Summary
It is commonly recognised that many evolutionary changes of amino acid sequence in proteins are conservative: a substitution of one amino acid residue for another has a far greater chance of being accepted if the two residues are similar in properties. Here we investigate what properties are most important in determining the similarity of two amino acids, from the evolutionary point of view. Our results confirm earlier observations that the hydrophobicity and the molecular bulk of the side chain tend to be conserved. More importantly they also show that evolutionary pressures favour the conservation of secondary structure, and that all these properties can be arranged in a two dimensional diagram in which distances well preserve the observed substitution frequencies between amino acids. These results were obtained by a multi-dimensional scaling technique; and are independent of any prior opinions about conserved properties. Thus, it is demonstrated that all relations of importance to single amino acid substitutions can be represented by a single figure, which is much more comprehensible and useful than the usual tabular representation of substitution frequencies. Such a figure conveniently portrays the “stereochemical code” for conservative substitution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Carroll JD (1972) Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In: Shepard RN, Romney AK, Nerlove SB, Multidimensional scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioural sciences. Seminar Press, London, pp 105–155
Dayhoff MO, Eck RV, Park CM (1972) A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: Dayhoff MO (ed) Atlas of protein sequence and structure. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Georgetown University, Washington DC, pp 89–99
Dickerson KE, Geis I (1969) The structure and action of proteins. Harper and Row, New York
Guttmann L (1968) A general non-metric technique for finding the smallest co-ordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika 33:469–506
Jorre RP, Curnow RN (1975) A model for the evolution of proteins. Biochimie 57:1147–1156
Jungck JR (1978) The genetic code as a periodic table. J Mol Evol 11:211–224
Kendall DG (1971) Construction of maps from odd bits of information. Nature 231:158–159
Kruskal JB (1964) Non-metric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika 29:1–27
Levitt M (1976) A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol 104:59–107
Robson B, Suzuki E (1976) Conformational properties of amino acid residues in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 107:327–356
Shepard RN (1974) Representation of structure in similarity data: problems and prospects. Psychometrika 39:373–421
Shepard RN, Romney AK, Nerlove SB (1972) Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioural sciences. Vols I and II. Seminar Press, London
Sibson R (1972) Order in variant methods for data analysis (with discussion) J Roy Statist Soc B 34:311–349
Spence I, Graef J (1974) The determination of the underlying dimensionality of an empirically obtained matrix of proximities. Multivariate Behavioural Research 9:331–342
Taylor, W (1982) Private Communication
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
French, S., Robson, B. What is a conservative substitution?. J Mol Evol 19, 171–175 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300754
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300754