: The result of altruistic or egoistical motives?Int. J. Psychol. 24: 485–496.
Tougas, F., and Veilleux, F. (1990). The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model.Can. J. Behav. Sci. 22: 424–432.
Tougas, F., and Veilleux, F. (1991). Les réactions des hommes à l'action positive: une question d'intérét personnel ou d'insatisfaction face aux iniquités de sexe?Rev. Can. Sci. Admin. 8: 37–42.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., and Joly, S. (in press). Neosexism: Plus a change plus c'est pareil.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.
Twiss, C., Tabb, S., and Crosby, F. J. (1989). Affirmative action and aggregate data: The importance of patterns in the perception of discrimination. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 159–167.
Tyler, T. R. (1990).Why People Obey the Law? Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Ward, D. (1985). Generations and the expression of symbolic racism.Polit. Psychol. 6: 1–18.
Williams, P. J. (1991).The Alchemy of Race and Rights, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tougas, F., Crosby, F., Joly, S. et al. Men's attitudes toward affirmative action: Justice and intergroup relations at the crossroads. Soc Just Res 8, 57–71 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334826
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334826