Abstract
A 16-item questionnaire concerning independence and three divergent thinking tests were administered to three groups of preadolescent boys and their mothers as part of an ongoing longitudinal investigation of exceptional giftedness. The subjects included one group of exceptionally gifted boys with IQs in excess of 150 (n=28), a second group of exceptionally gifted boys selected for their math-science abilities (also well within the 99th percentile;n=26), and a control group of gifted boys (n=37), with a mean IQ of 133). The three groups were compared with one another in terms of (a) their own independence ratings, (b) their mothers' independence ratings, (c) correlations of boys' and mothers' independence ratings, and (d) correlations of independence ratings with IQ and scores from the divergent thinking tests. Results indicated significant differences among the three groups of mothers, and significant differences between the two exceptionally gifted groups and the control group. In addition, mothers' and subjects' independence scores were moderately correlated with IQ and divergent thinking test scores. These results are discussed and placed in the context of the longitudinal project of which they are a part.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albert, R. S. (1969). The concept of genius and its implications for the study of creativity nad giftedness.Am. Psychol. 24: 743–753.
Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius.Am. Psychol. 30: 140–151.
Albert, R. S. (1980). Family position and the attainment of eminence: A study of special family positions and special family experiencesGifted Child Q. 24: 87–95.
Albert, R. S., and Runco, M. A. (1986). The achievement of eminence: A model of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In Sternberg, R. J., and Davison, J. E. (Eds.),Conceptions of Giftendness. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Albert, R. S., and Runco, M. A. (1987). The possible different personality dispositions of scietists and nonscientists. In Jackson, D. N., and Rushton, J. P. (Eds.),Scientific Excellence: Origins and Assessment. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Allen, V. L., and Levine, J. M. (1968). Creativity and conformity.J. Personal. 36: 405–419.
Aviram, A., and Milgram, R. M. (1977). Dogmatism, locus of control, and creativity in the Soviet Union, the United States, and Israel.Psychol. Rep. 40: 27–34.
Bachman, E. B. (1986). The relations between type A behavior, clinically relevant behavior, and academic achievement.J. Personal. Assess. 50: 186–192.
Barron, F. (1968).Creativity and Personal Freedom. Van Nostrand, New York.
Barron, F. (1969).Creative Person, Creative Process. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental autonomy.Develop. Psychol. Monogr. 4(1): 1–103.
Berglas, S. (1986).The Success Sydrome: Hitting Bottom When You Reach the Top, Plenum, New York.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985).Devleoping Talent in Young People. Ballantine Books, New York.
Cox, C. M. (1926).Genetic Studies of Genius: The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Crutchfield, R. S. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. In Gruber, H. E., Terrell, G., and Wertheimer, M. (Eds.),Contemporary Approaches to Creativity. Atherton, New York.
Eiduson, B. T. (1962).Scientists: Their Psychological World. Basic Books, New York.
Gardner, H. (1983).Frames of Mind. Basic Books, New York.
Hammond, A. L. (Ed.). (1984).A Passion to Know: 20 Profiles in Science. Scribners, New York.
Heckhausen, H. (1983). Concern with one's competence: Developmental shifts in personenvironment interaction. In Magnusson, D., and Allen, V. L. (Eds.),Human Development: An Interactional Perspective. Academic Press, New York.
Helson, R. (1980).Women and the Mathematical Mystique. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.
Keniston, K. (1968).Young Radicals. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
Koenigs, S. S., Fiedler, M. L., and de Charms, R. (1977). Teachers' beliefs, classroom interaction and personal consation.J. Appl. Social Psychol. 7: 95–114.
Laband, D. M., and Lentz, B. F. (1985).The Roots of Success: Why Children Follow Their Parents' Career Footsteps. Praeger, New York.
Lucito, L. F. (1964). Independence-conformity behavior as a function of intellect: Bright and dull children.Except. Child. 31: 5–13.
MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential.Am. Psychol. 20: 273–281.
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978).In Search of Human Effectiveness. Creative Education Foundation, Buffalo, NY.
Marjoribanks, K. (1979).Families and Their Learning Environments. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston, MA.
May, R. (1975).The Courage to Create. Bantam, New York.
Moustakas, C. (1967). Creativity and conformity in education. In Mooeny, R. L., and Razik, T. A. (Eds.),Explorations in Creativity. Harper & Row, New York.
Nakamura, C. Y. (1958). Conformity and problem solving.J. Abnormal Social Psychol. 56: 315–320.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.
Oden, M. (1983). A 40 year follow-up of giftedness: Fulfillment and unfulfillment. In Albert, R. S. (Ed.),Genius and Eminence. Pergamon, New York.
Poland, N. (1978, July–August). The most fascinating family in Britain.Harvard Magazine, pp. 29–32, 56–59.
Roe, A. (1953).The Making of a Scientist. Dodd, Mead, New York.
Runco, M. A. (1986). The discriminant validity of gifted children's divergent thinking test scores.Gifted Child Q. 30: 78–82.
Runco, M. A., and Albert, R. S. (1986). Exceptional giftedness and intrafamiliar divergent thinking.J. Youth Adoles. 15: 333–342.
Runco, M. A., and Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem-discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process.J. Youth Adoles. 17: 213–222.
Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., and Paunonen, S. V. (1983). Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in university professors.Scientometrics 5: 93–116.
Scarr, S., and McCarthey, K. (1983). How young people make their environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects.Child Develop. 54: 424–435.
Seginer, R. (1983). Parents' educational expectaitons and children's academic achievement.Merrill-Palmer Q. 29: 1–23.
Seginer, R. (1986). Mothers' behavior and sons' performance: An initial test of an academic achievement path model.Merrill-Palmer Q. 32: 153–166.
Simonton, D. K. (1987). Developmental antecedents of achieved eminence.Ann. Child Develop. 4: 131–169.
Stanley, J., Keating, D. P., and Fox, L. H. (Eds.). (1974).Mathematical Talents: Discovery, Description, and Development. Johns Hopkins University press, Baltimore, MD.
Tuddenham, R. D. (1959). Correlates of yielding to a distorted group norm.J. Personal. 27: 272–284.
Walberg, H. S., Rasher, S. P., and Hase, K. (1983). IQ correlated with high eminence. In Albert, R. S. (Ed.),Genius and Eminence. Pergamon, New York.
Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965).Modes of Thinking in Young Children. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.
Winnicott, D. W. (1976)The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. Hogarth, London.
Winterbottom, M. R. (1958). The relation of need for achievement to learning experiences in independence and mastery. In Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.),Motives in Fantasy, Action, and Society. Van Nostrand, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant to Dr. Albert by the Arthur D. and Catherine T. McArthur Foundation.
Received Ph.D. from Boston University His research interests include long-term family involvement in giftedness and achievement of eminence.
Received Ph.D. from the Claremont Graduate School His current interests include the psychometrics and family background of creativity and exceptionality.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albert, R.S., Runco, M.A. Independence and the creative potential of gifted and exceptionally gifted boys. J Youth Adolescence 18, 221–230 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139037
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139037