Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the use of a fully implanted artificial anal sphincter for management of severe fecal incontinence. METHODS: An artificial anal sphincter was implanted in 12 patients who failed conventional management for severe fecal incontinence. Careful patient follow-up was recorded during a mean 58-month follow-up. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative manometric assessment. Functional and patient satisfaction evaluations were obtained by mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: Three infections and three mechanical complications occurred in four patients (33 percent). A successful outcome was achieved in nine patients (75 percent). Postoperative manometric studies documented establishment of an elevated high-pressure zone compared with preoperative resting pressures. Seven patients returned a detailed functional assessment and patient satisfaction questionnaire at a mean of 40 months postsphincter activation. All seven patients reported continence to solid stool. Two patients had some problems with control of liquid stool, and three had occasional incontinence to flatus. Six of the seven patients rated their bowel control as good to excellent. All seven respondents were satisfied with their functional improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience with an artificial anal sphincter has demonstrated that continence can be restored with acceptable morbidity in patients with severe fecal incontinence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Congilosi SM, Wong WD. Anal incontinence. In: Cameron JL, ed. Current surgical therapy. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1995:240–5.
Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, Herman FN, Goldberg SM, Rothenberger DA. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:720–2.
Motson RW. Sphincter injuries: indications for and results of sphincter repair. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl):S19–21.
Corman ML. Anal incontinence following obstetrical injury. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:86–9.
Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.
Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1987;1:244–5.
Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence: report of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:432–6.
Christiansen J, Sparso B. Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter. Ann Surg 1992;215:383–6.
Orrom WJ, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL. Evaluation of an air-filled microballoon and minitransducer in the clinical practice of anorectal manometry: preliminary communication. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:594–7.
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Tim GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology 1973;1:252–9.
Scott FB. The artificial urinary sphincter: experience in adults. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:105–17.
Chandler JG, Adams RB, Friedman CJ, Marcella KL, Guerrant RL. Assessment of an implantable ileostomy sphincter. Surgery 1985;98:72–80.
Delaney J, Broadie T, Timm G, Bradley W. A prosthetic sphincter for the gastrointestinal tract. J Surg Res 1974;16:204–9.
Heiblum M, Cordoba A. An artificial sphincter: a preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:562–6.
Szinicz G. Anew implantable sphincter prosthesis for artificial anus. Int J Artif Organs 1980;3:358–62.
Light JK, Scott FB. The artificial urinary sphincter in children. Br J Urol 1984;56:54–7.
Burbige KA, Reitelman C, Olsson CA. Complications of artificial urinary sphincter around intestinal segments in reconstructed exstrophy patients. J Urol 1987;138:1123–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by American Medical Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, W.D., Jensen, L.L., Bartolo, D.C.C. et al. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 1345–1351 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054522
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054522