Summary
Operator metrics are explicity designed to measure evolutionary distances from nucleic acid sequences when substitution rates differ greatly among the organisms being compared, or when substitutions have been extensive. Unlike lengths calculated by the distance matrix and parsimony methods, in which substitutions in one branch of a tree can alter the measured length of another branch, lengths determined by operator metrics are not affected by substitutions outside the branch.
In the method, lengths (operator metrics) corresponding to each of the branches of an unrooted tree are calculated. The metric length of a branch reconstructs the number of (transversion) differences between sequences at a tip and a node (or between nodes) of a tree. The theory is general and is fundamentally independent of differences in substitution rates among the organisms being compared. Mathematically, the independence has been obtained becuase the metrics are eigen vectors of fundamental equations which describe the evolution of all unrooted trees.
Even under conditions when both the distance matrix method or a simple parsimony length method are show to indicate lengths than are an order of magnitude too large or too small, the operator metrics are accurate. Examples, using data calculated with evolutionary rates and branchings designed to confuse the measurement of branch lengths and to camouflage the topology of the true tree, demonstrate the validity of operator metrics. The method is robust. Operator metric distances are easy to calculated, can be extended to any number of taxa, and provide a statistical estimate of their variances.
The utility of the method is demonstrated by using it to analyze the origins and evolutionary of chloroplasts, mitochondria, and eubacteria.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brown WM, Prager EM, Wang A, Wilson AC (1982) Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution. J Mol Evol 18:225–239
Cann RL, Brown WM, Wilson AC (1984) Polymorphic sites and the mechanism of evolution in human mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 106:479–499
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AFW. (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550–570
Dickerson RE (1980) Evolution and gene transfer in purple nonsulfur photobacteria. Nature 283:210–212
Farris JS (1972) Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106:645–668
Felsenstein J (1983) Inferring evolutionary trees from DNA sequences. In: Weil BS (ed) Statistical analysis of DNA sequence data. Mrcel Dekker, New York
Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279–284
Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1968) The construction of phylogenetic trees. II. How well do they reflect past history? Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 21:217–242
Holquist R, Pearl D (1980) Theoretical foundations for quantitative phylogenetics: Part III. J Mol Evol 16:211–267
Huysmans E, DeWachter R (1986) Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 14:r73–118
Jukes TH, Cantor CH (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–123
Klotz LC, Komar N, Blanken RL, Mitchell RM (1979) Calcculation of evolutionary trees from sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:4516–4520
Lake JA (1987) A rate independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony. Mol Biol Evol 4:167–191
Li WH (1981) Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 1085–1089
Moore GW, Goodman M, Callahan C, Holmquist R, Moise H (1976) Stochasticveruss augmented maximum parsimony method for estimating superimposed mutations in the divergent evolution of protein sequences. Methods tested on cytochromec amino acid sequences. J Mol Biol 105:15–37
Nei M (1975) Molecular population gentics and evolution. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Ochman H, Wilson AC (1986) Evolutionary history of enteric bacteria. In: Ingraham et al. (eds)Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: molecular and cellular aspects. ASM Publications, Washington DC, pp 1–6
Penny D (1982) Towards a basis for classification: the incompleteness of distance measures, incompatibility analysis and phenetic classification. J Theor Biol 96:129–142
Prager EM, Wilson AC (1978) Construction of phylogenetic trees for proteins and nucleic acids: empirical evaluation of alternative matrix methods. J Mol Evol 11:129–142
Tajima F, Nei M (1984) Estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Mol Biol Evol 1(3):269–285
Templeton AR (1983) Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavages site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37:221–244
Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1962) Molecular diseiase, evolution, and genetic heterogeneity. In: Kasha M, Pullman B (eds) Horizons in biochemistry, Albert Szent-Gyorgy Dedicatory Volume. Academic Press, New York, pp 189–225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lake, J.A. Determining evolutionary distances from highly diverged nucleic acid sequences: Operator metrics. J Mol Evol 26, 59–73 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02111282
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02111282